Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

eBay problem, your opinion, please

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frank - 19 Jun 2006 18:23 GMT
   I just won an eBay auction for an Aurora kit I've wanted for a
while. I've dealt with the seller off-eBay since back in the '80s with
no problems. I've bought from him on eBay for the last couple of years,
again, with no problems. His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
was $8 & First Class was FREE. Yes, FREE. I sent him an email & told
him I needed his addy & that I'd take the FREE First Class, but I
wanted insurance. He sent me an invoice with the $8 on it & a separate
email saying that he was sorry for the confusion, but shipping isn't
free. I told him he needed to go read the auction, because that's what
he offered. He the sent me an email saying something about when he
filled out the auction & put $0.00 somewhere, he thought, blah, blah,
blah & again apologized for the confusion & sort of smart-assed stated
that out of 72 auctions, I, & 2 others were confused. I responded that
I'd "pay the postage, but........", & that there's nothing to be
confused about regarding the word "FREE". I've printed off & high
lighted the pertinant portions of the auction & enclosed them with my
payment & asked him to please explain why _I_ am confused about the
postage, when I'm really confused about why he won't honor his auction.
He's got 99.9% positive FB (same as me) & about 3000 comments, again,
about the same as me. My thought is when the kit arrives, IF he hasn't
refunded the postage, the best I could give him is a Neutral & explain
why. Of course, I 'really' think I should give him a Negative, but
apologize & explain why. I'd like some input, please. BTW, I sell some
stuff, usually models, & if I had made that 'mistake', you can bet your
butts I'd honor "FREE" postage!
C.R. Krieger - 19 Jun 2006 19:29 GMT
> I just won an eBay auction for an Aurora kit I've wanted for a
> while. I've dealt with the seller off-eBay since back in the '80s with
> no problems.

> His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
> was $8 & First Class was FREE.

> He the sent me an email saying something about when he
> filled out the auction & put $0.00 somewhere, he thought, blah, blah,
> blah & again apologized for the confusion & sort of smart-assed stated
> that out of 72 auctions, I, & 2 others were confused.

> BTW, I sell some
> stuff, usually models, & if I had made that 'mistake', you can bet your
> butts I'd honor "FREE" postage!

As would I.  So let's look at what's gained here: A model you want and
a relationship going back almost 20 years.  What's to be lost?  $8 and
said relationship.

Is it compromise time?  Is the kit worth an extra $4 (probably a little
less than actual shipping will cost) to you?  I'd find out if he'll
split the difference or if he wants to be a jerk.  If it's the former,
nobody's too happy and nobody's too unhappy.  If it's the latter, I'd
send the $8, give him negative feedback, and forget him.  Just some
thoughts.
--
C.R. Krieger
VoicesOn@gmail.com - 19 Jun 2006 19:38 GMT
Personally, I think you might be taking advantage of an honest mistake
in his listing.  Having sold over 200 items myself on eBay, I
absolutley see how it can happen.  I'v almost done it myself, but
caught my mistake at the last moment.  And if you think of it, does it
make sense for him to charge $8 for Priority Mail and zero for 1st
class?  What is the marketing strategy in that?

Now I would believe you if you said that you really did think that this
was a bonafide offer by him.  I don't mean to imply that you knowingly
bid intending to take advantage of an honest mistake.  That is why I
agree with the other opinion that you should split the difference with
the seller.  As a seller (and buyer) of many auctions, that's my
opinion about what is fair.

All the best,

Tom Test

> > I just won an eBay auction for an Aurora kit I've wanted for a
> > while. I've dealt with the seller off-eBay since back in the '80s with
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> --
> C.R. Krieger
Count DeMoney - 19 Jun 2006 20:50 GMT
If all you say is true and I was the seller, I would try to make some
kind of compromise.  The seller should show some responsibility for his
error and the buyer should be reasonably understanding.  The answer
lies somewhere between 0 and 8.  (:>
frank - 19 Jun 2006 21:37 GMT
    I would agree to a compromise. The seller should have offered such
& apologized for HIS mistake & definitely not act like it's MY fault
for asking for free shipping which HE offered. Unless someone here can
explain how I'm confused by the word "Free" in front of First Class
Postage.

