My first time - etched brass
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Maciek - 04 Aug 2006 07:10 GMT I have to admit that it was a total disaster. I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king of air intake?). The parts are impossible for me to handle. I was using 2 tweezers simultaneously but after connecting 2 parts - trying to connect third disconnected previous 2. Trying to use 'super glue' was even worse - the parts are so small that I almost glued it to the tweezers, not to the second part. Is all etched brass this difficult to handle? Or it is just this particular piece in Dragon Hummel? Thanks god Dragon provided alternative styrene part - I will have to use this one. The brass in pretty much devastated by my attempts and by super glue.
Maciek
Mechanical Menace - 04 Aug 2006 12:26 GMT > I have to admit that it was a total disaster. > I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Maciek Hello Maciek,
I found brass kinda hard to handle at first too. But I found out that that you will need one or twoo good quality needle nose pliers like these: www.mpja.com/productview.asp?product=15396+TL
And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. This is done rather easily. You take the part you want to bend. Grip it with a pair of pliers (small) and heat the part over the flame of a cigarette lighteruntil you see the part change colour to a silverish colour. Pleas practice on some scrap brass/copper. Do not use a candle or a zippo lighter because you will end up with very nasty blackened parts.
I would also advice to buy very sharp pointed tweezers like these: http://www.jawadis.com/TweezersPliers.htm Or take tweezers you already have and file and sand it to a very sharp point.
For the rest there is a lot of practise with it, bt in the end the result is worth it.
And remember you DON'T have to use all the parts in an etch set.
I hope this helps
Dennis Loep
ppp@yahoo.com - 05 Aug 2006 14:42 GMT >And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. >This is done rather easily. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Do not use a candle or a zippo lighter because you will end up with very >nasty blackened parts. Do you anneal before bending or after? There are also kit supplied parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H) How do you deal with this?
Rufus - 05 Aug 2006 16:29 GMT >>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. >>This is done rather easily. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H) How > do you deal with this? Personally, I've never annealed etched parts...
 Signature - Rufus
Mechanical Menace - 05 Aug 2006 19:29 GMT >>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. >>>This is done rather easily. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Personally, I've never annealed etched parts... Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well. If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal.
Cheers,
Dennis
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 06:53 GMT >>>>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. >>>>This is done rather easily. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Dennis I bend parts all the time - particularly those nice Eduard seats. I never anneal brass parts. But that's just me.
 Signature - Rufus
William H. Shuey - 07 Aug 2006 03:51 GMT > Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well. > If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal. FWIW The one area where I found annealing to be of help is when rolling machine gun jackets for those World War I Vickers and Maxim machine guns.
Bill Shuey
Mechanical Menace - 07 Aug 2006 23:52 GMT "William H. Shuey" <whshuey@starpower.net> wrote in news:44D6AAB0.CA8ABCD3 @starpower.net:
>> Of course annealing is not obligatory, but I found it works very well. >> If you need to keep parts straight then you DON'T anneal. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Bill Shuey Yes that too,
And also (seat)belts, straps, engine hoods, body panels, engine wiring, fenders (especially (battle) damaged), etc., etc.
But as I have said before, it's all up to you.
Cheers,
Dennis
Ron Smith - 05 Aug 2006 19:32 GMT > Personally, I've never annealed etched parts... I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into tiny tubes.
Mechanical Menace - 06 Aug 2006 02:11 GMT Ron Smith <rwsmithjr@rcn.com> wrote in news:77KdnapQ0NG6eUnZnZ2dnUVZ_v- dnZ2d@rcn.net:
>> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts... > > I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into > tiny tubes. Anneal them!
They will be much easier to form. If annealed properly you can shape them almost as easy as lead foil.
After annealing they will be not so springy and can very easily be rolled into shape
Cheers,
Dennis.
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 06:14 GMT Reading comprehension?
> Ron Smith <rwsmithjr@rcn.com> wrote in news:77KdnapQ0NG6eUnZnZ2dnUVZ_v- > dnZ2d@rcn.net: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Dennis. Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 06:53 GMT >> Personally, I've never annealed etched parts... > > I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into > tiny tubes. That makes a bit more sense.
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 09:28 GMT >> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into >> tiny tubes. > > That makes a bit more sense. They're the only brass PE I've ever found that really needs annealing.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 16:49 GMT >>> I have but only cooling jackets for MG's that need to be rolled into >>> tiny tubes. >> >> That makes a bit more sense. > > They're the only brass PE I've ever found that really needs annealing. Tight radius, I could see that. I haven't rolled any etched MG jackets but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such.
Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as they are. Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it would do anything but make them more brittle. I know some of the newer Eduard sets look like they're stainless, but they are actually a thinly plated brass...not sure why they do this.
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 17:52 GMT > Tight radius, I could see that. I haven't rolled any etched MG jackets > but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such. The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.
> Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as > they are. Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it > would do anything but make them more brittle. I know some of the newer > Eduard sets look like they're stainless, but they are actually a thinly > plated brass...not sure why they do this. According to their rep at AMPS a few years ago it's strictly an appearance thing, dealers were bitching about the brass oxidizing and looking ugly. The plating is nickel-sliver and if you need to solder a particular joint you need to sand the plating off.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 18:17 GMT >> Tight radius, I could see that. I haven't rolled any etched MG >> jackets but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such. > > The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets. I can imagine trying to wrap those around a needle to get them right...
