 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Models / August 2006Kit costs
Hi Troops: I hit my local purveyor of plastic today and got a surprise. The new 1/32 scale Tamiya A6M2 was there, $100. But Boy! What a kit! This appears to raise the bar on kit design and molding quality. This will be a marvelous model if the fit is up to Tamiya's usual standard. However, this is also a good example of the subject of kit costs getting steadily higher and less and less kids coming into the hobby. We have kicked that subject around many times on here. I suspect someone was listening. Also on the shelves were a couple of Eduard kits in a new format called "Weekend Kits". The price was $10 (actually less with the shops discount). A nifty little rendition of Eduard's Nieuport 17 caught my eye. Also what looked like a version of the YAK 3 and another kit I didn't look at close as I was drooling over the Zero. If Eduard is looking at the high end modeller and collector with their "Blue Max" Fokker D.7, it appears they are also testing the waters at the low $$ end of the hobby too. I wish them good luck! This will bear watching to see if it sells, and if other companies follow suite. Someone in Eduard's marketing department is very active and not afraid to try something new. Bill Shuey >Hi Troops: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Bill Shuey that's why i like the matchbox and lindbeg's. kids can afford them, you can make a decent looking airplane and you can even bash them for practice. i would cite my making every possible variant of the do 335. you can argue the engines weren't perfect and the fuselage a little wide for the trolley versions, but i got scratching skills out of the at less than 4 bucks each. i like the super-dooper tamiya kits, too. i just can't build as many of them. >>suite. Someone in Eduard's marketing department is very active and not >>afraid to try something new. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > i like the super-dooper tamiya kits, too. i just can't build > as many of them. Thats good to hear, with those fairly high quality pre-made Ultimate Soldier (and others) around for $10-$20 model companies are going to have a hard time competing. I would think the fairly successful Flight Sim combat computer game market would be stimulating models more, it's wht got me back into it... BD >>>suite. Someone in Eduard's marketing department is very active and not >>>afraid to try something new. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >BD that's a natural tie in form model companies, i wonder why they haven't approached the game producers. and the new thing from Eduard are the 'weekend edition' kits... same kits that were sold a few years ago in the $28 range are getting blown out at $11 retail.... Albatros D.III in 1/48 and Yak3 in 1/48.... then their double kits.... very interesting. But regarding the 'weekend edition' kits, they are fairy basic... one set of decals, no extra goochies (PE, resin, etc... nothing) so you can just build them up and detail them how ever you want. Kit decals are good, but only one choice... like we don't have enough decals to spare anyhow. Well, Eduard is dropping their prices, which is a good sign. --- Stephen Stephen About 2 years ago I wondered aloud on the WW1 modelling list just where Eduard was taking their product, and suggested that they should *not* go the super-profipack expensive route unless they also kept a cheap alternative. Otherwise they'd lose a great swathe of customers who don't care for resin and etch and kit decals > But regarding the 'weekend edition' kits, they are fairy basic... one > set of decals, no extra goochies (PE, resin, etc... nothing) so you can > just build them up and detail them how ever you want. Kit decals are > good, but only one choice... like we don't have enough decals to spare > anyhow. Better still, match a couple of weekend kits to one of the specials and make sevarl of the possible markings variations. I'm thinking here of the Hanriot special markings edition, which had three really tasty options BUT - to build all three one needed to buy three expensive kits. This way, you need just one (and some weekend kits) Shane (who builds so slowly that a weekend kit is actually a seasonal kit - possible to build in a hasty 12 weeks) > Stephen > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Shane (who builds so slowly that a weekend kit is actually a seasonal kit - > possible to build in a hasty 12 weeks) Speed demon! Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. >>I would think the fairly successful Flight Sim combat computer game market >>would be stimulating models more, it's wht got me back into it... