Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Land Models / March 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

R/C Hand drill ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Newbie - 08 Mar 2005 09:26 GMT
Hello,

I am wondering if any of you have ever seen a R/C hand drill. The idea
is to use small servos that would push the trigger of a hand drill as
well as make it go back and forth. Has anybody ever seen something like
this on the web. Either it has never been done and reported on the web
or I am using the wrong keywords on google.

Thanks in advance,

Jake.
kenji - 08 Mar 2005 13:26 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jake.

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/069901.html
abracadabra - 08 Mar 2005 18:13 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> this on the web. Either it has never been done and reported on the web
> or I am using the wrong keywords on google.

IF you are limiting yourself to only hand drills, the answer is NO.
By definition they were not meant to be automated.

IF you are talking about
   a) on/off power for a drill
   b) push/retract for drill pressure,
these two actions are what CNC (Computer-Numerical-Controlled)
drills are all about, although these are usually floor-standing
machine-tools.

Also, assuming that you have a clamping setup to hold the drill,
servo-controlled actuators could be attached to that mount
that would interact mechanically with the drill to imitate your
finger action.  Furthermore, the mount itself would need to be
on a slider of some kind to make it move forward.

A company called something like Stock Drive Parts ...

   http://www.sdp-si.com/

has a catalog (free) of all sorts of small precision parts that would
work in conjuction with the servos or actuators you would need.
   N.B.  I strongly recommend you get their catalog before
   doing anything or even going thru their web site.

You are likely to find everything that you want from a supplier
like FESTO who specialize in automation equipment (usually
pneumatic) for doing what you want.  Naturally this is industrial
grade versus hobby grade, but if you are trying to build something
to throw into the "Robot Wars" ring, then FESTO or someone like
them is where you'll find some of what you need.

Some relevant reading on (servo-actuated drilling):
   http://www.mendonet.com/cnclinks/
   http://www.electroimpact.com/research/DRILLDRIVE.asp

http://www.techsavvy.com/industry/file/national/0bp4v/hmi02.html?id=131177&comp_
id=0BP4V&base_region
=*
   http://www.manufacturingcenter.com/tooling/archives/0800/0800tp.asp

Othe info

http://pub157.ezboard.com/frobotbattlesfrm4.showMessageRange?topicID=9.topic&sta
rt=21&stop=40

   http://www.uspto.gov/go/classification/uspc251/defs251.htm
   http://www.communitypc.com/links.htm

Have fun,

Eric
Himszy - 08 Mar 2005 22:07 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jake.

When I made my electric screwdriver r/c i found it was alot easier to take
it apart and make my own switch.
Newbie - 08 Mar 2005 23:23 GMT
I have taken apart one of these switches, they are not easy to
understand actually. How can I actuate these switches with r/c servos
is really the question.

Jake,
Steve Banks - 09 Mar 2005 01:10 GMT
Umm.. it sounds like you really want a speed controller with reverse.  You
are mostly on your own when you get into Rube Goldberg land,
http://www.rubegoldberg.com/html/gallery.htm , as it seems like that is
where you are headed here ;)

Over and out.

> I have taken apart one of these switches, they are not easy to
> understand actually. How can I actuate these switches with r/c servos
> is really the question.
>
> Jake,
Si Ballenger - 08 Mar 2005 23:47 GMT
>Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>this on the web. Either it has never been done and reported on the web
>or I am using the wrong keywords on google.

The below link shows one way to have a servo operate a switch,
which could be easier than pushing a button with the servo. You
can tie the button down and turn it on and off by placing two
wires on opposite sides of a thin piece of cardboard, and placing
this between the battery tip and the battery holder contact.

http://www.geocities.com/zoomkat/switch.htm
Newbie - 11 Mar 2005 15:49 GMT
Thank you this is along the lines of what I was looking for.

Jake.
AirMan - 12 Mar 2005 02:18 GMT
Ok we give up already!
What the heck is it's use?
> Thank you this is along the lines of what I was looking for.
>
> Jake.
Steve Banks - 12 Mar 2005 02:38 GMT
Have fun with the rotary switch newbie. You should be made aware that for
about the same amount of money and effort and 1/100 the weight you could put
together a solid state switch, here are some examples (there are lots more):
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/gadgets/rc-sw.htm
http://www.welwyn.demon.co.uk/rcsw/rcsw.htm

and here is a real cheap one:
http://www.tuug.fi/~isaarine/electronics/rc-switch/
This uses a 4001 quad NOR (<$0.40) for an oscillator and a latch.  Hook up a
mosfet for a few bucks and it will handle a load, and be solid state
reliable.

