Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My first time - etched brass

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Maciek - 04 Aug 2006 07:10 GMT
I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king
of air intake?). The parts are impossible for me to handle. I was using 2
tweezers simultaneously but after connecting 2 parts - trying to connect
third disconnected previous 2. Trying to use 'super glue' was even worse -
the parts are so small that I almost glued it to the tweezers, not to the
second part.
Is all etched brass this difficult to handle? Or it is just this particular
piece in Dragon Hummel?
Thanks god Dragon provided alternative styrene part - I will have to use
this one. The brass in pretty much devastated by my attempts and by super
glue.

Maciek
Mechanical Menace - 04 Aug 2006 12:26 GMT
> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Maciek

Hello Maciek,

I found brass kinda hard to handle at first too.
But I found out that that you will need one or twoo good quality needle
nose pliers like these:
www.mpja.com/productview.asp?product=15396+TL

And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
This is done rather easily.
You take the part you want to bend. Grip it with a pair of pliers
(small) and heat the part over the flame of a cigarette lighteruntil you
see the part change colour to a silverish colour.
Pleas practice on some scrap brass/copper.
Do not use a candle or a zippo lighter because you will end up with very
nasty blackened parts.

I would also advice to buy very sharp pointed tweezers like these:
http://www.jawadis.com/TweezersPliers.htm
Or take tweezers you already have and file and sand it to a very sharp
point.

For the rest there is a lot of practise with it, bt in the end the
result is worth it.

And remember you DON'T have to use all the parts in an etch set.

I hope this helps

Dennis Loep
ppp@yahoo.com - 05 Aug 2006 14:42 GMT
>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
>This is done rather easily.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Do not use a candle or a zippo lighter because you will end up with very
>nasty blackened parts.

Do you anneal before bending or after?  There are also kit supplied
parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H)  How
do you deal with this?
Rufus - 05 Aug 2006 16:29 GMT
>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
>>This is done rather easily.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H)  How
> do you deal with this?

Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...

Signature

     - Rufus

Mechanical Menace - 05 Aug 2006 19:29 GMT
>>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
>>>This is done rather easily.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...

Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well.
If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal.

Cheers,

Dennis
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 06:53 GMT
>>>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
>>>>This is done rather easily.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Dennis

I bend parts all the time - particularly those nice Eduard seats.  I
never anneal brass parts.  But that's just me.

Signature

     - Rufus

William H. Shuey - 07 Aug 2006 03:51 GMT
> Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well.
> If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal.

FWIW  The one area where I found annealing to be of help is when rolling
machine gun jackets for those World War I Vickers and Maxim machine
guns.

                        Bill Shuey
Mechanical Menace - 07 Aug 2006 23:52 GMT
"William H. Shuey" <whshuey@starpower.net> wrote in news:44D6AAB0.CA8ABCD3
@starpower.net:

>> Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well.
>> If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>                               Bill Shuey

Yes that too,

And also (seat)belts, straps, engine hoods, body panels, engine wiring,
fenders (especially (battle) damaged), etc., etc.

But as I have said before, it's all up to you.

Cheers,

Dennis
Ron Smith - 05 Aug 2006 19:32 GMT
> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...

I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into
tiny tubes.
Mechanical Menace - 06 Aug 2006 02:11 GMT
Ron Smith <rwsmithjr@rcn.com> wrote in news:77KdnapQ0NG6eUnZnZ2dnUVZ_v-
dnZ2d@rcn.net:

>> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...
>
> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into
> tiny tubes.

Anneal them!

They will be much easier to form.
If annealed properly you can shape them almost as easy as lead foil.

After annealing they will be not so springy and can very easily be rolled
into shape

Cheers,

Dennis.
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 06:14 GMT
Reading comprehension?

> Ron Smith <rwsmithjr@rcn.com> wrote in news:77KdnapQ0NG6eUnZnZ2dnUVZ_v-
> dnZ2d@rcn.net:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Dennis.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 06:53 GMT
>> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...
>
> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into
> tiny tubes.