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >that's a natural tie in form model companies, i wonder why >they haven't approached the game producers. I've thought of that before, and I wish I could think of a good way to do a tie-in of some kind. That "IL-2 Sturmovik" combat flightsim was a very popular game, and we actually make kits for both the IL-2 and IL-2m3, so I'd be very happy to sell some of those to some gamers if I had a good way to reach the ones that might actually be interested. I guess one reason I have put it off is that those two are both pretty much bare-bones kits, and I've thought I'd wait until we upgrade them with some nice detail parts and decals before putting a lot of effort into pushing them. But if you have any ideas on that, I'm all ears! Chuck -- Don's Model Works www.donsmodelworks.com See our online catalog with photos and info on: - all Wings Models kits (including Eagles Talon kits) - all Wings Models decals (now available individually) - over 250+ rare and hard-to-find model kits, including foreign and out-of-production kits. Hot August Sale! 20% Off Selected Kits This Month Only! >>>I would think the fairly successful Flight Sim combat computer game >>>market would be stimulating models more, it's wht got me back into [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Hot August Sale! > 20% Off Selected Kits This Month Only! How about gamers magazines? I know it can be pricey but you might look into anuway. Frank "Chuck" <web2@nospam.donsmodelworks.com> kirjoitti viestissä:o5htc25oqlj0b9jjmc3cl6fhruh9ddqsvu@4ax.com... > I've thought of that before, and I wish I could think of a good way to > do a tie-in of some kind. That "IL-2 Sturmovik" combat flightsim was a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Chuck http://www.simhq.com/ is a hangout popular with many flightsimmers, Il-2 and others. >The new 1/32 scale Tamiya A6M2 was there, $100. [...] >...this is also a good example of the subject of kit costs >getting steadily higher and less and less kids coming into the hobby. I don't buy this explanation. If cost were the reason they wouldn't be buying video games and other expensive stuff either. Today's kids may not be into model-building like we were at their age but it's not because of price - there are still plenty of 'pocket money' kits on the market.  SignatureAl Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968 My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email. Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place": http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to, and the critics will flame you every time." >>The new 1/32 scale Tamiya A6M2 was there, $100. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > age but it's not because of price - there are still plenty of 'pocket > money' kits on the market. I think I ahve to agree with that. If you stuck to 1/72 aircraft certainly between say Revell and Academy there are a lot of fairly nice and modern tooling aircraft out there at under $10 a pop. You could build your own LuftFlotte for that kind of money. Frank > Hi Troops: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > (actually less with the shops discount). A nifty little rendition of > Eduard's Nieuport 17 caught my eye. snip > Bill Shuey I did a study awhile ago on kit prices and inflation. What I found is that there is a wider RANGE of prices, but still ones available that are in line with inflation. What has happened is that there are kits now that are truly deluxe, with LOTS of parts, very fine detail, etc. THOSE are above the price of the average kit in days gone by, but then there were no comparable kits in the old days to compare them to. I remember my early plastic kits. No cockpit detail- maybe a pilot figure to fill up the space. No engine, or on radials a representation of the front of the engine only. The same kits I started with, the Hawk kits, now sold by Testors, are very much in line with inflation since the fifties, when I started building plastic models. I see kids spending LOTS of money these days. They have lots of cash, but they spend it on video game cartridges and the like. It is not so much MODELS that they are not interested in, it is planes and even cars that they do not find as fascinating as we did as kids. But I am not worried about the health of the hobby, because some of the genre (model railroading, sailing ships) were ALWAYS adult genre, and these are still healthy. [stuff snipped] > The same kits I started with, the Hawk kits, now sold by Testors, are > very much in line with inflation since the fifties, when I started [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > railroading, sailing ships) were ALWAYS adult genre, and these are > still healthy. I think that one factor that affects kit sales to the young is that despite the current war the military is not as evident on TV shows (except for the news) as they were during the early Vietnam era. I can remember when 12 O'Clock High, Combat, Rat Patrol, and even Hogan's Heroes were on primetime, all WW2-related shows. Across all entertainment there is less focus on military things. The luster of all things military (also a result of WW2) wore off during the Vietnam War and subsequent low visibility means no commercial tie-ins. The market follows the population. And don't blame it on the TV networks - the public is not much interested in the military. For a 15-year old, even Vietnam is ancient history, and WW2 is almost pre-historic. As for the kids, anything that moves is more interesting than a static kit. A video game or a sim inherently has more interest. You get immediate feedback and it engages brain and body. Today there are many more avenues of entertainment for children, and many more competing interests. My two kids have little or no interest in models that don't tie in to their interests, which are dominated by Star Wars films, Japanese-influenced cartoons/comics, game cards, and video games. They would much rather play a video game then spend hours gluing something together. The times have changed. The demographic I see at model shows are