
Signature
Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968
My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.
Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://www.network54.com/realm/modeleral/
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."
So blue was official, but was black more predominantly substituted?
Al Superczynski - 07 May 2006 11:53 GMT
>So blue was official, but was black more predominantly substituted?
Beats the hell out of me, Frank. I was an Air Force brat during
those years but never paid any attention to that... :(

Signature
Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968
My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.
Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://www.network54.com/realm/modeleral/
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."
Thanks! That's just what I needed to know. Generally, the lettering looks
black to me in the colour photographs that I've seen but Insignia Blue is
such a dark blue that the difference in colour might not show up very
clearly. I'll look more closely in future.
Do you know if these markings were applied in the factory or by the Air
Force? Would the factories have adhered to the Insignia Blue as specified
with the black being used later when aircraft were repainted or did the
manufacturers use black for convenience or cheapness?
Gordon McLaughlin
>>Does anyone know with certainty what colour the USAF lettering on natural
>>metal finished aircraft was?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> always the answer is to work from photos of the actual a/c one is
> modeling if possible.
Norm Filer - 07 May 2006 19:36 GMT
Al is of course correct regarding the 1-1-4 reference.
In my four years of Air Force (TAC) service, I do not recall ever seeing one
of our F-100s or F-104s in anything but Blue markings. I was a modeler and
a photographer (when I could) even then, so I did pay attention to the
markings.
They were of course delivered from the factory or overhaul facility in the
correct markings, right down to the skin rash called extensive stenciling.
After delivery, all the painting was done by our maint. troops and it was
done with considerable pride and according to regulations. That all changed
somewhat in the winter of 1959 when TAC headquarters dictated that all
individual markings must be removed and they would all look identical. Unit
pride suffered a bit after that.
Also as mentioned in a previous note on this subject, the Blue is so dark
that it would appear to be Black in anything but excellent light. Another
item worth noting is that a lot of the slides shot during these years was
Kodachrome. I know all mine were. That film really does not have a true
Black. Thus it is very difficult to tell the difference with dark Blues and
Blacks.
Norm
Gordon McLaughlin - 07 May 2006 19:57 GMT
Thanks for the further information. I've been looking at colour photographs
taken in Korea during the war and it is almost always impossible to say
whether the lettering is blue or black. The same is often true of the star
and bars insignia themselves. There is sometimes a comparison to be made
with the buzz numbers which all seem to be black but it's difficult even
then.
One black and white photograph shows a Sabre on which the USAF on the wing
is clearly lighter than the buzz number and the same as the star and bars so
this one was blue.
As a rule of thumb, is it a safer bet to assume it's blue in your opinion?
Gordon McLaughlin
> Al is of course correct regarding the 1-1-4 reference.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Norm
Norm Filer - 07 May 2006 21:11 GMT
>As a rule of thumb, is it a safer bet to assume it's blue in your opinion?
>Gordon McLaughlin
Gordon, I still have reservations about a lot of the Korean War era stuff.
Many of the photos of that era sure do look a lot like Black, but by about
the mid 1950's, the color was clearly Blue.
Norm
The Collector - 07 May 2006 21:44 GMT
One possible way to tell the difference between blue and black
lettering in photos is to try to locate a "star and bar" insignia and a
black anti-glare panel on the same aircraft with the lettering. Try to
determine if the lettering shade looks more like the blue in the
insignia or the black on the anti-glare panel. This method has been
successful for me on occasion. Of course, if the anti-glare panel is
"olive drab" then you need to find some other black color reference
somewhere else on the airplane.
Martin
Don Stauffer - 08 May 2006 14:19 GMT
> Thanks for the further information. I've been looking at colour photographs
> taken in Korea during the war and it is almost always impossible to say
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> As a rule of thumb, is it a safer bet to assume it's blue in your opinion?
Lighter could also mean dark grey. Black paints chalk to a dark grey
pretty soon when planes are left out in sun and outdoor environment.
Such dark greys could be hard to differentiate from dark blue in a photo.
Al Superczynski - 08 May 2006 07:46 GMT
>Do you know if these markings were applied in the factory or by the Air
>Force?
At the factory, then touched up as needed in the field.
>Would the factories have adhered to the Insignia Blue as specified
>with the black being used later when aircraft were repainted or did the
>manufacturers use black for convenience or cheapness?
All the above and more, probably... ;-p

Signature
Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968
My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.
Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://www.network54.com/realm/modeleral/
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."