> Ok we give up already!
> What the heck is it's use?
> > Thank you this is along the lines of what I was looking for.
> >
> > Jake.
Newbie - 12 Mar 2005 17:26 GMT
I am sensitive to the Rube Goldberg parallel, this is why I really like
your answer. Thanks,

Jake.

> Have fun with the rotary switch newbie. You should be made aware that for
> about the same amount of money and effort and 1/100 the weight you could put
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > >
> > > Jake.
Himszy - 12 Mar 2005 10:44 GMT
He has told you whats it for:

Agreed for the RC flying. This is not a brainstorming technique,
rather, I am trying to see why this ability to automate a relatively
powerful but cheap piece of equipment has not been more used by
hobbyists.

I am actually thinking of several different project, at least two of
them use powerful rotating motors and do not need to run for hours.

The first one is indeed a battle bot of some kind. The second is a
robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at the
feet of the robot.) Both of these, I think require, a cheap way to do
drilling. Since I am on the cheap, I see this hand drill solution as
pretty ideal.

Jake.
abracadabra - 12 Mar 2005 23:06 GMT
> The second is a
> robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at the
> feet of the robot.) Both of these, I think require, a cheap way to do
> drilling.

I am curious how you will achieve the rock-face drilling.

   - drilling in rock (like concrete) takes a lot of pressure

   - rock drilling is best achieved (not only way) when using
           water/air as lubricant for cooling and chip removal
           from the hole to prevent clogging and overheat

I am sure that you don't want to reveal what may become
a trade secret (keeping a grip on the wall while drilling)
but assuming that you are dealing with

   - 6 legs ( 2 move forward at a time into new holes)
   - 2 drills for punching a set of holes at the same time
           (to prevent advancing at a complete crawl)

I recommend expanding pins on the legs themselves rather
than drills.  This way, they insert loose, then can be
clamped(expanded) or released for holding  or moving on.

This would allow you to invest in better equipment and drills
for the 2 drills, but it would add extra weight.

If you use only drills for the hole drilling,  and you leave them
in the hole during a manoeuvre (move other legs), you face
the danger of cooling of the rock-wall clamping on your
leg drill-bit.

VERY NOVEL idea to pursue !   I love it because I can
imagine many applications that I don't want to mention here.

Good Luck !

Eric
John Alt - 12 Mar 2005 23:47 GMT
> > The second is a
> > robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at the
> > feet of the robot.) Both of these, I think require, a cheap way to do
> > drilling.
>
> I am curious how you will achieve the rock-face drilling.

I'm curious if he thought about the implications of trying it out in a
national park ;)
abracadabra - 13 Mar 2005 02:14 GMT
I think I figured it out !

It's an underwater mining exploration rig !

He wants to drill into the chasm walls,
   - where veins of readily-available minerals are exposed, and
   - where currents are erratic.

   => can't use a tether for wireline control from a sub that is
           bouncing around in the eddy currents.

Alright, I admit that it's a stretch ... but WE will never know
until it shows up in Popular Science     :-))

Eric
Poxy - 13 Mar 2005 14:43 GMT
>> The second is a
>> robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> a trade secret (keeping a grip on the wall while drilling)
> but assuming that you are dealing with

See, that's what I like about Newsgroups. Just when things are getting
boring, you get a great post like this one. Someone has an ever so sligtly
misguided idea about using power drills as motive force for some robot
thing, and another guy comes out of no where, grabs the ball and is suddenly
seen sprinting off in a completely unrelated direction for the "rock face
drilling" goal line. Brilliant!
Ed Cregger - 13 Mar 2005 14:56 GMT
>>> The second is a
>>> robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> seen sprinting off in a completely unrelated direction for the "rock face
> drilling" goal line. Brilliant!

Yeah, it's kind of like the old practice that we all used to share many,
many years ago. You know the one. It happened when we all stood around on a
street corner and talked to one another. I think it was called conversation.
8^>

Ed Cregger
Si Ballenger - 13 Mar 2005 15:39 GMT
>>>> The second is a
>>>> robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>street corner and talked to one another. I think it was called conversation.
>8^>

Closer to gossip where you just make stuff up and pass it on. The
gizmo is definately a motorized sex toy needed for the customers
of a web dominatrix. Remember, you heard it here first!
abracadabra - 13 Mar 2005 20:25 GMT
> See, that's what I like about Newsgroups. Just when things are getting
> boring, you get a great post like this one. Someone has an ever so sligtly
> misguided idea about using power drills as motive force for some robot
> thing, and another guy comes out of no where, grabs the ball and is suddenly
> seen sprinting off in a completely unrelated direction for the "rock face
> drilling" goal line. Brilliant!

