Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Water Warning-O/T but important

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
William H. Shuey - 04 Jul 2006 04:56 GMT
Hi Troops:

    If any of you have teenage kids in the family sit them down and have a
little heart to heart talk with them soon, about moving water.
    Many years ago my Great Uncle, who was an old U.S. Navy "Hard Hat"
diver responded to a remark I made about going for a swim in the creek
that ran near his house with an old Navy Man's lecture, the type he used
to give to wet nosed recruits.
    Water weighs about 8 pounds per gallon, moving water has additional
weight or energy because it is moving, they call that Kinetic Energy.
The faster it is moving the more energy or weight it has. 8 inches of
fast moving water can knock you off your feet and as little as 16 inches
can drown you.
    I bring this up because here in the East we have had a series of big
rain storms and in the last week four teen age boys have drowned here in
Maryland because they thought going for a swim in some fast moving
stream looked like fun. Latest one is the son of an acquaintance.  Teen
agers haven't developed the skills to estimate risk, adults need to
enlighten them.

                        Bill Shuey
                    who hates funerals
willshak - 04 Jul 2006 02:47 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>                     who hates funerals
>  

You can't tell teenagers anything. They know it all and believe that
only bad things happen to others. After all, they are invincible.

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To Email, remove the double zeroes after 'at'

Bill Woodier - 04 Jul 2006 16:18 GMT
I suppose most teenagers do they think they know everything.  However that
does not relieve a parent or legal guardian of the responsibility to provide
them with information that may save their lives.

I thought I was invincible when I was in High School as well.  However,
after I went to the funeral of a friend who drowned while swimming in a
local quarry on the 4th of July 1963, I realized that, perhaps there was a
slight chance I didn't know everything and it might possible be capable of
doing something that might cause me or someone else, harm.

Talk with your kids about stuff that can cause them harm.  They will listen,
even when they argue with you or pretend they aren't.  Thank you, Bill S,
for bringing that up.
Signature

Cheers:  Bill Woodier
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.
I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it.
     My Home Page:  http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--

>> Hi Troops:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> You can't tell teenagers anything. They know it all and believe that only
> bad things happen to others. After all, they are invincible.
Rufus - 04 Jul 2006 16:24 GMT
> I suppose most teenagers do they think they know everything.  However that
> does not relieve a parent or legal guardian of the responsibility to provide
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> even when they argue with you or pretend they aren't.  Thank you, Bill S,
> for bringing that up.

I realized I wasn't immortal after attending the funeral of my great
grandfather at kindergarden age.  Guess I never got to be a "genuine"
teenager...

We spend way too much time "protecting" kids and giving false
impressions of carnage in the media, IMO.  Don't just tell them how it
is - show them.  Kids really aren't as stupid as most "it takes a
village" types would like you to believe.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 04 Jul 2006 20:15 GMT
> We spend way too much time "protecting" kids and giving false
> impressions of carnage in the media, IMO.  Don't just tell them how it
> is - show them.  Kids really aren't as stupid as most "it takes a
> village" types would like you to believe.

The smart kids will figure it out on their own, the average kids will
figure it out after seeing it firsthand, the terminally stupid never
will firgure it out and those are the cause of the current "namby-pamby
overprotective BS".
Ron Smith - 04 Jul 2006 20:13 GMT
I realized my mortality in 10th grade when one dumbass took his dad's
car out for a joyride on what was then MD's most dangerous road, he
wrapped it around a 5' diameter tree at about 80mph.

> I suppose most teenagers do they think they know everything.  However that
> does not relieve a parent or legal guardian of the responsibility to provide
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> even when they argue with you or pretend they aren't.  Thank you, Bill S,
> for bringing that up.
Roy Minut - 01 Aug 2006 08:34 GMT
Reminds me of an old Mark Twain Quote:
"When I was a youg man, my Father was the stupidest person around, I hated  
to even be seen with him in publec.  When I reached the age of 21 I was  
amazed in how smart he had gotten!"

> I realized my mortality in 10th grade when one dumbass took his dad's  
> car out for a joyride on what was then MD's most dangerous road, he  
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> listen, even when they argue with you or pretend they aren't.  Thank  
>> you, Bill S, for bringing that up.

