Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / August 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thinking of Starting a Judging Club

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stretch_5 - 22 Aug 2005 23:27 GMT
Hi All,

I attend roughly 6 local model contest/shows annually. I really enjoy
going to shows and looking at all of the hard work that modelers put in
to their projects. Its so inspiring. I also enjoy helping out with
judging. Judging is a whole different facet of modeling and for those
of you who go to model contests I highly recommend giving judging a
try. Just be aware that a lot of times it is not easy.

I think that some modelers don't like model contests for one of the
two following reasons,

1 They entered a model into a contest and did not win an award that
they thought they should have won

OR

2 they feel that the judging totally lacks integrity.

I for one...have witnessed some "great' honest judges in action.
Most judges are totally honest and do an excellent job. Unfortunately I
have witnessed a few rotten apples who are interested in seeing certain
people/models win.

So......with this information I thought it would be interesting in
trying to start a Model Judging Club. The purpose of (My) the club
would be to judge model contests.  The club would be hired (Maybe free
admission and a free lunch) by a club to attend there model show and
judge the models. The Judges would have access to all of the rules of
the shows judging criteria and would be held to a "very strict"
standard of INTEGRITY. This standard would be set by the Model Judging
club.

For some reason I feel that I am not the only one who attends model
contests and judges that feels this way.

Is this idea of mine innovative, crazy or a little bit of both...

Should I peruse it ??

Thanks

Stretch
Francis X. Kranick, Jr. - 23 Aug 2005 16:18 GMT
    Laudable thought, if misplaced.  By that, I mean what are the
criteria for your judging methods?  If a club invites you, you'll have
to judge per their directive, yes?  If they want judging per a set
standard, you'll have to adapt to it.  If they want historical accuracy
considered, can your judges do that?  If they want strictly construction
methods and finishing judged, can you do that?  1,2,3, OOB or
Gold/Silver/Bronze?  How many judges will you need on hand?
    There is much to be considered - though consider them you should.  The
organization should be completely intertwined with the judging method as
the organization alone determines what the models will be judged
by/against.  If you develop a cadre of judges who know fit-and-finish,
can they be counted on to judge historical accuracy - credibly?  Lots to
flesh-out here...
    As my boss likes to say:  "Well, good luck with that."  ;-)

Frank Kranick
Stephen Tontoni - 23 Aug 2005 16:21 GMT
I think it would be more interesting to have a yahoo group or some sort
of thing where judges can exchange ideas from any where. But I don't see
the practicality of expecting this group of judges to fly where they are
needed to judge shows, even if they were highly respected individuals.

Have you thought, rather than a physical location at which the judges
cooperate, of an electronic venue for judges to talk? Maybe a special
section in here, but I think more likely in its own newsgroup of some
sort.

Interesting.

---- Stephen Tontoni

>     Laudable thought, if misplaced.  By that, I mean what are the
> criteria for your judging methods?  If a club invites you, you'll have
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Frank Kranick
Stretch_5 - 24 Aug 2005 03:32 GMT
Hi Frank........

My Judging Club would review all model contest guidelines very
carefully before attending a contest. This would be so that on the day
of the contest....we would know exactly what the rules/criteria state.

As far as historical accuracy is concerned......I guess with
technology today one of the judges could jump on the interenet (via
laptop and cell phone) and do a lttle research if needed.
Honestly.....most contests that I have been to focus on construction
and presentation......not historical accuracey.....

The number of judges is something that I can honestly say would be a
tough number to come up with.  If the Judging team/club is highly
skilled.....then the number of judges should be smaller I would think.
We should be able to roll right along from one category to another.....

Stretch
The Kranicks - 24 Aug 2005 04:26 GMT
> Hi Frank........
>
> My Judging Club would review all model contest guidelines very
> carefully before attending a contest. This would be so that on the day
> of the contest....we would know exactly what the rules/criteria state.