That makes a bit more sense.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 09:28 GMT
>> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into
>> tiny tubes.
>
> That makes a bit more sense.

They're the only brass PE I've ever found that really needs annealing.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 16:49 GMT
>>> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into
>>> tiny tubes.
>>
>> That makes a bit more sense.
>
> They're the only brass PE I've ever found that really needs annealing.

Tight radius, I could see that.  I haven't rolled any etched MG jackets
but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such.

Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as
they are.  Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it
would do anything but make them more brittle.  I know some of the newer
Eduard sets look like they're stainless, but they are actually a thinly
plated brass...not sure why they do this.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 17:52 GMT
> Tight radius, I could see that.  I haven't rolled any etched MG jackets
> but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such.

The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.

> Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as
> they are.  Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it
> would do anything but make them more brittle.  I know some of the newer
> Eduard sets look like they're stainless, but they are actually a thinly
> plated brass...not sure why they do this.

According to their rep at AMPS a few years ago it's strictly an
appearance thing, dealers were bitching about the brass oxidizing and
looking ugly. The plating is nickel-sliver and if you need to solder a
particular joint you need to sand the plating off.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 18:17 GMT
>> Tight radius, I could see that.  I haven't rolled any etched MG
>> jackets but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such.
>
> The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.

I can imagine trying to wrap those around a needle to get them right...

>> Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as
>> they are.  Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> looking ugly. The plating is nickel-sliver and if you need to solder a
> particular joint you need to sand the plating off.

I would think they could solve the appearance problem by simply changing
the packaging - just make it air-tight.  I'd think that would be cheaper
than plating...maybe not.  As for the oxidation, I'd think that might
actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth".
Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them.

Signature

     - Rufus

Mechanical Menace - 06 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT
Rufus <srollin2@mchsi.com> wrote in news:MupBg.121029$1i1.109574
@attbi_s72:

>>> Tight radius, I could see that.  I haven't rolled any etched MG
>>> jackets but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth".
> Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them.

I think the oxidation has nothing to do with the air getting in the
packaging. I guess there is some acid from the etching procedure left
that causes the oxidation/discoloration.

Cheers,

Dennis
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 20:01 GMT
> Rufus <srollin2@mchsi.com> wrote in news:MupBg.121029$1i1.109574
> @attbi_s72:
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> Dennis

Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a
metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own unless
you coat or treat it somehow - hence Eduard's plating.  Not as bad as
pure copper, but it will lose it's shine eventually if left in the open
air.  I've only ever intentionally oxidized brass with liver of sulfer,
and even that doesn't work that well on brass...it rubs off, as I recall.

Either the packaging is/was not inert enough, or it's permiable enough
to air that it lets the parts oxidize natually.  Either way, it may be
unattractive from a marketing standpoint but it doesn't hurt the parts
any.  The only thing that would stop me from buying an etch set is if it
was visibly pitted...and I never seen one like that.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:14 GMT
> Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a
> metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own unless
> you coat or treat it somehow - hence Eduard's plating.  Not as bad as
> pure copper, but it will lose it's shine eventually if left in the open
> air.  I've only ever intentionally oxidized brass with liver of sulfer,
> and even that doesn't work that well on brass...it rubs off, as I recall.

It takes some serious chemical action like the selenium dioxide brass
black compounds to be "permanent".

> Either the packaging is/was not inert enough, or it's permiable enough
> to air that it lets the parts oxidize natually.  Either way, it may be
> unattractive from a marketing standpoint but it doesn't hurt the parts
> any.  The only thing that would stop me from buying an etch set is if it
> was visibly pitted...and I never seen one like that.

Some really old Verlinden and original Eduard stuff did pit after a few
years but I've only seen it happen in "back of the box stock" at
warehouse level distributors.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 22:50 GMT
>> Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a
>> metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> years but I've only seen it happen in "back of the box stock" at
> warehouse level distributors.

I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice
brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life".  Fortunately I've
never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 23:18 GMT
> I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice
> brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life".  Fortunately I've
> never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs.

