Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Alternate SEA Gunships

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frank - 15 Sep 2005 15:49 GMT
A while back I posted a question about the proposed AC-97X prior to
the AC-130. Somewhere, someone responded about a USAF study back then
considering C-131s, C-118s & several others, IIRC. I've googled but
can't find that response. Anyone remember? Thanks.
Norm Filer - 15 Sep 2005 19:01 GMT
>  A while back I posted a question about the proposed AC-97X prior to
> the AC-130. Somewhere, someone responded about a USAF study back then
> considering C-131s, C-118s & several others, IIRC. I've googled but
> can't find that response. Anyone remember? Thanks.

Several other aircraft types were considered, including the C-54,
C-97,C-118,C-121 and the Navy P-2. Some of the reasons all of these
were eliminated from Air Force consideration were lack of a high wing,
which allowed much better visibility in the banking turn needed to bring
the guns and sight to bear on the target, or in the case of the C-97,
poor maneuverability at low altitude and airspeeds.

A C-131 was used early in the gunship program to determine the
feasibility of the whole idea of flying around in a circle and firing
guns out the side of the A/C.  It was never intended to use the C-131 as
an operational gunship, it was a test platform only.  At the time of
these early tests the whole concept was considered a wild idea and
suffered from lack of official support and funding.

Two other A/C actually reached the hardware stage as mini gunships, and
actually did go so far as to be evaluated in Viet Nam.  These were the
AU-23 Fairchild Peacemaker and AU-24 Helio Stallion.  They were intended
       for South Viet Nam use and those programs were delayed due to
problems with both funding and airframes.  They died with the end of the
war and the aircraft went to the bone yard.

All of the above is from "The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia,
Development and Employment of Fixed-Wing Gunships 1962-1972"  Office of
Air Force History.

 As with many of these non conventional ideas, if it hadn't been for a
small group of junior officers who could see the potential and kept the
concept alive despite all the official obstacles, it is doubtful if the
gunship program would have ever happened.

Norm
Old Timer - 15 Sep 2005 22:51 GMT
Wasn't there also a Fairchild AC-119?
Dave Williams - 15 Sep 2005 23:59 GMT
> Wasn't there also a Fairchild AC-119?

Yes, but it wasn't a test project.  If was actually put into production as
"Gunship 3", in two forms; the AC-119G Shadow and AC-119K Stinger.

Gunship 1 was the AC-47, which, while successful for the concept, was
underpowered and small, limiting weapons, ammo, and sensor capability.
Plus, there were few C-47s still in the US military, which meant a limited
parts and maintenance capability.  Gunship 2, the AC-130 was the much better
solution.  The AC-130s only real issue was that there was a much greater
need for cargo C-130s at the time, limiting the number available for
conversion.  The C-119 was selected as it was newer than the C-47, and thus
more maintainable, and more importantly was large enough to carry sufficient
guns, ammo, and sensors.

The Shadow was essentially like the AC-47, mainly intended to support Troops
in Contact (TIC) and carried only miniguns and simple night vision
equipment.  The jet-boosted Stinger was optimized for the interdiction
missions like the Spectre, and added 20mm cannon and advanced sensors and
targeting equipment.

Dave
William H. Shuey - 16 Sep 2005 04:41 GMT
> Wasn't there also a Fairchild AC-119?

Yes:

    Yestor's/Italerii has issued a 1/72 scale kit for that bird.

                            Bill Shuey
Mad-Modeller - 16 Sep 2005 06:10 GMT
> > Wasn't there also a Fairchild AC-119?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>                                                         Bill Shuey

Yep, right after I converted an Aurora kit (1/76).

Bill Banaszak, MFE
frank - 16 Sep 2005 00:30 GMT
Is that pub available online? Thanks for the tip. Darn it, now a Connie
gunship!!!!!! :)
Ralf Hetzer - 17 Sep 2005 09:39 GMT
Hello

>Is that pub available online? Thanks for the tip. Darn it, now a Connie
>gunship!!!!!! :)

After I take a look at google trying with AC-47 some links may be
interesting:

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/vietnam/index.htm

deeper:
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a6/attack6.htm

Back in the 80ties I saw a picture in AERO Magazine where an AC-130
shots in the night with "light track ammo". Very impressive  

Hth
Ralf
Drew Hill - 16 Sep 2005 08:18 GMT
> A while back I posted a question about the proposed AC-97X prior to
> the AC-130. Somewhere, someone responded about a USAF study back then
> considering C-131s, C-118s & several others, IIRC. I've googled but
> can't find that response. Anyone remember? Thanks.

The book mentioned (dev. and employment... etc) is the ultimate
source for all things gunship in Vietnam.  There is also men-
tioned the suggestion that they could mount an M-60 SAW/LMG into
an O-2.  I have seen a picture in a book "Vietnam Warbirds" and
which I do not have in front of me as it's in my household goods
enroute to me in Guam!  The caption for the photo is that there
is no information as to whether this worked.  The book mentioned
previously (dev. and employment... etc.) implies that this was
never tried.

