While I strongly suspect I am wasting my time, I do have a bit to waste so
here goes;
>Why the hub bub? I simply believe the E-board needs to meet far more
>often than every 7 months.
Do you KNOW that they have not met in the past seven months? Just because
the minutes have not been made public
is not proof they have not met.
>As membership is dropping everyday, they should be meeting weekly in an
effort to do something about it.
What is your source for this claim? How do you know membership is dropping
every day?
>After all, they seem to raise the rates everytime they get together to
cover the losses.
What losses? The dues were recently raised for the first time in several
years. The last financial report I saw clearly showed a pretty healthy
reserve. The last convention was a booming success both financially and in
attendance.
>And last, I see no reason to post my IPMS/USA membership number, as the
one guy said, this isn't an official IPMS/USA forum.
Aw come on! Get brave! Put down the proof that you are really a dues
paying member of IPMS USA.
>Remember, you pay due's,
Yep, I do. And have since the very beginning. IPMS number is 146.
> if the leadership consists of do nothing
>types, then the IPMS/USA will certainly fail.
We've been around since the early 1960's and I am sure there are no "do
nothing types" in the current e-board. While we have indeed had some slow
times, and these are not times of rapid growth in the model industry, I
really doubt if we will be disappearing any time soon.
OK here is my bottom line; Since you appear to be mostly just BS and
innuendo, if you really care about this issue why don't you drop Dave (IPMS
USA President) an email dmorrissette@comcast.net and ask him these burning
questions. Then be sure to report back to us with what he has to say.
Until you have some facts, I will no longer waste any more time with this
silliness.
Norm
maiesm72@netscape.com - 30 Nov 2005 00:00 GMT
Good reply, Norm.
Sounding more and more like Stinkey.
Maybe he got his mother to post t for hm?
Tom
What's your IPMS member number, Skip?

Signature
Cheers: Bill Woodier
IPMS 24645
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready
in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
My Home Page: http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--
> Why the hub bub? I simply believe the E-board needs to meet far more
> often than every 7 months.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Skip
Bill Woodier - 29 Nov 2005 23:44 GMT
No reply, Skipster? Wassamatter, superglue your fingers together? Ya don't
have an IPMS number, do ya. I thought not. G-bye.

Signature
Cheers: Bill Woodier
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready
in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
My Home Page: http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--
> What's your IPMS member number, Skip?
>> Why the hub bub? I simply believe the E-board needs to meet far more
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Skip
skippy1> Why the hub bub? I simply believe the E-board needs to
skippy1> meet far more often than every 7 months. As membership
skippy1> is dropping everyday, they should be meeting weekly in an
skippy1> effort to do something about it. After all, they seem to
skippy1> raise the rates everytime they get together to cover the
skippy1> losses. And last, I see no reason to post my IPMS/USA
skippy1> membership number, as the one guy said, this isn't an
skippy1> official IPMS/USA forum.
skippy1> Remember, you pay due's, if the leadership consists of do
skippy1> nothing types, then the IPMS/USA will certainly fail.
The idea of IPMS/USA failing sounds so ludicrous, I cannot believe it
is not a fantasy! Seriously though, if there is a core membership
distributed throughout clubs, then how can the body itself fail? After
all, IPMS is so loosely bound that clubs have a lot of leeway in how
they structure themselves and relate to their peers. This implies that
go-getters in those clubs will find each other and organize something,
merely so as not to be embarassed by national attempts. And guess
what? Other members will be attracted to those go-getters. From r.m.s
postings alone it is clear there are plenty of active and enthusiastic
members. And I have not heard of any nationals being called
'failures'. As for disagreements, well sure, any organization greater
than 150 people that still tries to run as a single body is in for
loads of fan-spat excrement. :-)

Signature
G Hassenpflug /* IJN & JMSDF */
Skip:
We have had two E-board meetings (July and Sept as required by the
Bylaws and one other meeting) and our Secretary has just now typed the
minutes. That is our mistake and it got lost in the shuffle. They
should be up in the next week. Not much going on except for the
upcoming new officers.
As for failing- what a laugh! Membership is going up. Convention was
the largest ever any where in the world, things are great all the way
around.
Dave Morrissette
President, IPMS/USA
maiesm72@netscape.com - 30 Nov 2005 19:46 GMT
Thank you, Dave.
It appears that "Skip"'s posts were just more nonsense, just like the
Crapster.
Y'think that there are two of them out there?
Doubtful, even discusting, thought.
How about some posts to alt.binaries showing some of your work, "Skip"?
Tom
Bill Woodier - 01 Dec 2005 02:48 GMT
Thanks for the update on the E-board, Dave. However, in this case I think
you're talking into the wind; this guy's "JAFT."

Signature
Cheers: Bill Woodier
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready
in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
My Home Page: http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--
> Skip:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Dave Morrissette
> President, IPMS/USA
maiesm72@netscape.com - 01 Dec 2005 19:00 GMT
And it seems that he crawled back under his bridge.
Tom
skippy1@earthdome.com - 07 Dec 2005 02:06 GMT
Dave, the report is lame. It lacks details. Nothing from the treasurer
because that would expose the low bank account.
Face it, the boys in Phoenix nearly caused a bankruptcy, and falling
membership is something that is spiralling out of control.
The simple fact of not posting a treasurers report says that I am
correct.
This reply from you is a weak attempt to appear calm in the face of
demise.
Skip
Norm Filer - 07 Dec 2005 03:00 GMT
Skippy Dippy--
So far you have not provided one supportable fact. How about some numbers
to support the following BS?
a. Financial losses at Phoenix?
b. Numbers in the current IPMS USA Bank accounts?
c. Declining "out of control" membership?
Since you appear to be privy to all these items, how about sharing them?
The man answered you like a gentlemen, Why don't you either provide a few
provable facts or better yet, just go away.
Norm
maiesm72@netscape.com - 07 Dec 2005 07:09 GMT
Yep, it's Stinkey all right.
The orignal post may have been hs mom, if she'll have anything to do
with him.
Now he's back in form.
So...plonk.
Tom
dmorrissette@comcast.net - 07 Dec 2005 21:19 GMT
Dennis (now I am sure):
Phoenix cleared about $6000 and taking out the E-baord expenses
(trophies we subsidize and the like), IPMS netted about $2700. This is
great and Atlanta is coming (and they are going to be profitable too).
IPMS is doing fine and there are some other things going on we hope to
announce prior to me leaving office in February that will make things
even better.
Dave Morrissette
Kaliste Saloom - 07 Dec 2005 22:51 GMT
> Dennis (now I am sure):
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dave Morrissette
Dave,
You and the other members of the Eboard have been a good steward for our
society.
Thanks.
Kaliste

Signature
Kaliste Saloom
IPMS #30703
Lafayette, LA USA
Bill Woodier - 08 Dec 2005 00:40 GMT
As I noted before, if you're not an IPMS member, nothing in the IPMS report
is of any business to you. The fact you will not provide (probably because
you don't have one) your IPMS number sort of says it all, doesn't it
skipster. My IPMS number is proudly provided below

Signature
Cheers: Bill Woodier
IPMS 24645
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready
in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
My Home Page: http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--
> Dave, the report is lame. It lacks details. Nothing from the treasurer
> because that would expose the low bank account.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Skip