Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Helicopters / November 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

EFlite mCX

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
FastFreddie - 31 Oct 2008 03:43 GMT
I have no  experience with model helicopters.  I am considering purchasing a
EFlite mCx.  I would appreciate any comments concerning this model.

Thanks

Fast Freddy
Larry Farrell - 31 Oct 2008 05:16 GMT
> I have no  experience with model helicopters.  I am considering purchasing a
> EFlite mCx.  I would appreciate any comments concerning this model.
>
> Thanks
>
> Fast Freddy

It is extremely stable; when it is properly trimmed, it will hover with
no hands on the controller at all.  My 8 year old grandson and even my
wife (who has never flown *anything*) were able to fly it reasonably the
first time out.  After a bit, they were both able to fly it around the
room and land reasonably.  It is so light that even if it does crash,
the likelihood is that nothing will break; I have had mine a couple of
months and haven't replaced anything yet, not even a rotor blade.

You really need to consider buying additional batteries.  With only one
battery, which comes with the mCX, you just start getting into it when
you have to stop and re-charge.  That is 6-8 minutes of flight time
followed by 20-30 minutes charging.  With multiple batteries, which cost
about $11 each, you can switch off and have a lot more fun.

Bottom line is that helicopters are much different than regular RC
planes.  They move in too darn many direction.  However, the mCX is so
stable that you will be able to deal with that issue and learn basic
control movements in all directions.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
FastFreddie - 31 Oct 2008 16:56 GMT
Many thanks for the reply, Larry.   Much appreciated.

Fast Freddy

>> I have no  experience with model helicopters.  I am considering purchasing a
>> EFlite mCx.  I would appreciate any comments concerning this model.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>control movements in all directions.
>** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 31 Oct 2008 22:25 GMT
>I have no  experience with model helicopters.  I am considering purchasing a
>EFlite mCx.  I would appreciate any comments concerning this model.

Love mine.  I got the Bind 'n Fly version so I can use my existing
transmitter (JR X9303) with it.

Super easy to fly and will hover in the same general spot for ages -
even if you put the transmitter down.

Definitely pick up at least one spare battery tho.
FastFreddie - 31 Oct 2008 23:36 GMT
Thanks, "Other Kevin" for the reply

Fast Freddie
Jack Schmidling - 01 Nov 2008 00:56 GMT
I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
find anything other than
coaxial types in this size.

Is there anything out there that I am missing?  I want to fly in the
house.

js
Andreas Beck - 01 Nov 2008 02:15 GMT
> I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
> chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
> find anything other than coaxial types in this size.

SRB Quark has tail, but is FP. But all people I know that have one, just
love it.

Other than that: The mCX is the most stable thing I ever flew.

CU, Andy
Jack Schmidling - 01 Nov 2008 06:16 GMT
On Oct 31, 7:15 pm, Andreas Beck <becka-news-
nospam-2008...@bedatec.de> wrote:
> > I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
> > chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
> > find anything other than coaxial types in this size.
>
> SRB Quark has tail, but is FP.

What is "FP"?  and while I am at it, ESC?

However, looking at the Quark, it's bigger than the one I have which
is a Blade Runner.

I ended it up with the BR because of name confusion.  I was told Blade
was good stuff and thought the BR was it.

What do people think of the BR?

I think it's a bit over priced for what it does which is just
flyable.  Not much finesse.

js
Andreas Beck - 01 Nov 2008 13:22 GMT
> On Oct 31, 7:15 pm, Andreas Beck <becka-news-
> nospam-2008...@bedatec.de> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> SRB Quark has tail, but is FP.
> What is "FP"?  

Fixed pitch. That is the main blades have a fixed angle of attack and
gaining or loosing height is done by changing the rotational speed of
the rotor.

This usually means they are slower to react to user input and that you
cannot do full 3D with them, as that would require negative angle of
attack which cannot be done with a FP design (unless you run the motor
backwards, which would mean having to stop it first ...).

Usually KoAx Helicopters use that design.

> and while I am at it, ESC?

Electronic Speed Controller - the piece of electronics that drives the
motor.

> However, looking at the Quark, it's bigger than the one I have which
> is a Blade Runner.

Yeah. Depends on the size of your indoor space.

CU, ANdy
Jack Schmidling - 01 Nov 2008 17:43 GMT
On Nov 1, 6:22 am, Andreas Beck <becka-news-nospam-2008...@bedatec.de>
wrote:

> Fixed pitch. That is the main blades have a fixed angle of attack and
> gaining or loosing height is done by changing the rotational speed of
> the rotor.

Roger.

> This usually means they are slower to react to user input and that you
> cannot do full 3D with them....

That was going to be my next question... 3D?