Signature

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Ron Smith - 04 Jul 2006 05:24 GMT
  Teen
> agers haven't developed the skills to estimate risk, adults need to
> enlighten them.

That's called Darwinism at work.........
Mad-Modeller - 04 Jul 2006 06:23 GMT
>    Teen
> > agers haven't developed the skills to estimate risk, adults need to
> > enlighten them.
>
> That's called Darwinism at work.........

Yes, and it works on adults too.  We have several railroad underpasses
on the north side of town.  "Everybody" knows not to attempt them when
it rains hard.  Some folks had to be rescued last week from atop their
car anyway.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Ron Smith - 04 Jul 2006 09:48 GMT
> Yes, and it works on adults too.  We have several railroad underpasses
> on the north side of town.  "Everybody" knows not to attempt them when
> it rains hard.  Some folks had to be rescued last week from atop their
> car anyway.

Oh we have lots of those dumbasses too......personally I say let them
drown if they're over 18 and that damned stupid. Emergency services have
enough to deal with when it floods like that, rescuing the terminally
stupid just encourages them.
e - 04 Jul 2006 16:35 GMT
>>    Teen
>> > agers haven't developed the skills to estimate risk, adults need to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

that happens around mojave a lot too. mostly dumbass
tourists but sometimes even the locals do it.
Ray S. & Nayda Katzaman - 04 Jul 2006 15:32 GMT
The way I see it, that is Nature getting rid of the inept and burdens to society.
If they were to survive, they would more than likely be a vegetable and we would
have to pay $30,000 a month for life sustaining equipment and lawyer's fees.

Just my 2¢

Ray
Austin, TX
===
Bill Woodier - 04 Jul 2006 16:32 GMT
What causes a person to assume a medical vegetative state (as opposed to a couch potato vegetative state) is an injury suffered to the brain as a result of illness, deprivation of oxygen or injury, etc.  

The mere act of driving a car into a flooded area, then sitting atop the stalled and flooded car, while a sign of stupidity, does not, in itself, turn one onto a vegetable.  Why would being rescued from such situation cause someone to be come a vegetable and require $30,000 a month to sustain life, etc?
Signature

Cheers:  Bill Woodier
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.  
I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it.
     My Home Page:  http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--

 The way I see it, that is Nature getting rid of the inept and burdens to society.  If they were to survive, they would more than likely be a vegetable and we would have to pay $30,000 a month for life sustaining equipment and lawyer's fees.
 Just my 2¢

 Ray
 Austin, TX
 ===
   
   
Ron Smith - 04 Jul 2006 20:17 GMT
> The mere act of driving a car into a flooded area, then sitting atop the
> stalled and flooded car, while a sign of stupidity, does not, in itself,
> turn one onto a vegetable.  Why would being rescued from such situation
> cause someone to be come a vegetable and require $30,000 a month to
> sustain life, etc?

The rescuing of the terminally stupid just reminds the rest of them that
they too can not think for themselves and be bailed out.
teem - 05 Jul 2006 00:34 GMT
>> The mere act of driving a car into a flooded area, then sitting atop the
>> stalled and flooded car, while a sign of stupidity, does not, in itself,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>The rescuing of the terminally stupid just reminds the rest of them that
>they too can not think for themselves and be bailed out.
A fireman/rescue man lost his life AFTER saving 4 overgrown snot
nosers,her in n.e.ohio.last week the heavy rains,before they went to
the n.y./maryland area.
Gray Ghost - 05 Jul 2006 06:39 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>                               Bill Shuey
>                          who hates funerals

We (wife and I) just kayaked the New River few weeks back. I rolled it
twice. Once in very shallow water and it was a bitch trying to recover and
stand up in water not even up to my knees.

Frank
Vess Irvine - 12 Jul 2006 18:41 GMT
Hi Bill:

Good point.

And yet, all the responses to this message seem to be either .....

1) People (teenagers) are dumb and deserve to die for being terminally
stupidity
2) It is the fault of "it takes a village" type people (Huh?)