mostly middle-aged men with money to spend, a large proportion of them military veterans who are also largely the children of military veterans. With the baby-boomer generation advancing in age and the proportion of younger people getting smaller, I bet we will see a continuing drop of interest in modeling amongst the younger set, and rise in interest modeling in the geriatric set. John Hairell (tpn18@yahoo.com) > As for the kids, anything that moves is more interesting than a static > kit. A video game or a sim inherently has more interest. You get [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > modeling amongst the younger set, and rise in interest modeling in the > geriatric set. and note that there is the die cast and 1/18 scale aircraft business that is really taking off. You can get any car you want in a fairly large scale in die cast. and I have a garage ceiling full of 1/18 aircraft....and now I don't have to buy models of those planes. What we used to build now can be bought ready made, out the door, ready for display. Craig <crw59@earthlink.net> kirjoitti viestissä:1153934738.833409.88740@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... > and note that there is the die cast and 1/18 scale aircraft business > that is really taking off. You can get any car you want in a fairly [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Craig If something like this http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/misc/21c/kit_21c_mc202.shtml would have been available for whatever 15 dollars was worth back then how many of us, as novices, would have bothered to build and paint, ending up (initially at least) with far worse representation of the subject? Wonder if this is the future for mass market and do-it-yourself kits will be evermore pricey to compensate for dwindling customer base. "JASG" <NJETSPAMSKIjagripen@mbnet.fi> > If something like this > http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/misc/21c/kit_21c_mc202.shtml would have > been available for whatever 15 dollars was worth back then how many of us, > as novices, would have bothered to build and paint, ending up (initially > at least) with far worse representation of the subject? Good point > Wonder if this is the future for mass market and do-it-yourself kits will > be evermore pricey to compensate for dwindling customer base. I think it might be kind of synergistic ... i bought the C.202 you see reviewed above and it has me itching to build the 4 or 5 kits i have which have been sitting in a box on in the closet for over a year... and I even bought a rather expensive Trumpeter P-40 online. For me the premade aircraft can provide both the "herd" of my fleet and a nice benchmark on quality to strive to surpass for my more cherished personally made "thoroughbreds". I just need to figure out a place to put a whole bunch of models on display now. BD > If something like this > http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/misc/21c/kit_21c_mc202.shtml would have [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Wonder if this is the future for mass market and do-it-yourself kits will be > evermore pricey to compensate for dwindling customer base. Actually, they were to a degree. Back when I started modeling, I cut my teeth on the old AMT 3-in-1 kits. There were a few kids that went down to the local car dealers and bought the pre-made models of the various Chevies, Fords, Pontiacs and Studebakers. Many of these flywheel "models" were of body styles that the 3-in-1s didn't offer, station wagons, pick-up trucks and Studebakers. Some brought them home and kitbashed with a similar, existing AMT kit, but a lot of them went on the shelf. A friend of mine converted a '56 Studebaker into a really nice rendition of a dirt-track racer. Came out looking great. The original was driven by his father on weekends. <crw59@earthlink.net> wrote in message > What we used to build now can be bought ready made, out the door, ready > for display. > > Craig Thats what i was saying .. BD > <crw59@earthlink.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > BD And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I know a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. Buying something ready-made seems like cheating, or shallow. Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I know > a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. Buying > something ready-made seems like cheating, or shallow. > > Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. I bought the large scale airplanes primarily on the fact that I have no time anymore. I bought a 90 year old house 2 years ago and every weekend since then has been taken over by this money pit. Building is just a distant fantasy right now.... Craig >> And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I know >> a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. Buying [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Craig that is such a great book and lousy movie. > > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I know > > a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. Buying [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Craig My sympathies. I know all too well the 'fun' of repairing a Victorian barn. Everything costs too much, nothing was built to standard sizes, everything needs replaced, updated, etc. We spent $2,000 right off just to get the toilet to flush. Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. >> > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I >> > know a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked exaclty like a house should look but they are bordering on a 100 years old. Still my wife is swooning over mulitple fireplaces on each floor and the big wraparound porchs. The square footage is impressive, too. Frank > Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area > and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Frank Ghosty: The cost of upkeep will impress you also. A friend of mine bought a house in Gettysburg when he retired, he's a civil war buff and it was his dream home. House was built in 1876, not long after the battle, it actually was included in the cyclorama painting because the artist didn't realise it was "new". You want his e-mail addy, you can commiserate in the years to come! :-) Bill Shuey who wants to get out of the Baltimore area. > >> > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I > >> > know a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Frank Yep, that square footage can be impressive. Our prize cost between $600-800 to heat each winter in the '70s. I pale at the thought of what it runs now although the succeeding owners made improvements that we could not afford. Ours was just a Victorian row house complete with a mansard roof on Orange St. in Lancaster City. They like to promote city living around here but my experience of 20 years living in the city was similar to a dairy cow's on the farm. They lead you in, hook up the tubes and proceed to milk you of cash. The idea that you actually own something is a hoot. There are so many restrictions on what you can do and how you can do it that you get the impression that only the outlaws enjoy life in there. Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. >> >> > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I >> >> > know a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > >Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. yep, there's a real veteran speaking. >>> > And somehow I feel revolted by the first fact. I never feel like I >>> > know a subject if I haven't put it together with my 10 thumbs. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > >Frank be really carefull and get an appraiser with knowledge. or even higher a specialist . vics are hot and the sleaze out there will eat the unwary alive. a few thou on the eval can save your savings and sanity. > Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area > and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Frank I'm in Albany, CA. Right across from SF. Prices are high but then we pay for the location. We can walk to everything, the weather, except for last week, is perfect.... All we need now are two professional football teams and then we would really have something. Craig > > Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area > > and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Craig And just how much do you think your taxes will have to go up to build stadiums for those teams?? Bill Shuey Living in Baltimore where they just had to have separate stadiums for both the football AND baseball teams. > Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area > and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked > exaclty like a house should look but they are bordering on a 100 years old. > Still my wife is swooning over mulitple fireplaces on each floor and the big > wraparound porchs. The square footage is impressive, too. Frank - Having owned an antique home for a while (before moving into a "newer" 50-year-old home), I have to tell you this. Those "mulitple fireplaces on each floor" were there for a reason; those older barns tend to have a ~lot~ of cold spots in them during the winter because the house outdates the heating system. On the other hand, they do tend to have some room in them, probably for the Victorian-sized families..... >> Where do you folks live. We are contemplating moing away from the DC area >> and we saw some very nice Victorians in Louisville. I thought they looked [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >On the other hand, they do tend to have some room in them, probably for >the Victorian-sized families..... i really learned to love the triple deckers. they were built as three seperat one floor apartments but some people make one big house and some make 6 apartments. they have front and rear porches, flat roofs and were also drafty. but modern windows and insulation can make them snug. i had a floor in my last boston house. 