Ive just built a small 3DFoamy F15 and have set up elevons (ie
elevators do both pitch and role) and flaperons (ailerons do both pitch
and role)
...this was achived by mixing channels 1=>2 & 2=>1 (which gave the
elevons) and then just connect the right elevon servo to the left
aileron servo (via Y lead) and vica versa.
Lots of aircraft use flaperons, but my worry is that since the wing on
an F15 is quite deep the flaperons are quite near the back of the
aircraft and so when the flaperon goes down (for up elevator) it might
cause a nose down pitch - like it would with a delta?
Does anyone know of any model F15s that use flaperons? - Does the full
size use flaperons?
Thanks
David Bevan
http://www.davidbevan.co.uk
Nemo - 28 Aug 2005 14:15 GMT
> Ive just built a small 3DFoamy F15 and have set up elevons (ie
> elevators do both pitch and role) and flaperons (ailerons do both pitch
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> David Bevan
> http://www.davidbevan.co.uk
Hi, David.
The F-15 uses a tailplane. When using a tailplane (empennage), the balance
point of the wing is much further back from the leading edge than on a full
delta airplane (no empennage). This causes the control surfaces at the
trailing edge of the wing to provide a different kind of function (fulcrum)
than one would imagine.
Even though they look similar, they behave differently.
Ed Cregger
Alan Dicey - 28 Aug 2005 22:15 GMT
> Does anyone know of any model F15s that use flaperons? - Does the full
> size use flaperons?
The F-15 control surfaces are ailerons, rudders and stabilators. Stick
and pedal inputs are mixed in the hydromechanical flight control system
so that all surfaces, ailerons, stabilators and rudders, deflect
appropriately when roll is commanded. Pitch control is by stabilators
and yaw by rudders.
http://www.f15sim.com/operation/f15_hydro_mech.html
http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f15_2.html
Nemanja Vukicevic - 29 Aug 2005 14:46 GMT
> [snip] ...but my worry is that since the wing on
> an F15 is quite deep the flaperons are quite near the back of the
> aircraft and so when the flaperon goes down (for up elevator) it might
> cause a nose down pitch - like it would with a delta?
Sir,
Length of the wing's chord and the position of the wing are not
relevant.
The wing of statically stable aircraft produces in addition to lift and
drag
aerodynamic torque tendig to decrease pitch, that torque is countered
by
force generated on the horizontal tail. When both flaperons as
deflected
down they will act as plain flaps and will cause a nose down pitch that
will have to be countered by changing the incidence of the horizontal
tail.
If I understood correctly the comands on Your model have been coupled
i.e.
aileron and tailplanes both deflect differentially for roll control and
when
tail is used for pitch control flaps are lowered or deflected upward.
Coupling of ailerons and tailplane should improve rate of roll and
differential
tailplane is used on actual F-15 to improve roll control at high AoA.
However coupling of flaperons and tail (tail down and flaperons up for
pitch up)
will decrease wing's lift and increase drag significantly and could
cause a stall.
In the other case (tail up and flaperons down for pitch down) high
negative loads
are possible because the wing torque may not be enough to counter the
pitch down
that will keep increasing as long as the comand is held.
I think that such an arrangement will decrease controllability of the
model.
The other possibility (flaperons down and tail down for pitch up) will
have an
adverse effect on the rate of pitch, the torque produced by the tail
will be reduced
by that from the flaperons in addition flaperons will increase the drag
significantly,
reduce speed and thus impare the rate of pitch even further.
This will cause the model to act more like an F-5 (sluggish in pitch,
excellent roll).
Flaps are used only when extra lift is needed at a cost of increased
thrust needed
e.g. reducing the landing speed and boosting maneuverability at lower
speeds.
If possible flight test and please post results.
Nemanja Vukicevic
aeronautical engineering student
Alan Dicey - 29 Aug 2005 21:29 GMT
> Ive just built a small 3DFoamy F15 and have set up elevons (ie
> elevators do both pitch and role) and flaperons (ailerons do both pitch
> and role)
The term elevon is only really appropriate to tailless delta's, where
the trailing edge controls must combine both elevator and aileron
functions. On an aircraft with all-moving dual-purpose tailplanes, they
are usually called stabilators although tailerons has also been used.
Flaperons are ailerons that can also droop together as part of the flap
function, often used in conjunction with leading-edge droops to provide
the effect of variable camber. Flaperons have nothing to do with pitch
control. Deflecting both ailerons in the same direction on an F-15
wing, being close to the center of pressure, will probably cause an
increase or decrease in lift and a direct translational force up or
down, rather than a change in pitch.
The F-15 is a tailed delta, with a large wing and low wing loading
leading to high maneuverability. The wing employs simple flaps inboard
of plain ailerons. There are not even any leading-edge droops or slats,
the wing design avoiding these complications.
John Weiss - 29 Aug 2005 21:56 GMT
"Alan Dicey" <alan@removethis.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk> wrote...
> Flaperons are ailerons that can also droop together as part of the flap
> function, often used in conjunction with leading-edge droops to provide
> the effect of variable camber. Flaperons have nothing to do with pitch
> control.
Definitions vary. The roll control spoilers on the A-6 Intruder and EA-6B
Prowler are also called Flaperons; no flap function, no droop or downward
deflection...
Allen Epps - 29 Aug 2005 23:31 GMT
> "Alan Dicey" <alan@removethis.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk> wrote...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Prowler are also called Flaperons; no flap function, no droop or downward
> deflection...
Which is why we only did flaperon rolls, were the jet rolls around a
wing tip instead of aileron rolls vice the centerline for those that
care.
Pugs
Don Stauffer - 30 Aug 2005 14:49 GMT
> Which is why we only did flaperon rolls, were the jet rolls around a
> wing tip instead of aileron rolls vice the centerline for those that
> care.
>
> Pugs
Is a flaperon roll the same as a barrel roll?
Roger Conroy - 31 Aug 2005 09:04 GMT
>> Which is why we only did flaperon rolls, were the jet rolls around a wing
>> tip instead of aileron rolls vice the centerline for those that care.
>>
>> Pugs
>
> Is a flaperon roll the same as a barrel roll?
As I understand it the axis of a barrel roll lies parallel and "above" the
centreline of the aircraft. The plane of the wings is tangential to the
"circle" of the roll.
I've never seen one, but it seems to me that a flaperon roll would have the
plane of the wings rotating radially around the roll axis - which is located
on a wingtip.
Corrections and clarifications welcome
Roger
junk1@davidbevan.co.uk - 31 Aug 2005 11:31 GMT
OK, thanks everyone for your answers and opinions, I test flew the
model the other day and as I expected the additional lift generated by
the flaperons going down was outweighed by the nose down pitch that
having the flaperons so far from the CofG caused and full up elevator
(down flaperon) resulted in a nose down pitch.
Luckly I was able to switch the flaperon mixing on/off in flight and so
land the model safely.
Thanks
David Bevan
http://www.davidbevan.co.uk