However, I now suspect that it means it can not fly sideways?

The Blade Runner must be pointed into the direction of flight.

Would this also be true of the mcx?

> Electronic Speed Controller - the piece of electronics that drives the
> motor.

I presume they all have this by definition.  Why is it listed as a
feature on some spec sheets?

js

--
PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm
Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com
Larry Farrell - 01 Nov 2008 18:51 GMT
[snip]

>> This usually means they are slower to react to user input and that you
>> cannot do full 3D with them....
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Would this also be true of the mcx?

3D basically means ability to fly in all directions in all orientations,
including inverted.  Not really possible with fixed pitch helis.

The mCX comes with a 4 channel transmitter, or functions on 4 channels
if you use your own transmitter.  That means it can fly sideways; left
stick is throttle (back and forth) and rotation (left and right) while
the right stick is backward and forward flight (back and forth) and
sideways flight (left and right).
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Jack Schmidling - 01 Nov 2008 19:59 GMT
> The mCX comes with a 4 channel transmitter, or functions on 4 channels
> if you use your own transmitter.  That means it can fly sideways; left
> stick is throttle (back and forth) and rotation (left and right) while
> the right stick is backward and forward flight (back and forth) and
> sideways flight (left and right).

How does is fly sideways if the rotors can't tilt?

And are you saying that it can't do this with the transmitter
supplied?

js

--
PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm
Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com
Kevin - 01 Nov 2008 20:11 GMT
>> The mCX comes with a 4 channel transmitter, or functions on 4 channels
>> if you use your own transmitter.  That means it can fly sideways; left
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm
> Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com
the rotor has to tilt to make the helicopter fly in any direction fixed
pitch does not mean it cannot tilt, and it can fly sidewards with any
transmitter

Signature

Kevin R
Reply address works

Larry Farrell - 01 Nov 2008 20:46 GMT
>> The mCX comes with a 4 channel transmitter, or functions on 4 channels
>> if you use your own transmitter.  That means it can fly sideways; left
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm
> Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com

Four channels are four channels, no matter what transmitter is used (as
long as the transmitter is capable of four channels, as is the
transmitter provided with the mCX Ready To Fly [see my message above]).
 The mCX can fly sideways, as I indicated above.

Signature

Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Microbiology
Idaho State University
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Larry Farrell - 01 Nov 2008 03:35 GMT
> I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
> chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> js

I don't think there is a collective pitch heli in this small size.  I
have never seen any in all the Net reading I have done.

There *are* non-coaxials in this size; Air Hogs has one that seems to be
pretty much the standard for micro-helis, although there are scads of
copies of various levels of capability (mostly worse, as far as I can
tell).
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
blevesque - 01 Nov 2008 04:34 GMT
> I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
> chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> js

I'm a new at heli's too.
I have a helimax axe cpl that I fly in the house. I just hover in the
living room.
If I had it to do over again I would of bought the falcon 3d, Because it
comes with BL motor and it has bely drive tail rotor.
o well
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 04 Nov 2008 18:13 GMT
>I am leaning toward buying this also but I would really like a real
>chopper with functional tail rotor and collective pitch but I can not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>js

The new Walkera 4#3 will be collective pitch and micro.  The fixed
pitch version is out right now.  Not sure when the collective pitch
version will be hitting the shelves.
Jack Schmidling - 07 Nov 2008 00:42 GMT
Just got my mcx and have a few questions.

First of all, what is the rectangular button under the led on the
transmitter?

The manual stinks but what's new about that?

The idea of using batteries to charge batteries can only appeal to the
people who sell batteries.

It seems obvious that I could wire a 6V wall wart to the battery
terminals but with all the horror words about recharging lipos, I
thought I would check first.

Assuming I still have battery life but need a break, can I just set it
down for an hour and come back and run it?  Unplugging the battery all
the time is a real pain.
Can I turn off the transmitter and just turn it on again?

The battery charger seems to have rather sophisticated electronics so
why can't I just leave the battery in until I need it or at least for
a few hours?

On two occasions, the rotors would not turn and re-binding seemed to
solve the problem.  Is this typical?

js

--
PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm
Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com
Andreas Beck - 07 Nov 2008 12:04 GMT
> First of all, what is the rectangular button under the led on the
> transmitter?

Hmm - I fly it with my DX6i, so I can just guess, but it might be the
binding button. Hold and turn on to bind the transmitter to a new
receiver which is in bind mode.

> The idea of using batteries to charge batteries can only appeal to the
> people who sell batteries.
> It seems obvious that I could wire a 6V wall wart to the battery
> terminals but with all the horror words about recharging lipos, I
> thought I would check first.