> If all you say is true and I was the seller, I would try to make some
> kind of compromise.  The seller should show some responsibility for his
> error and the buyer should be reasonably understanding.  The answer
> lies somewhere between 0 and 8.  (:>
The Old Man - 19 Jun 2006 22:05 GMT
> I would agree to a compromise. The seller should have offered such
> & apologized for HIS mistake & definitely not act like it's MY fault
> for asking for free shipping which HE offered. Unless someone here can
> explain how I'm confused by the word "Free" in front of First Class
> Postage.

In a recent auction, I made a sale to Canada. I have been used to
charging $7.50 for Priority S&H, with insurance included, but with this
sale (first class with insurance) was about $12.00. I bit the bullet on
this one, but have included a caviat in my pre-recorded payment options
note so I hope I'll be covered in the future.
z - 22 Jun 2006 20:01 GMT
> I would agree to a compromise. The seller should have offered such
> & apologized for HIS mistake & definitely not act like it's MY fault
> for asking for free shipping which HE offered. Unless someone here can
> explain how I'm confused by the word "Free" in front of First Class
> Postage.

He could have canceled the auction and relisted correctly.
He could have edited the listing.
>From watching People's Court, it seems like if he'd offered free
shipping for a steam locomotive, he might have grounds to declare it an
obvious error, but free shipping on a model, not so much.
That said, coward that I am, I'd just not feedback him at all.

> > If all you say is true and I was the seller, I would try to make some
> > kind of compromise.  The seller should show some responsibility for his
> > error and the buyer should be reasonably understanding.  The answer
> > lies somewhere between 0 and 8.  (:>
frank - 23 Jun 2006 00:15 GMT
    He couldn't have canceled, it had already ended. Apparently he
realized his goof & offered to pay the postage. However, I in turn told
him I was sure he made an honest error, & offered to split the postage.
I suggested that he remove that line from his future auctions & he said
he did. Whether he realizes his exact mistake, I don't know.

> > I would agree to a compromise. The seller should have offered such
> > & apologized for HIS mistake & definitely not act like it's MY fault
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > > error and the buyer should be reasonably understanding.  The answer
> > > lies somewhere between 0 and 8.  (:>
frank - 19 Jun 2006 21:31 GMT
   I don't know what people's strategy is. I've bought from several
eBayers who offered free shipping on BIN items, where in reality, it
cost the seller money. I've bid on & won a number of auctions, models
or otherwise, where it stated free shipping of some sort but not
another. I chose the free method & there was no squabble about it. If
it was his mistake, he should abide by it & correct it in the future.
When I bid on it, I bid hoping to win, but I did note his free First
Class as opposed to $8 Priority. It's not like some of the SOBs who
offer something at $1 BIN & $50 shipping for a $10 item. I looked at
some, but not all, of his past auctions. He only offered one method of
shipping. I did see another where he offered the 2 methods, now whether
or not the buyer asked for the free postage, I don't know.

> Personally, I think you might be taking advantage of an honest mistake
> in his listing.  Having sold over 200 items myself on eBay, I
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> > --
> > C.R. Krieger
Wayne C. Morris - 20 Jun 2006 07:58 GMT
> His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
> was $8 & First Class was FREE. Yes, FREE.
[snip]
> He sent me an invoice with the $8 on it & a separate
> email saying that he was sorry for the confusion, but shipping isn't
> free. I told him he needed to go read the auction, because that's what
> he offered. He the sent me an email saying something about when he
> filled out the auction & put $0.00 somewhere, he thought, blah, blah,
> blah & again apologized for the confusion
[snip]
> I responded that
> I'd "pay the postage, but........", & that there's nothing to be
> confused about regarding the word "FREE".
[snip]
> & asked him to please explain why _I_ am confused about the
> postage, when I'm really confused about why he won't honor his auction.

If he phrased it as "I apologize for *the* confusion", he wasn't calling
*you* confused, he just meant that the *situation* was confused, that there
was a discrepancy between what you thought he was offering and what he
thought he had posted.

More importantly, though, I think it was IMPOSSIBLE to send the kit by
First Class mail, free or not.  I tested my smallest unbuilt kits (smaller
than any of the old Aurora kits I remember building in my childhood); when
packed in the smallest possible corrugated box, with a bare minimum of
bubble wrap or styrofoam peanuts, even the lightest one was at least 2
ounces too heavy to be sent by USPS First Class.