Comment 2) has to be just about the most meaningless finger pecking ever
seen in rec.models.scale.

What is remarkable to me is the lack of comments about the possible root
cause of all this flooding ...... namely, global warming. OK, so one flood
does not prove, nor disprove, the legitimacy of the global warming threat.
But one cannot ignore that we have had wacky weather for at least half a
decade now; and every year it becomes hotter and the storms more severe.

The consensus of just about EVERY scientist of note is that global warming
is indeed a likely threat to us all. I have two eyes and can see the
glaciers above Estes Park are shrinking, and that Colorado has suffered some
really serious forest fire seasons of late. And the bark beetles are
chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees (just take a drive
through Grand Lake, Colorado, one of these days).

Christ, it almost reached 100 degrees in Estes Park in June (about 98) and
that has NEVER happened in my experience here at 8,000 feet in the Rockies.

And yet, our way too vocal wingnut modelers can only add the most shallow of
commentary to your OT observation. Not a single one of them can
"connect-the-dots" of kids being swept from the rooftops of cars and cars
spewing out carbon dioxide in massive quantities for just about the entire
span of my life.

Although "connect-the-dots" is one of W.'s favorite phrases, if ever there
was a President incapable of doing just that to the degree of this moron, I
don't remember.

Please, go see Al Gore's movie.

...../Vess

> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>      Bill Shuey
> who hates funerals
e - 12 Jul 2006 19:31 GMT
>Hi Bill:
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
>....../Vess

and now scientists have measured light sources to find dust
and pollution have cut visible light by 20% over much of the
globe. so if there was global warming, we would have a much
colder climate.
one climitoligist took the rare oppurtunity of the days
after 9/11 when aircraft were grounded to measure how much
lisght controls blocked.....a very large chunk of the 20%.
so we clean up the air and roast, or clean up the heat and
freeze.
we are so f.cking clever we need to be protected from it.
WmB - 12 Jul 2006 22:33 GMT
>>And the bark beetles are
>>chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees

Take it up with God.

>>Please, go see Al Gore's movie.
>>
>>....../Vess

Ambien works a lot better.

> so we clean up the air and roast, or clean up the heat and
> freeze.
> we are so f.cking clever we need to be protected from it.

Amen to that.

Maybe the pagans were right all along and maybe we should give human
sacrfice a second chance - I nominate V*ss.

WmB
e - 13 Jul 2006 00:02 GMT
>>>And the bark beetles are
>>>chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>WmB

hate to tell you, but vess has some valid points. well, they
aren't his, but they are being proven more and more. we
would actually be about 2c warmer without air pollution.
one of the nova scientists said a small nuclear warm may
stop the heat. he said it tongue in cheek, but the modeling
proved him out....
WmB - 13 Jul 2006 07:25 GMT
>>>>And the bark beetles are
>>>>chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
> hate to tell you, but vess has some valid points.

FWIS, the only point V*ss has is the one at the top of his head.

WmB
e - 13 Jul 2006 14:28 GMT
>>>>>And the bark beetles are
>>>>>chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>WmB

mostly. but even he isn't wrong all the time.
Gernot Hassenpflug - 14 Jul 2006 02:12 GMT
>>>>And the bark beetles are
>>>>chomping through all our forests, killing swaths of trees
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> stop the heat. he said it tongue in cheek, but the modeling
> proved him out....

Bwahahaha - the modeling bore him out. Yeah right. The modeling
community laughs with you. Seriously - models are vital in helping to
explore areas of theory to obtain data that cannot (yet) be obtained
by experiment (would take too long, are inaccessible, or would be too
dangerous to obtain). But models cannot prove anything, they can only
give data which has to be interpreted. If they show stuff that reality
(or another model) determines differently, changes are made. We cannot
model accurately, only with many many assumptions and
simplifications. Hell, even supercomputers cannot model the interior
of the Earth in 3-D, or take into account all spatial and time scales
for coupled atmospheric and oceanic modeling (which again are still
separate from interior Earth models).
Signature

