The AirDoc F-4 decal sheet instructions claim that the Europe-1 camouflage
is simply SEA camouflage with the Tan 30219 replaced by Charcoal Gray 36081.
This has been borne out by a number of people whith whom I have
corresponded. That would make the full spec 36081/34102/34079.
On the other hand, the Two Bobs sheet 72-048 shows two RF-4Cs in what
appears to be the Euro-1 scheme, but claims that the colours are
36118/34102/34092.
Which is correct? Or, were there two subtly different versions of the
scheme, one used in Europe and one in Japan?

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
JJ - 14 Jun 2006 23:04 GMT
The Two Bobs sheet is incorrect! The correct colours for F-4s are
36081/34102/34079.
HTH

Signature
JJ
> The AirDoc F-4 decal sheet instructions claim that the Europe-1 camouflage
> is simply SEA camouflage with the Tan 30219 replaced by Charcoal Gray
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Which is correct? Or, were there two subtly different versions of the
> scheme, one used in Europe and one in Japan?
Enzo Matrix - 15 Jun 2006 08:09 GMT
> The Two Bobs sheet is incorrect! The correct colours for F-4s are
> 36081/34102/34079.
Thanks JJ!

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
JJ - 15 Jun 2006 08:53 GMT
You're welcome Enzo.
You could also check out www.amarc.dk -> F-4 -> Colours (scroll down and you
will find the Euro I scheme).
Regards,

Signature
JJ
>> The Two Bobs sheet is incorrect! The correct colours for F-4s are
>> 36081/34102/34079.
>
> Thanks JJ!
ian collins - 15 Jun 2006 19:00 GMT
Two Bobs are right! regards Ian U.K.
> The AirDoc F-4 decal sheet instructions claim that the Europe-1 camouflage
> is simply SEA camouflage with the Tan 30219 replaced by Charcoal Gray 36081.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Which is correct? Or, were there two subtly different versions of the
> scheme, one used in Europe and one in Japan?
Enzo Matrix - 15 Jun 2006 19:20 GMT
> Two Bobs are right! regards Ian U.K.
OK.... now I'm totally confused!

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
JJ - 15 Jun 2006 19:43 GMT
Enzo,
There's no need to be confused. Ian simply repeated an often seen error.
Fact is, the Euro I scheme was different from aircraft type to aircraft
type, e.g. the A-7D/Ks were 34079/36081, A-10s were 34092/34102/36081.
Regards,

Signature
JJ
>> Two Bobs are right! regards Ian U.K.
>
> OK.... now I'm totally confused!
Enzo Matrix - 15 Jun 2006 22:05 GMT
> Enzo,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> aircraft type, e.g. the A-7D/Ks were 34079/36081, A-10s were
> 34092/34102/36081.
Now there's something *else* I didn't know... It makes the study of
camouflage all the more interesting.

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
JJ - 15 Jun 2006 22:36 GMT
Enzo,
It gets more complicated than that. The SAC version used 36081/36118/34086
(B-1s, B-52s and FB-111As), while MAC used 34092/34102/36118 (C-5s, C-130s
and C-141s) - the latter combination was also used on USAF helicopters.
OV-10s and A-10 (as well as experimental F-16s) used 34092/34102/36081.
HTH,

Signature
JJ
>> Enzo,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Now there's something *else* I didn't know... It makes the study of
> camouflage all the more interesting.
JJ - 15 Jun 2006 19:26 GMT
No, in this instance Two Bobs is wrong!
The specified colours for the F-4 are 36081/34102/34079.

Signature
JJ
> Two Bobs are right! regards Ian U.K.
>> The AirDoc F-4 decal sheet instructions claim that the Europe-1
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> Which is correct? Or, were there two subtly different versions of the
>> scheme, one used in Europe and one in Japan?
Jessie C - 15 Jun 2006 23:43 GMT
> No, in this instance Two Bobs is wrong!
>
> The specified colours for the F-4 are 36081/34102/34079.
Although it doesn't help that the grey weathered very rapidly, and could
end up looking like -018 to -118 and every shade in between.
In the end, put on the colour that looks right to you. You probably can't
be proven to be wrong.

Signature
Jessica
Ian Maw - 16 Jun 2006 04:05 GMT
Actually, Nobody is wrong
Stripping and refinishing an aircraft is time consuming and expensive. When
the Euro-1 scheme came out, airframes with thier already painted surfaces in
good repair, merely had one of thier colours oversprayed. I'm sure that when
a total repaint was eventually required, it was done to the specified
standard.
Ian
>> No, in this instance Two Bobs is wrong!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In the end, put on the colour that looks right to you. You probably can't
> be proven to be wrong.