I've never seen anything but copper from Verlinden.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 23:42 GMT
>> I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice
>> brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life".  Fortunately
>> I've never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs.
>
> I've never seen anything but copper from Verlinden.

I don't use much Verlinden stuff anymore as Eduard augments most of the
aircraft kits I have quite nicely, and I don't use much resin of late
other than replacement ejection seats.  Though I want to grab that new
1/32 P-38F/G/H conversion from Cutting edge...bad...

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:11 GMT
> I think the oxidation has nothing to do with the air getting in the
> packaging. I guess there is some acid from the etching procedure left
> that causes the oxidation/discoloration.

First it is not acid, the most common etchant for cuprous alloys is
29.5% aqueaous ammonia, the second most common is ferric chloride.
Secondly the parts are rinsed, neutralized then rinsed again
specifically to remove all residual etchant to prevent future problems.
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:09 GMT
>> The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.>>
>
> I can imagine trying to wrap those around a needle to get them right...

Drill blanks actually.

>> According to their rep at AMPS a few years ago it's strictly an
>> appearance thing, dealers were bitching about the brass oxidizing and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth".
> Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them.

Paint and glue did stick better to the raw brass, I now rarely use
Eduard because of that and the soldering issue. I solder structural
joints and joints prone to a lot of felxion while handling/masking.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 22:47 GMT
>>> The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.>>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Eduard because of that and the soldering issue. I solder structural
> joints and joints prone to a lot of felxion while handling/masking.

I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see
where I'd like to do that.  The flexability and working time issues are
one of the reasons I use watch crystal cement over thick CA - I find it
works best on larger flat surfaced joins, and can also be built up into
a small amount of structural support while offering a longer working time.

I could see where soldering might be easier, though.

Signature

     - Rufus

Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 23:18 GMT
> I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see
> where I'd like to do that.  The flexability and working time issues are
> one of the reasons I use watch crystal cement over thick CA - I find it
> works best on larger flat surfaced joins, and can also be built up into
> a small amount of structural support while offering a longer working time.

I started soldering on armor kits, some things like complex racks, skirt
hangers, muffler shields and the joint for MG cooling jackets.

> I could see where soldering might be easier, though.

I tend to solder cranes and such on ships along with the hand turned
brass masts & yards. But then I used to solder microcircuits for a
living so to me it's second nature.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 23:34 GMT
>> I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see
>> where I'd like to do that.  The flexability and working time issues
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I started soldering on armor kits, some things like complex racks, skirt
> hangers, muffler shields and the joint for MG cooling jackets.

So far I've only tried to use etch on one armor subject - a DML SA-9
Gaskin, and that was a bit of an afterthought.  I get the impression
that using etch on armor takes a bit more planning than using it on an
aircraft kit.  More structure, and detail in general.  I'm looking
forward to trying something more complex with more parts...like that
fine Trumpeter loco...

>> I could see where soldering might be easier, though.
>
> I tend to solder cranes and such on ships along with the hand turned
> brass masts & yards. But then I used to solder microcircuits for a
> living so to me it's second nature.

Got the Eduard set and a 1/72 Revell U-boat in waiting.  That'll be my
first try with a ship.  Already planning to replace the plastic railing
with ones constructed from brass rod.

I used to do some silver soldering back in my jewelry making days in
high school, but that's pretty coarse compared to your line of work.

Signature

     - Rufus

Mechanical Menace - 05 Aug 2006 19:22 GMT
>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts.
>>This is done rather easily.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H)  How
> do you deal with this?

Anneal the part before bending.
This makes the part bend more easily and takes out the "springiness"

The DML/Dragon (and some other producers) stainless steel parts are also
etched.

I have never tried to anneal stainless steel, I can only suggest to snip
off a scrap piece and try it.
And then tell us your experience.