Gernot Hassenpflug (gernot@rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp)      Tel: +81 774 38-3866
JSPS Fellow (Rm.403, RISH, Kyoto Uni.)              Fax: +81 774 31-8463
www.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/radar-group/members/gernot   Mob: +81 90 39493924

e - 14 Jul 2006 02:32 GMT
>> In article <1Vdtg.6814$ye3.5569@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, " WmB"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>for coupled atmospheric and oceanic modeling (which again are still
>separate from interior Earth models).
you're the only one that got it, gertie.
true, but we can at least get half a wrong idea about what
we think we don't know.
Gernot Hassenpflug - 15 Jul 2006 07:28 GMT
>>> hate to tell you, but vess has some valid points. well, they
>>> aren't his, but they are being proven more and more. we
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>for coupled atmospheric and oceanic modeling (which again are still
>>separate from interior Earth models).

> you're the only one that got it, gertie.
> true, but we can at least get half a wrong idea about what
> we think we don't know.

LOL Too true. In scientific research the world over, I theorize that
there is a huge impact made by two important and related phenomena:
lack of time, and the so-called "hand of god". The former means that
nobody has the time to really check another person's work thoroughly,
indepdendent research is tough to get these days. The latter shows up
when time limits make good scientific analysis impossible, and the
interpid sorcerer fudges a few things here and there :-) Happens with
students in the Master thesis a lot, but with the "publish or perish"
policy these days, almost anything goes! The bottom line is:
"Everybody loves a good picture but not everybody is prepared to argue
the definition of good".
Signature

Gernot Hassenpflug (gernot@rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp)      Tel: +81 774 38-3866
JSPS Fellow (Rm.403, RISH, Kyoto Uni.)              Fax: +81 774 31-8463
www.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/radar-group/members/gernot   Mob: +81 90 39493924

e - 15 Jul 2006 15:10 GMT
>> In article <87y7uxugs1.fsf@mb3.seikyou.ne.jp>, Gernot Hassenpflug
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>"Everybody loves a good picture but not everybody is prepared to argue
>the definition of good".

and in a world where the concept of good enough is
acceptable, fudge can come from shitty sources.
Ron Smith - 13 Jul 2006 00:22 GMT
> Maybe the pagans were right all along and maybe we should give human
> sacrfice a second chance - I nominate V*ss.

Possible confilct..........human is the operative word and Vess is a virus.
Ron Smith - 13 Jul 2006 00:21 GMT
> and now scientists have measured light sources to find dust
> and pollution have cut visible light by 20% over much of the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> freeze.
> we are so f.cking clever we need to be protected from it.

Why are you responding to a troll that promised to never post on rms
again if his nemesis GWB won the 2004 election? Vess is like herpes, an
infection that only goes into remission but never fully leaves.
e - 13 Jul 2006 03:42 GMT
>> In article <Fvatg.134$Cu3.58@fe07.lga>, "Vess Irvine"
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>again if his nemesis GWB won the 2004 election? Vess is like herpes, an
>infection that only goes into remission but never fully leaves.

because i have this ridiculous belief in the first amendment
and a dislike of control freaks.
i don't remember volunteering to fight your battles.
Gernot Hassenpflug - 14 Jul 2006 02:06 GMT
> and now scientists have measured light sources to find dust
> and pollution have cut visible light by 20% over much of the
> globe. so if there was global warming, we would have a much
> colder climate.

You need to understand the effects of such things in different parts
of the atmosphere. Global warming in the lower atmosphere is
accompnaied by global cooling at higher altitudes, due to interactions
between chemical processes, physical processes and dynamics.

> one climitoligist took the rare oppurtunity of the days
> after 9/11 when aircraft were grounded to measure how much
> lisght controls blocked.....a very large chunk of the 20%.
> so we clean up the air and roast, or clean up the heat and
> freeze.

See above. What is clear is that the mechanisms that control the
distribution of energy from the equator to the poles need to be
maintained, else we will freeze in one part and fry in another. The
problem is that the Earth system can only handle extremes up to a
certain (unknown) extent in either direction - since it is the same
system overall. So if it gets too hot or too cold in any area, the
system has a possibility of becoming unstalbe (either all the
atmosphere escapes into space, or condenses thicker and thicker, or
chemical composition changes may occur which make human life as we
know it impossible).