3 bedrooms, one full bath and a wc, big kitchen/dining room and a great living room with bay windows. i was there for 10 years having moved in after a major remodel and i heated the whole place with one gas burner in the living room. cheaply. there was a heater built in the kitchen stove but i only needed that when it was below 10f. i loved that place. if it was here at the rent i payed then..... [snipped] > The demographic I see at model shows are mostly middle-aged men with > money to spend, a large proportion of them military veterans who are > also largely the children of military veterans. I think that is the crux of the matter? People of my age (52) had fathers in the military whether by choice or by government decree. Our friends had fathers in the military (often a completely different branch) so it was a point of common interest. We grew up with tales of what they had done and wanted to know as much about the subject as possible which often included building models. My dad was no great model builder himself but he encuraged my efforts as much as possible. (kim) I said it before and I'll say it aging, the younger generation is used to instant gratification with everything they do. Building a decent model takes some time, effort, and skill. Their average attention span is about 10 minutes. That does not translate well into modeling. Buying something already built and shelving it does not turn my crank but it obviously works for someone. Traditional modeling, as we know it, will continue to shrink as us old fartz die off....... (:> >I said it before and I'll say it aging, the younger generation is used >to instant gratification with everything they do. Building a decent >model takes some time, effort, and skill. Their average attention span >is about 10 minutes. That does not translate well into modeling. I have to disagree with this part. My kids (ages 9 to 14) do lots of activities that require time, effort, skill, and attention to detail. They are just different activities from model building. My two sons, age 10 and 12, spend hours on pencil drawings and computer artwork. They also build intricate Lego models, both the "pre-designed" modern kind and the "freehand" kind from just basic blocks. One close analog to model building that we did not even have as an option is computer modeling. They like to build added features to use in various computer games, using computer art programs and 3-D modeling programs. They can spend just as much time and attention on these as someone might on building a model kit; the main difference is that they don't have a tangible result to set on the shelf for display, instead it is only visible in the game or other appropriate viewing application on the computer. >Buying something already built and shelving it does not turn my crank >but it obviously works for someone. Traditional modeling, as we know >it, will continue to shrink as us old fartz die off....... (:> I don't have as much disagreement with this part, although as someone who makes and sells model kits I certainly hope it is a long, slow process. Chuck -- Don's Model Works www.donsmodelworks.com See our online catalog with photos and info on: - all Wings Models kits (including Eagles Talon kits) - all Wings Models decals (now available individually) - over 250+ rare and hard-to-find model kits, including foreign and out-of-production kits. Hot August Sale! 20% Off Selected Kits This Month Only! Since this subject has been bandied about before, and I didn't issue forth with my 1/50 of a dollar's worth, I'll give it a shot. I agree wholeheartedly with the notion that kids today don't look at the military like we did, and therefore military modeling, at least for them, is of little interest. I had uncles and grandfathers from both sides on both sides during WWII (which made for some real tension when my father married my mother, believe me!). My father, sister, her husband and myself are all ex-Navy, so the whole military mindset is burned into our DNA. I also grew up with 12 O'Clock High, Rat Patrol, Combat, etc, etc. So, three guesses what I model. Those shows portrayed Americans as courageous heroes fighting an enemy that was trying to take over the world. We were thrilled at their exploits, and built models of their fighting machines. The mindset during Vietnam, and the years after, was that Americans are kiddie killers, and shouldn't be acknowledged in any positive light. By virtue of that, neither should the equipment they used. I didn't build modern military kits during the Vietnam war, I built WWI and II kits, and muscle cars (it was the 60's after all). We boomers still build military stuff because it's a real part of us and our childhoods. On this forum we are predominantly military modelers. I'm not so sure we're not having a myopic moment and only seeing the military modeling dwindling. To me, there seems to be quite a bit of interest in sci-fi, and resin figures. Maybe we need AM, Tamiya, Trumpeter, Dragon and the like to start popping out these items. They're obviously going to need to do something as we boomers start taking the dirt nap in greater numbers. >I'm not so sure we're not having a >myopic moment and only seeing the military modeling dwindling. To me, >there seems to be quite a bit of interest in sci-fi, and resin figures. And cars. Don't forget cars - far and away the most popular plastic modeling genre here in the US. SignatureAl Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968 My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email. Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place": http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to, and the critics will flame you every time." "Disco58" <timetraveler658@yahooyahoo.com> wrote in message > The mindset during Vietnam, and the years after, was that Americans are > kiddie killers, and shouldn't be acknowledged in any positive light. By > virtue of that, neither should the equipment they used. I didn't build Interesting thread. I'm a military veteran and so was my dad, but neither of were really military types. Doing a tour was a kind of right of passage for both of us, him in the Navy, me in the Army. But were both way to independent minded to really fit into military regimen or make a career out of it. He got me into modeling though, no denying it. I make models of all eras but prefer the World War II planes and tanks, particularly fighters. For the Vietnam stuff, the reason I never made a lot of that stuff wasn't that I looked at the US army as baby killers. As I said I'd been in the military myself know enough about military history to have a better sense that the World War II era guys weren't all saints and the Vietnam guys weren't all bad guys by any means. I think the reason the Vietnam era stuff wasn't as popular is that it just wasn't as cool. The battles weren't as cool and the vehicles weren't as cool. Lets face it some M48 tanks shooting into the jungle trying to protect a firebase, getting popped by B-10 rockets and RPG's, just isn't as dramatic as Kursk or Bastogne or El Alamein. Asymmetrical warfare is about attrition, not high drama (unless you are in the middle of it). Every time I think about 60's era US tanks fighting in terrain like that I can't help but think of the hopelessness of a million dollar iron beast being knocked out by a $500 rocket. Over and over and over again. Its kind of symbolic of the waste, the inefficiency of vietnam. It is not glamorous. And in Vietnam we really din't have a fast paced multifaceted arms race going on, the equipment only kind of gradually improved and a lot of the really crappy stuff stuck around way longer than it should. I mean, a Thunderchief is just not a sexy aircraft compared to say, a Spitfire, or even a P-47 Thunderbolt. Yeah there were air battles but these were rare, and few and far between. Again, a Sam-2 shooting down a Skyhawk is damn exciting for the Skyhawk pilot and for the Sam crew too, but doesn't compare to the Battle of Britain. In World II you had 5 nations each cranking out their own unique military hardware in hundreds of varitieties, you went from biplanes to jets in 5 years. Vietnam just wasn't "cool" in that way. There were some dogfights with MiG 17, 19, 21... but what did the top US Ace in Vietnam score, 5 or 6 kills? Meh. On the other hand, I'm not too into modern stuff either because, at least in the wars we've been fighting against Iraq, we outclass the enemy so badly it's no contest. What chance does a T-64 have against an M-1? Thats like a Stuart against a Panther. In the desert no less. Maybe the Iranians will give us a bit more trouble and we'll have some more model-worthy battles to get excited about. Or maybe we'll really go nuts and invade Europe, we'll see how the M-1 holds up against a Leopard 2, Leclerc, etc. BD With the large expense of new kits, I have started buying old Aurora and other brands from the 50's to build straight out of the box with the original decals and inaccurate color schemes. They make a distinctfully charming and historical display. And even at collector prices, these kits are still cheaper than many of the new kits of today. > With the large expense of new kits, I have started buying old Aurora and > other brands from the 50's to build straight out of the box with the > original decals and inaccurate color schemes. They make a distinctfully > charming and historical display. And even at collector prices, these kits > are still cheaper than many of the new kits of today. You can get a lot of old kits on Ebay for considerably less than at most hobby shops, for example I got most of the old Revell 1/32 ww II fighter kits for around $10-$20, plus plenty of matchbox, hasegawa, airfix and others in the same price range if you check often enough... BD > > With the large expense of new kits, I have started buying old Aurora and > > other brands from the 50's to build straight out of the box with the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > BD Don't I know it. Getting a taste of this collecting thing, I discovered early on that the big money went to the cleanest, most mint kit available. Built-ups were for those who couldn't afford buying a kit. E-bay has turned all that on its head. Built-ups are bringing in the bucks and kits are a hard sell, no matter the age or rarity. I guess it's another symptom of this 'instant gratification' thing. Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. >> > With the large expense of new kits, I have started buying old Aurora and >> > other brands from the 50's to build straight out of the box with the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > >Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. how do your builds sell, bill? just curious becuse i'm out of space and bored with stuff. if i could get the kit price back.... > With the large expense of new kits, I have started buying old Aurora and > other brands from the 50's to build straight out of the box with the > original decals and inaccurate color schemes. They make a distinctfully > charming and historical display. And even at collector prices, these kits > are still cheaper than many of the new kits of today. You can still get the old kits even at hobby shops. The Testors/Hawk 1/48 scale stuff has been reissued several times, and is still available at less than ten bucks a kit. Those are the very kits I started plastic modeling with, and they are exactly in line with inflation. Of course, they are not super detailed, but hey, they weren't back in the old days either :-) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.