    Indeed, but what if the criteria differed from one club to another?  If
you employ IPMS-style judging this month, would you be able to implement
AMPS- or NNL- (forgive me if I'm in error here - I'm not a big car guy)
style judging next month?  If an organization's requirement were to
include paint and decals (beyond application now - using the correct
paint and/or markings for a particular model), would you be able to pull
it off?

>  As far as historical accuracy is concerned......I guess with
> technology today one of the judges could jump on the interenet (via
> laptop and cell phone) and do a lttle research if needed.
> Honestly.....most contests that I have been to focus on construction
> and presentation......not historical accuracey.....

    Me, too but if this judging club were to be available for "hire", you'd
need to be well-versed in differing judging styles/systems...

> The number of judges is something that I can honestly say would be a
> tough number to come up with.  If the Judging team/club is highly
> skilled.....then the number of judges should be smaller I would think.
> We should be able to roll right along from one category to another.....

    I helped judge at the IPMS Nationals in Atlanta, my first time judging
at my first National.  It took us nearly two hours to judge 23 1/48th
single engined props (one split of seven, IIRC) and then jumped over to
dioramas.  Now, your judging club would be working local shows and
helping at Regionals, I presume; not a huge amount of models
(typically).  Our local club judged at a then-open hobby shop a couple
times and it was easy and quick.  Some of the larger Regionals could be
trouble but if a group of dedicated, conscientious judges were
assembled, I suppose it could work if they worked as a team for many
shows.  Still, if ABC Car Modelers Club asked you to judge, would you
know where a spare tire on a '66 Mustang was stored - if ABC Car
Modelers had that historical accuracy stipulation in their contest
guidelines?  A sticky wicket indeed!
    As for the comments on subjective judging, sure, there's going to be
that.  But, it's a competition after all and the third strike in
tonight's ballgame could be just as subjective to the fan watching at
home.  You'll never please everyone and there'll almost always be sore
losers.  In a competition, there has to be winners and losers, those who
'place' and those who don't; otherwise, the value of the awards is
diminished and, dare I say, there'd be even more arguing over who's
model is "better"...
    Just my $.02...

Frank Kranick
Mike G. - 23 Aug 2005 17:09 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Stretch

Stretch, I belonged to a car club for a number of years, we put on a model
contest at our car show each year, when the club found out I built models I
inherited the contest...lol. Well I built it up over the years from 10/15
entries to 50/70 each year.
I was a judge and had to find others to help me (no easy task!). I found a
couple of guys that would help out each year, I arranged for free entry to
the car show for them, dance pass for the Sat. night dance, 1 meal free each
day and all cokes free.
Needless to say, they showed up every time!...lol.
I also had to come up with prizes and really nice trophys. I also did door
prizes like the big guys and the rest of the show.
Since this contest went hand in hand with a car show we created a set of
standards; (rules as it were and these were handed out at each show)
1.Believable?
2.Engine...Detailed?
3.Interior....Detailed?
4.Fit/Finish
5.Paint
6.and for Junior Div. obvious that (dad) did it? If it was highly obvious
that dad did it, junior got disqualified and dad was told why!
Each of 1-5 had a 5 point spread. 1 being lowest and 5 highest.
We did have a category called Fantasy, where No.1 didn't apply so we added
Uniqueness to replace that.
3 age groups;
Junior....12 and under, believe me, the really young ones got cut a lot of
slack for encouragement. I wanted them to learn and have fun, but at the
same time do it themselves.
Teen......18 - 13
Adult......19 and up.
I had these categories; Stock, Rod, Custom, Competition, Truck, and Fantasy,
each had an explanation of what fit each category.
Each division had First through Third Place Trophies.
We also had a "Peoples Choice" where car show entrants picked which they
liked in all three divisions.

Stretch, don't know if this helps, but this is what I did.
Your idea is a good one, good luck with it.

