>yes, but i believe you understood my point.
Da. Afghanistan was a harsh enviornment and in the last few years,
the troops were poorly supplied and had low moral. The a/c got pretty
scruffy.
My comments were more for Daryl whose Pete was said to be
over-weathered. Without seeing his model, it's hard to comment
accurately, but this could be a valid observation. The Pete was not
all metal. The wings aft of the rear spar and the conrtrol surfaces
were fabric. He could easily have applied his worn-to-bare-metal
technique to inappropriate areas. Japanese paint did seem to have very
poor adhesion, but photos suggest that it flaked off in chips in high
traffic areas rather than wore through. Another point is that the
paint would likely be badly faded on an a/c showing heavy weathering.
Greg
Daryl - 04 Jun 2006 04:04 GMT
>>yes, but i believe you understood my point.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Greg
No I said I entered a Hasegawa Rufe
>entered a Hasegawa Rufe in an IPMS regional contest a few years back when I
>1st experimented with weathering I used ref from a book on Zeros, a Pete
>is a biplane, most of the sever weathering was restricted to the floats and
>underside of the wings and fuselage were water would have beat on it
e - 04 Jun 2006 05:04 GMT
>>yes, but i believe you understood my point.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Greg
gotcha, and i believe you're correct about that.
and of course, you cannot please judges easily nor well.