That was the manufacturing troubleshooter in me crawling out of the
cocoon hoping that the emerging creature was beautiful.

Did you feel the urge to jump into the sub and go undersea mining ?

Eric
AirMan - 09 Mar 2005 05:18 GMT
For what use?
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jake.
mkirsch1@rochester.rr.com - 09 Mar 2005 19:59 GMT
He's a terrorist and he wants to build a remote-controlled drill to
threaten airline passengers while he hijacks the plane and crashes it
into the World Trade Center...

For crying out loud, WHO CARES? He wants to run a drill with servos.
Let him be creative. Maybe he'll invent something useful and
revolutionary.
The Raven - 09 Mar 2005 09:58 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> this on the web. Either it has never been done and reported on the web
> or I am using the wrong keywords on google.

Haven't seen one but I'm sure one could be easily made using standard
components.

Not sure what the point  is but it sounds like you are trying to build a
mini-mill or automated pedestal drill for some industrial application.

Signature

The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** Now I will bring chaos to the world!

cm - 10 Mar 2005 00:22 GMT
You don't have to use servos. There are switches available which are
activated by the receiver, i.e. plug into ch5 and switch on and off with the
ch5 switch on the TX. The ones that I know of wouldn't handle the current
but it might be easier to use a relay than rig up a servo.
CM
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jake.
AirMan - 10 Mar 2005 05:07 GMT
But we still wonder about the purpose of an RC drill!
> You don't have to use servos. There are switches available which are
> activated by the receiver, i.e. plug into ch5 and switch on and off with
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Jake.
Dr1 - 10 Mar 2005 02:14 GMT
What frequency band would it be on?

Dr1
Matthew Gunn - 10 Mar 2005 02:32 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Jake.

C'mon Jake.  Everyones curious.  Just what are you planning on doing
with this R/C drill?
If it is for a CNC drill application or mill type arrangement, I would
recommend modifying a drill press.  They're a bit more expensive than a
hand drill but they already have the mechanical mounting and sliding
built in.  Then all you have to do (he says as if it is easy) is make a
moving base for a vice.
If you let us know what you are planning I'm sure you will get more
ideas better suited to a solution.

Matthew
Justin Mahn - 10 Mar 2005 06:05 GMT
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Matthew

Maybe it's for a battle bot?
Matthew Gunn - 10 Mar 2005 06:32 GMT
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am wondering if any of you have ever seen a R/C hand drill. The idea
>>> is to use small servos that would push the trigger of a hand drill as
>>> well as make it go back and forth.

> Maybe it's for a battle bot?

Could be.  In which case a cordless drill is perfect.  Then I would have
to ask, do you really need the variable speed?  So many questions all
answered by knowing the purpose of the drill.

Matthew
abracadabra - 10 Mar 2005 19:16 GMT
Maybe he's building a new kind of remotely-controlled
bomb-defusing robot.  It would explain why he is being cagey.

If so, do look up the references I posted earlier.

Eric
abracadabra - 10 Mar 2005 20:30 GMT
One other comment.

By refraining from "leading" our thought processes,
he is deliberately using the brainstorming technique
to generate ideas, possibly coming up with that
most perfect of solutions from out in left field:

   the elegant solution !

To that I would respond:

   Let the creative juices flow !

HOWEVER, I think it is time to reduce the scope
back down to only

   comp.robotics.misc
   rec.models.rc.misc
   rec.models.rc.land

because this is straying far from specific RC flying.

Eric
Newbie - 11 Mar 2005 15:46 GMT
> One other comment.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Eric

Agreed for the RC flying. This is not a brainstorming technique,
rather, I am trying to see why this ability to automate a relatively
powerful but cheap piece of equipment has not been more used by
hobbyists.

I am actually thinking of several different project, at least two of
them use powerful rotating motors and do not need to run for hours.

The first one is indeed a battle bot of some kind. The second is a
robot that would climb on walls or cliffs (the hand drill serves at the
feet of the robot.) Both of these, I think require, a cheap way to do
drilling. Since I am on the cheap, I see this hand drill solution as
pretty ideal.

Jake.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.