Mike G.
Former member of A.C. Tumbleweeds
Moi - 23 Aug 2005 19:00 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Stretch

The discussions here about judging have seriously kept me out of
competition.  From the start, a competiton that relies on judging is
subjective.  There have been many stories of favoritism, prefered styles,
etc.  A couple ideas that come to mind about this-

1. A known modler being granted preference based on previous work or
success. (Granted, if it still looks like junk this won't help.  But if it
becomes close, who gets the benefit)

2. Current fads of style.  Whether it's preshading or inking panel lines.
Just because I don't think it looks right, but don't follow the point
gaining standard of the year, should I be docked points?

Yes, these examples might be based on some sour experiences, and I have not
competed.  But if this is keepeing me out of trying, how many others are in
the same boat?  I model for the fun of it, but would love to see how I doing
compared to others and have a fare shot.

I think (and I agree this may be out of ignorance so enlighten me so I know
the truth) that a standard of judging be adopted, am accreditation system be
established and yes, maybe a "club" that can be called on for this.  This
could benefit in a number of ways-

1. If there is an obvious breach of the judging curicula, the fellow judges
can sanction the "offender."  Some form of grievence would be etablished,
but competitors who abuse this would be known.

2. It establishes an independit pool of judges who have no gain in who wins.

3. The judging corps does not have to be one national club.  But by being
genuinly fair, honest, and good, will gain the reputation which will bring
them to many competions.  Whether its a little get together, a car show, or
major meet.

OK... too much writing takes the fun away.  It shouldn't even be a problemn,
but if we are talking about it, and not for the first time, there might need
to be a new approach.

Finally, someone please, talk me out of this and convince me to start
putting my work up for critique so I can speak from experience.

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.
Stephen Tontoni - 23 Aug 2005 23:52 GMT
This is specifically for Rich, but if there are others who are reticent
to try competition, you might have a listen too.

Every show should have some sort of criteria for judging. Most will
follow IPMS guidelines (that you can see at the IPMS USA web site)
although there are different methods for each club and contest.

I recommend a) try competition if you're interested in doing that and b)
having got your feet wet with competing, try judging. You may be an
apprentice judge in your first year (how we handle things in Seattle)
and you can learn the ins and outs of how to analyze a model.

BUT be forewarned... although judging is the best way to learn quickly
how to look at models and thereby improving your work, you will never
look at modeling the same way again. Most people who judge learn so much
that it's impossible to leave a flaw in a model that you build any
longer.

I've gotten to the point that I decide if a model will be built to
contest quality or goof-off quality. Nothing wrong with doing it either
way! But if I'm doing it to contest quality, I know how to eradicate the
flaws, and I know what the judges will be looking at.

Anyway... try it... if you don't like it, that's good too! It's all
about fun, and if it's not... well, we need a hobby then.

---Stephen Tontoni
Seattle, Washington, USA

--snippage--

> The discussions here about judging have seriously kept me out of
> competition.  From the start, a competiton that relies on judging is
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
> miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.
Greg Heilers - 24 Aug 2005 00:19 GMT
[[[ about forming a judging club/class ]]]

This sounds good "in theory", but has little merit in the real world.
Like others have said, judging is totally subjective.  It is based on
personal preferences, no matter how many "judges" claim they are being
objective.  This is no big deal....as it is just a quality of being a
real live human being.  Three judges could score a set of entries on
one day....and look at them the very next day, and score them totally
differently.  Day one's results are no more, or no less, valid than day
two's.  Remember, model building in an *art* as much as it is
"engineering", and appreciation of *art* is 100% subjective.

Signature

Greg Heilers
Registered Linux user #328317 - SlackWare 10.1 (2.6.10)
   .....

As far as anyone knows we're a nice, normal family.

 -- Homer Simpson
    There's No Disgrace Like Home

Ray S. & Nayda Katzaman - 25 Aug 2005 02:14 GMT
Stretch,
As much as I hate to do this, I'm going to have to burst your bubble.  A
judging club would not go very far, especially with the requirements you
are placing on the contest holders.  You have to remember one thing - you
see a kit at a vendor's table and you know that the kit is well worth the
$10.00 that the sticker says (he originally paid $25.00 for it), yet you
offer the guy $5.00.  By nature, modelers are a cheap bunch when it comes
to contests, and organizers are the same - after all, they are modelers.
Do you really think that they will let you and a bunch of judges they don't
know walk in for free and eat for free.  You know how much money they would
not be making by doing that?

