>> Now that the new eleventh list of 78 compounds and things known to
>> cause cancer has recently come out and nitromethane just made the list I
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> to
> slap a warning on the product.
I couldn't believe it when I read a warning on a R/C fuel tank stating that
it might come into contact with substances known to the state of california
to cause cancer. It's one thing to say a substance such a glow fuel may
cause cancer but to start labelling related but otherwise safe products as
potentially dangerous?
Perhaps we will start seeing warnings that seat belts may come into contact
with substances (eg. cars) which may be related to products that might harm
us (eg. fuel or other objects the car might run into).............
Next thing will be to place warning labels on smoke detectors that the smoke
it detects may be harmful.........
Don't even consider spacesuits.....
Life is known to the state of California as containing elements which
conclusively lead to the state of death after a period of exposure.....

Signature
The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** Now I will bring chaos to the world!
while i totally understand what you're saying, it seems to be a
defeatist view point. because you feel like you have no control over
these things, you attribute it to "one of those things".
what i find hard to accept is that i might be PAYING for products that
contain carcinogens.
remember the Micronite filters in the Kent brand cigarettes in the 50s?
probably THE BEST filter to date. what Kent failed to mention was
that the filter material was asbestos. now, had they mentioned this in
the warning label: This has asbestos, smoke at your own risk. that
might have been a bit more responsible.
and i think that is what it comes down to. sure, obviously, smoking is
really bad. it goes without saying. but people choose to do it
anyway. be they misinformed or not.
but simply implying that it's people's responsibility to take the
responsibility for everything. that's silly. how is someone supposed
to know to information on a product that is harmful, when they don't
have a clue that is in the first place?
seems to me, some strange logic going on here.
and what about the companies using questionable chemicals for consumer
products. they have no, zero, liability?
while this isn't intended to start the debate of ages, i simply posted
these for thought. the truth is, people are more uniformed today about
the products they buy because they "don't have time", "don't care", or,
like you, have simply accepted, on a conscience or subsonscience level,
that they have no control over the quality of the products they buy.
but yet, they choose not to try to change the quality of the offerings.
> > Now that the new eleventh list of 78 compounds and things known to
> > cause cancer has recently come out and nitromethane just made the list I
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Chris
Frater Mus - 02 Feb 2005 21:52 GMT
> remember the Micronite filters in the Kent brand cigarettes in the 50s?
> probably THE BEST filter to date. what Kent failed to mention was
> that the filter material was asbestos. now, had they mentioned this in
> the warning label: This has asbestos, smoke at your own risk. that
> might have been a bit more responsible.
The use of "micronite" was discontinued by Kent roughly at the same
time as the causal relationship between asbestos and lung disease
was scientifically demonstrated (1955).

Signature
http://cbsrmt.mousetrap.net/RMTdb/ CBS Radio Mystery Theater database
CBSRMT uploads each day in <news:alt.binaries.sounds.radio.cbsrmt>
http://greyhound.mousetrap.net/altus/ our ex-racer greyhound
http://www.mousetrap.net/~mouse/cs.html How to get good phone support
thecontact_509@hotmail.com - 03 Feb 2005 02:49 GMT
it's no casual relationship these days.
but see? perfect example....i didn't know that they didn't know that
it was dangerous stuff.
the unaware are unaware that they are unaware.
Justin Mahn - 03 Feb 2005 12:41 GMT
> it's no casual relationship these days.
>
> but see? perfect example....i didn't know that they didn't know that
> it was dangerous stuff.
> the unaware are unaware that they are unaware.
causal is not the same as casual.
Causal - being caused by
Casual - informal, everyday.
Frater Mus - 04 Feb 2005 16:11 GMT
> it's no casual relationship these days.
Causal, not casual.

Signature
http://cbsrmt.mousetrap.net/RMTdb/ CBS Radio Mystery Theater database
CBSRMT uploads each day in <news:alt.binaries.sounds.radio.cbsrmt>
http://greyhound.mousetrap.net/altus/ our ex-racer greyhound
http://www.mousetrap.net/~mouse/cs.html How to get good phone support
thecontact_509@hotmail.com - 03 Feb 2005 02:52 GMT
it's no casual relationship these days.
but see? perfect example....i didn't know that they didn't know that
it was dangerous stuff.
the unaware are unaware that they are unaware.
Peter James - 03 Feb 2005 13:17 GMT
> it's no casual relationship these days.
>
> but see? perfect example....i didn't know that they didn't know that
> it was dangerous stuff.
> the unaware are unaware that they are unaware.
You've been listening to big Donald too much ;)
the_atomic_punk - 04 Feb 2005 02:44 GMT
I always make it a habit to wash my hands thouroghly after working or
cleaning my nitro rides.I notice on other products similar warnings,all
founded in california?
They must just be health nut's living there.I guess they figure if
you're not eating granola bars and drinking smoothies you are going to
die!