I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more
than just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to
have a circuit that would send neutral position information to the gyro
as if it was plugged into a receiver. Maybe I need more than that?
If you're EE inclined and have an interest in offering some thoughts,
please send me an e-mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Beav - 21 Mar 2008 16:36 GMT
>I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more than
>just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to have a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If you're EE inclined and have an interest in offering some thoughts,
> please send me an e-mail.
I'm not convinced this is allowed under either FAA or CAA rules.

Signature
Beav
VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19
Kevin - 21 Mar 2008 17:46 GMT
>> I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more than
>> just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to have a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I'm not convinced this is allowed under either FAA or CAA rules.
not sure how you would interface it either, as its ok on a model as you
don't physically move the controls in a model, you move the control
surface through the gyro.
unless you rigged up the input to the gyro to read the position of the
joystick and used the output to control the trim tab rather than the
main surface

Signature
Kevin R
Reply address works
Ralph Jones - 21 Mar 2008 18:04 GMT
>I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more
>than just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to
>have a circuit that would send neutral position information to the gyro
>as if it was plugged into a receiver. Maybe I need more than that?
Yes, you'd need something to provide two pulse trains to the gyro: one
to emulate the elevator control output of a receiver, and one to
control the gyro mode. And you'd probably want manual control inputs
to both.
Plus, what Beav said. If your glider is certificated Normal, it's an
unauthorized airframe modification: the FAA and your insurance company
will have one cow each. If it's certificated Experimental, you may be
OK.
And what's the point? The most this thing will do is keep the glider
from going out of control while you use the pee bag, and for that
purpose, between a pitch controller and a wing leveler I'd take the
latter.
rj
John Ferrell - 21 Mar 2008 22:32 GMT
>I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more
>than just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Mark
In the early 1980's there was an experimental autopilot that used an
RC servo and an inertial sensor rather than an autopilot to stabilize
the flight characteristics of a full size airplane. It was developed
by NASA at Langly as I recall. The RC servo "flew" a trim tab for
control functions and therefore was easy for the pilot to over power.
As I recall, there was a professor at Ohio State University who
utilized the unit in an EAA Thorpe.
I don't know if the EAA folks have archives of this sort of thing but
I think I attended a seminar about the device at the 1982 Oshkosh fly
in....
John Ferrell W8CCW
Beware of the dopeler effect (pronounced dope-ler).
That's where bad ideas seem good if they come at you
fast enough.
Gary Emerson - 26 Mar 2008 12:33 GMT
> I think that if I wanted to make this work, I'd need to provide more
> than just power to a gyro/servo combination. I'd probably also need to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Mark
Does anyone know where I could find the specs for the pulse that the
Futaba receiver is generating.
John Ferrell - 26 Mar 2008 16:35 GMT
>Does anyone know where I could find the specs for the pulse that the
>Futaba receiver is generating.
The portioning pulse is between 1 and 2 milliseconds. It needs to be
repeated every 30 milliseconds or so. To develop maximum drive power
from a given servo it is important to send the positioning pulse and
the rated interval.
Please Google "RC servo" and you will find all you wanted and more on
the subject. I find the Robot Groups have more useful ideas than the
RC groups.
John Ferrell W8CCW
Beware of the dopeler effect (pronounced dope-ler).
That's where bad ideas seem good if they come at you
fast enough.