If your club does all of the judging, you are going to need about 20 to 25
judges, maybe more.  At about $5 per judge at the door that's $75, then the
food is another $75, that is $150.  A club sponsoring a contest can buy
about 5 trophy packages at $50 per package.  They can get a bunch of
discounted kits at the local hobby shops (their sponsors) for the door
prizes.  You can buy about 1,000 flyers for about that much money.  And
there are a bunch of other things a club can do with $150 for a contest
instead of paying for judges and feeding them.

That was the economic aspect of the matter.  The resentment that will be
felt by the local judges and judges from other clubs is priceless.  You can
be sure that they will not participate in future activities from that/those
clubs.

But there is a plus to all of this.  The one thing that one can do is
volunteer to be an at-large judge at different events within your state or
Region.  I live in Austin, Texas (where else would anyone want to be) (IPMS
Region 6), and I travel to San Antonio to assist with their judging.  I
have also traveled (driven) to Beaumont, TX; Norman, Oklahoma; and
Louisiana (forgot the name of the town) to do the same.  I did not expect
to get any freebies, just the satisfaction of assisting other clubs achieve
their goals of putting on a good show and have fun.  One thing, be the best
judge you can be, be honest, fair and objective when judging.  Only you
know how good, great you are - judge like you are trying to select the best
model of the ones you have made in the last couple of years.  Not an easy
task.  If you do that, you will earn the respect of other judges and
eventually and with time, you will be called upon to participate in the
judging their contests.

You can go it alone, or car pool.  For me the average trip comes out to
about $200 for an over-niter (that includes gas, food and hotel) and about
$50 if I come drive back the same day.  I don't want to mention how much
the purchases come out to because that is a story for another time.  I have
met some rally good guys and made some good friends over the years.

Sooooo, having said this, I think the best way to go would be to be an
at-large judge and do some traveling.  It is a beautiful country this land
or ours.

Ray
Austin, Texas
===

>  Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Stretch
Pip Moss - 26 Aug 2005 18:41 GMT
I agree with what Ray has to say (below), and I would add that the single
best way to ensure fair judging is to involve members of as many different
clubs as possible. Realistically, this is going to happen by inviting
members of other clubs beforehand to come and be judges, and by appealing as
strongly as possible to attendees at the show to be judges. Then, the head
judge must do his/her best to put together judging teams, each of which
includes members of at least two, and hopefully several different clubs. By
doing this, the host club will offer the best chance of fair judging, and it
will gain a reputation for holding contests without any home-club bias.

Pip Moss

> Stretch,
> As much as I hate to do this, I'm going to have to burst your bubble.  A
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>>
>> Stretch
Andrew - 27 Aug 2005 03:42 GMT
Stretch, my 2c worth here is that you have the right idea (but as Pip and
Ray are saying) not quite the right slant on it. If you change your judging
club that asks for free lunch and admission into a judging pool that offers
to judge and mentor local judges in the best way then it may take off. Rays
right in that most clubs will want value for money, and may see better value
in spending the $150 odd on prizes and trophies; but if they see that the
$150 odd is being put into their members and building their skills then they
may be more amenable to the idea.

One final thing, calling it a 'judging club' will put about 50% of modellers
and clubs off instantly, it will be seen as an elitist 'we know better than
you do idiots' group. If you promote it as a resource for all clubs and give
it a name that shows it to be a group of people who are at the service of
other clubs and genuinely want to help, you will get a far better hearing.

Hmm, inflation must have stopped, that was a good rant for 2c.

Andrew

>I agree with what Ray has to say (below), and I would add that the single
> best way to ensure fair judging is to involve members of as many different
[quoted text clipped - 123 lines]
>>>
>>> Stretch
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.