Cheers,

Dennis
Don Stauffer - 04 Aug 2006 14:45 GMT
> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Maciek

It does take some practice.  I use the gel version of super glue- I find
it a little easier.  I have to constantly wipe my tweezers clean.  I
have learned not to blow at my workbench to clean dust and scraps away
while I have photo etched brass out, and not to cough or sneeze at the
bench :-)  I also find working with PE is easier on a humid day than a
dry one- the brass seems to be affected by static electricity.  I have
done a model ship with a PE accessory package.  There were dozens of PE
parts, and doing that ship I finally got the hang of it.

Awhile ago I bought a very good set of needle-nozed tweezers from a
retiring dentist.  Such high grade tweezers are essential to working
with PE.
Mechanical Menace - 04 Aug 2006 17:23 GMT
>> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
>> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> retiring dentist.  Such high grade tweezers are essential to working
> with PE.

The brass is not affected by static electricity, but the superglue
hardens as result of a chemical reaction with the moisture in the air.
(at least that's what I have understood once)

There is moisture in the skin of your fingers, that's why they work so
fabulously well with superglue.

What I have noticed however is that when you use a brass or copper pin
as glue applicator and dip that in the bottle, the life expectancy of
the bottled glue drastically drops.
Anybody have noticed that too, and have a clue.

Cheers,

Dennis Loep
Rufus - 05 Aug 2006 00:38 GMT
> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Maciek

Maybe you just bit off a bit more than you should have to start with.  I
started into using etched parts with simple things like seat belt
buckles when I was a teenager...now I regularly fold and form complex
etched parts without any special tools.  Granted, I also have some
metalsmithing background, but even so I took some years to gain the
skills with etched parts that I have now - so don't get discouraged.

I think it probably would have been better for you to get a kit you
want, and then choose an etch set for it that you think you can deal
with - I like the Eduard line myself.  That way, you can look over the
etched parts to see if they look like you can work with them vice
opening a kit and sweating it out...

Tip - one thing I've learned about dealing with small etched parts is
not to try to move, hold, bend, etc. them with your fingers.  Use a tool
- a needle in a pin vise, tweezers, a toothpick, whatever - to prod,
poke, and position.  If you use a very sharp needle you can even "stick"
parts to pick them up without doing noticable damage to the part.

I also use both thick CA glue and watch crystal cement to attach etched
parts depending on where they go.  Both types of glue have slightly
longer working times.  Postition the part, and then use a needle (my
favorite CA applicator - some use the eye end, I just place a drop on
the sharp end) to bleed glue between the part and the plastic.

I also very rarely paint etched parts prior to attachment - glue them
directly to bare plastic for best results.  Then trim, file, paint as
required.

Signature

     - Rufus

Serge D. Grun - 06 Aug 2006 21:12 GMT
> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the parts are so small that I almost glued it to the tweezers, not to the
> second part.

- Take a small bit of modeling clay or UHU-tack to something heavy that
won't move, like your working table or cutting mat;

- assemble the parts on the bit of clay, WITHOUT any glue; if possible,
place the parts so that the clay holds them in place without touching
the glueing areas

- once you're satisfied with the relative position of the parts, use a
tiny loop of fine wire to flow some extra-thin superglue in the joints
between the etched parts. Capillarity will do the rest.

> Is all etched brass this difficult to handle? Or it is just this particular
> piece in Dragon Hummel?
> Thanks god Dragon provided alternative styrene part - I will have to use
> this one. The brass in pretty much devastated by my attempts and by super
> glue.

Don't despair, brass can be bent back into shape and superglue cleans
quite easily, even from the tiny parts.

Signature

-sdg

"Un gromono, mon royaume pour un gromono!"
                        Shakespeare - Richard III

Rusty White - 08 Aug 2006 15:18 GMT
Try my how to CD,  "Working With Photo Etched Parts".  It has lots of
full color photos and answers just about every question you can think
of concerning photo etched parts.  Check it out at: flagshipmodels.com

Rusty White
Flagship Models Inc.
flagshipmodels.com

> I have to admit that it was a total disaster.
> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Maciek
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.