So he probably *couldn't* ship it First Class, free or not, which pretty
much negates the offer you saw on his auction page.  He had to use another
method, and all the other methods are either more expensive or slower than
a 13-ounce First Class parcel.

At any rate, you apparently decided that the model is worth at least $8
more than your winning bid, since you ended up paying what he asked for
shipping; you *could* have told him you were backing out on the grounds
that there was an error in the auction listing, and offered not to leave
any negative feedback if he agree to do likewise.
frank - 20 Jun 2006 13:39 GMT
   He did apologize for "the" confusion, & finished his email by
stating that "out of 72 auctions, only you and 2 others were confused".
Pretty clear to me. Or maybe that's how I misunderstood the word "free"
for First Class Postage. Whether he can actually ship it First Class is
irrelevant. I don't bargain with negatives. If I leave a deserved
negative, they're welcomed to do likewise to me.

> > His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
> > was $8 & First Class was FREE. Yes, FREE.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> that there was an error in the auction listing, and offered not to leave
> any negative feedback if he agree to do likewise.
z - 22 Jun 2006 20:04 GMT
> He did apologize for "the" confusion, & finished his email by
> stating that "out of 72 auctions, only you and 2 others were confused".
> Pretty clear to me. Or maybe that's how I misunderstood the word "free"
> for First Class Postage. Whether he can actually ship it First Class is
> irrelevant. I don't bargain with negatives. If I leave a deserved
> negative, they're welcomed to do likewise to me.

Split the difference and send it falsely labeled as Media Mail.

> > > His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
> > > was $8 & First Class was FREE. Yes, FREE.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> > that there was an error in the auction listing, and offered not to leave
> > any negative feedback if he agree to do likewise.
tomservo@clearwire.net - 20 Jun 2006 12:14 GMT
While I can see both sides of the argument, especially as it is easy to
make an error when listing an item, it nonetheless is a contract and he
should be bound by it.  If the tables were reversed and you
"accidentally" bid $800.00 instead of $8.00, he sure as heck would hold
you to that, if it were the winning bid.  I know that is a little
extreme in example, but it does illustrate the point.

I've bought and sold a number of times on eBay, and when I screwed up
in my listings, I've honored them as that is the reasoning behind the
purchase, some people just live for the bargain.

On the other hand, it wouldn't hurt to offer to split the shipping.
Chances are the Priority price is inflated anyway, so split it and have
him ship it Parcel Post.  Parcel Post packages often arrive within 5
days as they ship with Priority anyway.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Tom

> I just won an eBay auction for an Aurora kit I've wanted for a
> while. I've dealt with the seller off-eBay since back in the '80s with
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> stuff, usually models, & if I had made that 'mistake', you can bet your
> butts I'd honor "FREE" postage!
frank - 20 Jun 2006 13:28 GMT
   That was my thinking. The eBay 'contract' works both ways. Had I
not been trying to get one of these for some time, I would have told
him to stuff it.

> While I can see both sides of the argument, especially as it is easy to
> make an error when listing an item, it nonetheless is a contract and he
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> > stuff, usually models, & if I had made that 'mistake', you can bet your
> > butts I'd honor "FREE" postage!
John - 21 Jun 2006 02:31 GMT
>again, with no problems. His auction page CLEARLY stated Priority Mail
>was $8 & First Class was FREE. Yes, FREE.

If you check with the post office I think you will find that Priority
Mail and First Class are one in the same - one is for packages, one
for letter post.

However, in response to your real question, I once sold a kit
overseas. The buyer whined that because I did not mark the customs
form as "Gift", he had to pay an exhorbitant amount of duty. I did
refund his duty costs (I think they were $15.00 - I actually lost
money on the deal) and changed my future listings. They now clearly
state that I don't falsify government documents - you are purchasing
(i.e. money is exchanged) merchandise and it will be so stated. It is
not a gift. I then suggest that any duties or fees are their
responsibility and if that is a problem, they should consider not
bidding.

John Alger
IPMS 10906
Charlotte Scale Modelers
Al Superczynski - 21 Jun 2006 02:52 GMT
>If you check with the post office I think you will find that Priority
>Mail and First Class are one in the same...

    No, they're not the same thing:

<http://www.usps.com/businessmail101/classes/firstClass.htm>
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.