This could easily be done in 1/72 scale with the Airfix O-2 kit
and one of the M-60's from the Italeri UH-60 Desert Hawk or the
AMT/Italeri M-60 "Blazer" tank kit.  I've always wanted to give
it a shot, never bothered to get aorund to doing it.

As far as I know the DoD publication is not yet available on-
line, but is normally easily available at any good college or
university which has a government documents depository in its
library.  The Vietnam Warbirds book is not available to the
best of my knowledge.  That doesn't mean that it's NOT avail-
able, just that I don't know.

Hope this helps!
Moi - 16 Sep 2005 08:55 GMT
>> A while back I posted a question about the proposed AC-97X prior to
>> the AC-130. Somewhere, someone responded about a USAF study back then
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Hope this helps!

So I took my Modelcraft 172 and added the refueling probe, aerials, and the
miniguns and a couple bombs from an A-37 and viola... the A-41E.  I dubbed
it the "Wraith" and gave it a nice SEA paint job.  Fun idea and while maybe
impractical (as one guy said in response to my ABMS post "I hear the sound
of a wing snapping"), a nice build none the less.  I figured if the Army was
already putting around in the T-41B, why not?

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.
frank - 16 Sep 2005 17:37 GMT
That DOD pub isn't online, but it's a book, apparently published in
1982 as such. Found a couple of copies. Thanks for the help.
Jim Williams - 16 Sep 2005 18:09 GMT
Many moons back there was a whimsical set of posts covering the evolution of
the YB-49.  I think that someone suggested a gunship variant.

In the BUFF community, we joked about a B-52 with a belly full of Miniguns.

Kind of off the topic, but I suppose that we will all survive.

Jim
Moi - 16 Sep 2005 20:22 GMT
> Many moons back there was a whimsical set of posts covering the evolution
> of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Jim

Regarding the -52, forget not one of the B-54 setups with all those machine
guns pointing straight-down.

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.
frank - 16 Sep 2005 21:18 GMT
Wouldn't the B-54 be going a bit backwards? Wasn't that the further
upgraded B-50?
Moi - 17 Sep 2005 09:21 GMT
Sorry... I meant B-57.   I blame the cat.

Signature

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.

> Wouldn't the B-54 be going a bit backwards? Wasn't that the further
> upgraded B-50?
Martin - 21 Sep 2005 10:50 GMT
>>Sorry... I meant B-57.   I blame the cat.

Is that the Canberra?

If so it would help to know
Moi - 21 Sep 2005 12:58 GMT
It is the American built version/designation of the Canberra, yeah.

Signature

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.

>>>Sorry... I meant B-57.   I blame the cat.
>
> Is that the Canberra?
>
> If so it would help to know
frank - 22 Sep 2005 00:48 GMT
  I think the B-57 was called the Intruder.

> It is the American built version/designation of the Canberra, yeah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > If so it would help to know
Mad-Modeller - 22 Sep 2005 06:10 GMT
>    I think the B-57 was called the Intruder.

Technically you are correct but I've never heard anyone call it that.

Bill Banaszak, MFE
Moi - 22 Sep 2005 07:20 GMT
And it really gets Navy guys' goat up.

Signature

Rich Cox
--------------------------------------------------------------
À la gloire éternelle de l'infanterie...
miroite le nommé de RodgerYoung.

>>
>>    I think the B-57 was called the Intruder.
>
> Technically you are correct but I've never heard anyone call it that.
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE
Martin - 22 Sep 2005 10:54 GMT
>>It is the American built version/designation of the Canberra, yeah.

Thanks

There are too many B numbers to remember - much easier to use the names!
guardian6@comcast.net - 19 Sep 2005 16:30 GMT
[stuff snipped]

> Regarding the -52, forget not one of the B-54 setups with all those machine
> guns pointing straight-down.

One of the original concepts for the ACH-47A "Guns-a-Go-Go" was a bunch
of weaponry firing through open ports in the bottom.

John Hairell (tpn18@yahoo.com)
maiesm72@netscape.com - 20 Sep 2005 06:32 GMT
This is a great thread.

RMS has a great internal source.

Hugh, are you following this.

What does The Shadow know?

Tom
Nick Pedley - 17 Sep 2005 20:23 GMT
> Many moons back there was a whimsical set of posts covering the evolution of
> the YB-49.  I think that someone suggested a gunship variant.

Does this help?
http://www.ninfinger.org/~sven/models/rms_tips/b49alt.hist.html
http://www.geocities.com/qcsms/articles/more_flyingwing.html
http://www.geocities.com/qcsms/articles/naval_b35.html
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HighFlier/boomerang.htm

Nick
news.verizon.net - 18 Sep 2005 00:53 GMT
I've been toying with the idea of getting a Dynavector A2D Skyshark and
putting that in VNAF colors with a minigun in the fuselage, or better yet
pivoting gun pods on the wings....

kww

: A while back I posted a question about the proposed AC-97X prior to
: the AC-130. Somewhere, someone responded about a USAF study back then
: considering C-131s, C-118s & several others, IIRC. I've googled but
: can't find that response. Anyone remember? Thanks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.