> we are so f.cking clever we need to be protected from it.

"Ignorance frequently engenders more confidence than does knowledge".
Said by (from memory)? ... Charles Darwin.

Signature

Gernot Hassenpflug (gernot@rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp)      Tel: +81 774 38-3866
JSPS Fellow (Rm.403, RISH, Kyoto Uni.)              Fax: +81 774 31-8463
www.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/radar-group/members/gernot   Mob: +81 90 39493924

e - 14 Jul 2006 02:30 GMT
>> and now scientists have measured light sources to find dust
>> and pollution have cut visible light by 20% over much of the
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>"Ignorance frequently engenders more confidence than does knowledge".
>Said by (from memory)? ... Charles Darwin.

sounds like chuckie...
i know what you're saying. look at the atlantic conveyor.
it's weakening and slowing. so we could get an ice age
because of global warming. sounds contrarian, but that seems
to be the way it works.
Mad-Modeller - 14 Jul 2006 03:09 GMT
> >"Ignorance frequently engenders more confidence than does knowledge".
> >Said by (from memory)? ... Charles Darwin.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> because of global warming. sounds contrarian, but that seems
> to be the way it works.

It would most immediately affect NW Europe as the cold water sloshing
down from the Pole would cut off the warm Gulf Stream waters.  Of
course, any effects there would push changes elsewhere, as noted.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 14 Jul 2006 05:26 GMT
>> In article <873bd5vvmz.fsf@mb3.seikyou.ne.jp>, Gernot Hassenpflug
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

that seems to be happening. even england is roasting this
year.
Ed Pirrero - 12 Jul 2006 19:34 GMT
> Hi Bill:
>
> Good point.

You shoulda stopped there.

The rest of your crap belongs in a political newsgroup -  alt.politics,
or some such.

So does the other political blather in this newsgroup, but that's a
different story.  The wacko fringes don't stand a chance in a dedicated
newsgroup, so they spout their OT junk in a newsgroup where the nodding
heads will just pretend it doesn't smell.

Want to know why r.m.s. has half the traffic it used to?  The political
crap spewed by the know-littles.

E.P.
Kurt Laughlin - 13 Jul 2006 03:05 GMT
> Want to know why r.m.s. has half the traffic it used to?  The political
> crap spewed by the know-littles.

I do know why, but it's two reasons, really:

1. Many ISPs no longer carry USENET groups like r.m.s.  You can still access
them after a fashion, #2 below explains why people don't.

2. Because of the www there are many more specialized modeling sites.  These
are much more appealing than general sites like this to most modelers.

Although it is much more exciting to blame politics or off-topic posts for
the decline in postings, the reality is much more mundane.

KL
Ed Pirrero - 13 Jul 2006 06:21 GMT
> > Want to know why r.m.s. has half the traffic it used to?  The political
> > crap spewed by the know-littles.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 1. Many ISPs no longer carry USENET groups like r.m.s.  You can still access
> them after a fashion, #2 below explains why people don't.

You can get at just about anything, for free, with Google.

> 2. Because of the www there are many more specialized modeling sites.  These
> are much more appealing than general sites like this to most modelers.

Yes, but you are looking at the result, and not the cause.

> Although it is much more exciting to blame politics or off-topic posts for
> the decline in postings, the reality is much more mundane.

Look at the traffic before the run-up to the last two elections, and
then the traffic after.  In both cases, a large drop-off of postings.
Some folks came back, but not all.

The reason those internet sites do well is because they don't suffer
from the blowhards who feel the need to vent spleen in usenet, but
don't have the courage to do it in front of the appropriate crowd.

And it's really too bad - I learned a ton from r.m.s., and laughed at
my own misfortunes mirrored in other hobbyists' reports of woes, but
this group just hasn't been the same after the y2k elections.  And it
went even further downhill after 2k4.  I suspect 2k6 and 2k8 will do it
in entirely.

E.P.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.