Some people have done so and seem to be alive. However it is not as
trivial as it may seem, as the charging LED gets its power from the
second cell, so in addition to adding wiring a 6V source to the end
terminals you have to add in some diodes in series to bridge the
first cell.

I personally will first analyze the electronics within it before attempting
to do so, though.
Some "chargers" use the internal resistance of the power source as
charging current limiter, which is why the manuals even advise not to
use NiCd or NiMH cells (as they have a very low internal resistance).

> Assuming I still have battery life but need a break, can I just set it
> down for an hour and come back and run it?  Unplugging the battery all
> the time is a real pain.

I suppose it would eat quite a bit of battery. The LED alone will eat
significant amounts of the mere 100mAh of the small LiPo.

> Can I turn off the transmitter and just turn it on again?

Should work. However one should not get into that habit with
helicopters.

2.4GHz systems should safely go into failsafe.
If you do that with 35MHz systems, you might find your model doing
interesting aerobatics, as someone a mile away scanned the band and
found "his" frequency free ...
Or just because the receiver picked up some static ...

> The battery charger seems to have rather sophisticated electronics so
> why can't I just leave the battery in until I need it or at least for
> a few hours?

I think you can. At least I did. I suppose it will drain batteries a
bit, though.

> On two occasions, the rotors would not turn and re-binding seemed to
> solve the problem.  Is this typical?

Maybe you did not leave the transmitter enough time to settle onto the
two frequencies it picks on startup, so the heli goes into bind mode
after 15s of not finding "his" transmitter.

Same can happen if transmitter does not find proper frequencies or
cannot radiate properly. People tell me you should hold up the
transmitter for about 5-10 seconds after turning it on to give it
a proper chance to scan the band.

CU, Andy
Jack Schmidling - 07 Nov 2008 14:25 GMT
On Nov 7, 6:04 am, Andreas Beck <becka-news-nospam-2008...@bedatec.de>
wrote:

> Some people have done so and seem to be alive. However it is not as
> trivial as it may seem, as the charging LED gets its power from the
> second cell, so in addition to adding wiring a 6V source to the end
> terminals you have to add in some diodes in series to bridge the
> first cell.

Glad I asked.  The guy at Hobbyzone said no problem.

I noticed the business about the second battery when putzing with it.
I also notice the charging light goes on with no batteries as soon as
I plug in the flight battery.  This is most puzzling.

> Some "chargers" use the internal resistance of the power source as
> charging current limiter, which is why the manuals even advise not to
> use NiCd or NiMH cells (as they have a very low internal resistance).

The manual only says not use a NiCd or NiMH charger and says nothing
about using them in the charger.  This could be intentional or just
Chinese English.

One other thing I discovered last night is that after flying for what
seems about the expected battery time, the led starts blinking in the
heli.  This could be a low voltage warning but the manual says nothing
about it.

Thanks for your help.

js
KGB - 07 Nov 2008 17:26 GMT
<SNIP>
>One other thing I discovered last night is that after flying for what
>seems about the expected battery time, the led starts blinking in the
>heli.  This could be a low voltage warning but the manual says nothing
>about it.

Hi

Mine also does that -  and at the same time, power to the motors is
reduced as described in the manual, so the blinking is almost
certainly a low voltage warning; possibly a modification added after
the manual was printed??

Regards
KGB
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 18 Nov 2008 18:51 GMT
>Just got my mcx and have a few questions.
>
>First of all, what is the rectangular button under the led on the
>transmitter?

I have the Bind 'n Fly version so I didn't get the Tx with mine, but
my guess is it's the bind button.

>The manual stinks but what's new about that?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>terminals but with all the horror words about recharging lipos, I
>thought I would check first.

There's a thread on helifreak.com with photos and detail on how to
wire up a wall wart to the charger.

>Assuming I still have battery life but need a break, can I just set it
>down for an hour and come back and run it?  Unplugging the battery all
>the time is a real pain.
>Can I turn off the transmitter and just turn it on again?

Not a good idea to leave the heli energized and shut off the Tx
regardless of whether it's a mCX or a Trex 600.  ALWAYS power down the
heli, then shut off the Tx.  

>The battery charger seems to have rather sophisticated electronics so
>why can't I just leave the battery in until I need it or at least for
>a few hours?

Dunno.  It only takes 20 mins to charge the batt..  I usually just
haul the charger around with me until the light goes out.

>On two occasions, the rotors would not turn and re-binding seemed to
>solve the problem.  Is this typical?

Shoulnd't be.  The manual does say to make sure the Tx is on for
several seconds prior to powering up the heli and to not disturb the
heli after the bett is plugged in.  I turn on my Tx, count to 10 then
connect the batt to the heli.  After everything's initialized, I slip
the battery in place and fly.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.