> a mini cooper runs on a silver 540 can. That is roughly 36 turn. older
> motors may have a great deal of tarnish on the brushes and copper com. more
> resistance and sparking to get the motor running.
The Bigwig's stock motor was a Technigold. Tame by modern standards but it
REALLY sucks back the battery life.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Fin - 08 Aug 2007 12:16 GMT
On Aug 7, 3:16 pm, "SBlackfoot" <trypti...@sympatico.obvious.ca>
wrote:
> > a mini cooper runs on a silver 540 can. That is roughly 36 turn. older
> > motors may have a great deal of tarnish on the brushes and copper com.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
Hi Ian/SBlackfoot
MMMMmmmmm sounds like an excuse to get a new motor. Are there any
good sites for comparisons between power consumption and performance?
I'm not looking for anything crazy fast. I used to run a 50k+ rpm
high torque motor in the bigwig during the nineties and it ate
batteries in under 2 minutes. Went like a rocket from hell for those
two minutes but I'm a calmer person now and I'd like to run for more
than 15 mins at moderate speeds. I've got my nitro car if I want the
hassle of smashed parts with every crash. I also note it may be
harder to source replacements now than back in the old days. No re-
released bigwig like they've done with some of the other cars like the
grasshopper.
Do the brushless motors improve battery performance? From what I read
on the forums it just seems to be a saver on maintenance.
I've ordered up some 2200 and 3600 mah batteries and a new delta peak
battery charger so I'm hoping to have a better experience than with my
1200mah 22 year old batteries. I'm amazed they even held a charge.
Although that said I did manage to explode one over the weekend after
overcharging it by 15 minutes. Went off like a gunshot. I can see
why they don't do fast chargers without timers anymore.
Cheers for the info guys,
Fin