Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Land Models / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Very Lean Engine?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gary - 06 Sep 2006 22:45 GMT
Hello,

As I understand it - the closer you get to closing the HSN, the leaner the
engine is?  is it safe for me to run my TT MTA4 as close it will go before
the engine cuts out?

What are the effects of doing this?  As say compared to 2.5 turns out?

Gary.
Chris - 06 Sep 2006 23:16 GMT
> As I understand it - the closer you get to closing the HSN, the leaner the
> engine is?  is it safe for me to run my TT MTA4 as close it will go before
> the engine cuts out?

You are correct in that closing the high-speed needle leans the
mixture(less fuel per same amount of air).

Now, while the manuals will tell you to do the "lean to peak and then
barely back it off" routine, 10 years of experience have taught me that
a slightly richer mixture than what the manufacturers recommend will
give you a dramatically longer engine life. Running it at or too close
to stoich will cause the engine to run hotter and you'll burn out your
piston/sleeve assembly much more quickly. I think most manufacturers
call for 1/16th of a turn out from the leanest point. I'd go closer to
1/8th of a turn or very slightly more for safety and longevity reasons.

Bear in mind, I'm in Arizona and things tend to get very hot here in
the summer. If you are in a cooler climate you might get away with
running leaner. You'll have to put some hours on the engine to see what
works best for you. Just as an FYI, the first sign of excessive wear in
the piston/sleeve assy is the loss of idle. If you can't get your
engine to idle but it runs okay if you keep the throttle open, all
other things checked and verified, you are probably looking at a worn
out piston/sleeve.

Chris
Gary - 06 Sep 2006 23:23 GMT
> Bear in mind, I'm in Arizona and things tend to get very hot here in
> the summer. If you are in a cooler climate you might get away with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> other things checked and verified, you are probably looking at a worn
> out piston/sleeve.

Thanks for the tips....

Gary.
PS - Scotland, cooler climate?  You better believe it - I was FROZEN today,
and the sun was shining.
Doc - 07 Sep 2006 02:12 GMT
>> As I understand it - the closer you get to closing the HSN, the leaner
>> the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Chris

Sound advice!  I always run mine as rich as I can while still getting decent
performance out of them.  Sure, I could lean and have more power, but I'd
rather have an engine live for 16 gallons (The S-25 will not die!!!!) then
2.

Doc
DanTXD - 07 Sep 2006 02:19 GMT
>>> As I understand it - the closer you get to closing the HSN, the leaner
>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Doc

Yea that's usually how I run too.  But be careful, too rich can apparently
be worse than too lean... (i don't know if I beleive that though...).

Of course, I'd never see 16 gallons on an engine because I get bored and
want to change them :-)

Signature

Dan - on his PC

Doc - 07 Sep 2006 02:40 GMT
> Yea that's usually how I run too.  But be careful, too rich can apparently
> be worse than too lean... (i don't know if I beleive that though...).

I don't see how.  With 4-stroke gassers such is true d/t cylinder washdown,
but with 2-stroke nitros more fuel = more lube = longer life.

> Of course, I'd never see 16 gallons on an engine because I get bored and
> want to change them :-)

Ya know, I've been trying to hurt the S-25 for 2 gallons or so.  I have it
leaned to the max, am running consistent temps between 290*-310* and it
refuses to die.  Hell, it refuses to slow down even.  Not the most powerful
mill out there, but it's lasting power is to be commended!

Other than when I fist got started and blew a few mills d/t not knowing what
the hell I was doing with a screwdriver and HSN, I've only killed one, and
that was a few weeks back at the track when I cooked the .26 in my buggy d/t
an air filter leak and super fine dust on the track.

Hmmmmmm, Tower has a $25 off $199 or more right now.................that
brings the .30 VG down to $224.99..............he he he he!

Doc
DanTXD - 07 Sep 2006 02:46 GMT
>> Yea that's usually how I run too.  But be careful, too rich can
>> apparently be worse than too lean... (i don't know if I beleive that
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Hmmmmmm, Tower has a $25 off $199 or more right now.................that
> brings the .30 VG down to $224.99..............he he he he!

I remember the first engine I saw properly let go - my mates Force .21 - the
first engine any of us had ever used - we didn't touch the HSN at all, it
just, worked :-)  One day it seized, so we took it apart, there was a few
shards of metal in it (we later found out these came from where the conrod
attachs to the piston...).  Then it ran perfectly again after we took those
out, then a couple of runs later it was flat out across a car park, then
started to sound a bit rough, then my mate said "She's not happy" then
pooof.  It seized.  Conrod had parted company with the top of the piston in
a very destructive way...

Force engines.  Don't you just want one :-)

Signature

Dan - on his PC

Doc - 07 Sep 2006 03:07 GMT
>>> Yea that's usually how I run too.  But be careful, too rich can
>>> apparently be worse than too lean... (i don't know if I beleive that
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Force engines.  Don't you just want one :-)

Those old Force .21's have a reputation for being some of the WORST engines
ever made! (especially the F21P4)

Doc
Chris - 07 Sep 2006 03:14 GMT
> > Sound advice!  I always run mine as rich as I can while still getting
> > decent performance out of them.  Sure, I could lean and have more power,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yea that's usually how I run too.  But be careful, too rich can apparently
> be worse than too lean... (i don't know if I beleive that though...).

I can see how too much fuel could potentially be bad in the sense that
the fuel has two functions - it carries the lubricating oil for the
bottom end, bearings, and piston, and it also has the fuel for the
combustion chamber. I've always been under the impression that under
optimal conditions the heat of the engine is enough to vaporize the
fuel component and leave the oil mostly behind, thus providing
lubrication while the fuel is drafted up into the combustion chamber.
Excess fuel due to a slightly over-rich mixture could dilute the oil
and prevent proper vaporization, thus preventing an adequate oil film
from protecting the critical crankshaft pin/conrod connecting point.

During the break-in process the engine temperatures and loads are so
low that the excess fuel does no harm, it simply cushions the
piston/sleeve as they form a perfect fit to each other.

I had an OS max .12CZ-Z engine years ago in my RC10GT..I broke it in
and ran it every weekend and a couple times during the week for about 5
-years- before it finally refused to idle. I never touched the
carburetor or anything else aside from an occassional air filter
cleaning..it was the most maintenance-free powerplant I've ever owned.
Proper break-in and a slighly rich mixture..and I got a -lot- of
service out of that engine.

As always, your mileage may vary... ;)

Chris
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.