>> Anealling would make the aircraft parts I've used too soft, as thin as >> they are. Haven't used any stainless parts in years, and I doubt it [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > looking ugly. The plating is nickel-sliver and if you need to solder a > particular joint you need to sand the plating off. I would think they could solve the appearance problem by simply changing the packaging - just make it air-tight. I'd think that would be cheaper than plating...maybe not. As for the oxidation, I'd think that might actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth". Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them.
 Signature - Rufus
Mechanical Menace - 06 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT Rufus <srollin2@mchsi.com> wrote in news:MupBg.121029$1i1.109574 @attbi_s72:
>>> Tight radius, I could see that. I haven't rolled any etched MG >>> jackets but I'll keep this in mind if ever get around to such. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth". > Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them. I think the oxidation has nothing to do with the air getting in the packaging. I guess there is some acid from the etching procedure left that causes the oxidation/discoloration.
Cheers,
Dennis
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 20:01 GMT > Rufus <srollin2@mchsi.com> wrote in news:MupBg.121029$1i1.109574 > @attbi_s72: [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Dennis Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own unless you coat or treat it somehow - hence Eduard's plating. Not as bad as pure copper, but it will lose it's shine eventually if left in the open air. I've only ever intentionally oxidized brass with liver of sulfer, and even that doesn't work that well on brass...it rubs off, as I recall.
Either the packaging is/was not inert enough, or it's permiable enough to air that it lets the parts oxidize natually. Either way, it may be unattractive from a marketing standpoint but it doesn't hurt the parts any. The only thing that would stop me from buying an etch set is if it was visibly pitted...and I never seen one like that.
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:14 GMT > Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a > metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own unless > you coat or treat it somehow - hence Eduard's plating. Not as bad as > pure copper, but it will lose it's shine eventually if left in the open > air. I've only ever intentionally oxidized brass with liver of sulfer, > and even that doesn't work that well on brass...it rubs off, as I recall. It takes some serious chemical action like the selenium dioxide brass black compounds to be "permanent".
> Either the packaging is/was not inert enough, or it's permiable enough > to air that it lets the parts oxidize natually. Either way, it may be > unattractive from a marketing standpoint but it doesn't hurt the parts > any. The only thing that would stop me from buying an etch set is if it > was visibly pitted...and I never seen one like that. Some really old Verlinden and original Eduard stuff did pit after a few years but I've only seen it happen in "back of the box stock" at warehouse level distributors.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 22:50 GMT >> Then that's simply a process problem - I've etched brass as a >> metalsmith, and it will naturally tarnish a bit left on it's own [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > years but I've only seen it happen in "back of the box stock" at > warehouse level distributors. I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life". Fortunately I've never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs.
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 23:18 GMT > I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice > brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life". Fortunately I've > never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs. I've never seen anything but copper from Verlinden.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 23:42 GMT >> I know a lot of the Verlinden stuff I've seen recently is copper, vice >> brass...I could see that stuff having a "shelf life". Fortunately >> I've never gotten hold of one of those old-dogs. > > I've never seen anything but copper from Verlinden. I don't use much Verlinden stuff anymore as Eduard augments most of the aircraft kits I have quite nicely, and I don't use much resin of late other than replacement ejection seats. Though I want to grab that new 1/32 P-38F/G/H conversion from Cutting edge...bad...
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:11 GMT > I think the oxidation has nothing to do with the air getting in the > packaging. I guess there is some acid from the etching procedure left > that causes the oxidation/discoloration. First it is not acid, the most common etchant for cuprous alloys is 29.5% aqueaous ammonia, the second most common is ferric chloride. Secondly the parts are rinsed, neutralized then rinsed again specifically to remove all residual etchant to prevent future problems.
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 21:09 GMT >> The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.>> > > I can imagine trying to wrap those around a needle to get them right... Drill blanks actually.
>> According to their rep at AMPS a few years ago it's strictly an >> appearance thing, dealers were bitching about the brass oxidizing and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > actually help paint stick to the parts...give them a bit more "tooth". > Though I've never had any trouble getting enamels to stick to them. Paint and glue did stick better to the raw brass, I now rarely use Eduard because of that and the soldering issue. I solder structural joints and joints prone to a lot of felxion while handling/masking.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 22:47 GMT >>> The worst so far are 1/35 .30 cal jackets.>> >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Eduard because of that and the soldering issue. I solder structural > joints and joints prone to a lot of felxion while handling/masking. I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see where I'd like to do that. The flexability and working time issues are one of the reasons I use watch crystal cement over thick CA - I find it works best on larger flat surfaced joins, and can also be built up into a small amount of structural support while offering a longer working time.
I could see where soldering might be easier, though.
 Signature - Rufus
Ron Smith - 06 Aug 2006 23:18 GMT > I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see > where I'd like to do that. The flexability and working time issues are > one of the reasons I use watch crystal cement over thick CA - I find it > works best on larger flat surfaced joins, and can also be built up into > a small amount of structural support while offering a longer working time. I started soldering on armor kits, some things like complex racks, skirt hangers, muffler shields and the joint for MG cooling jackets.
> I could see where soldering might be easier, though. I tend to solder cranes and such on ships along with the hand turned brass masts & yards. But then I used to solder microcircuits for a living so to me it's second nature.
Rufus - 06 Aug 2006 23:34 GMT >> I've never tried soldering etch, but there are some parts I could see >> where I'd like to do that. The flexability and working time issues [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I started soldering on armor kits, some things like complex racks, skirt > hangers, muffler shields and the joint for MG cooling jackets. So far I've only tried to use etch on one armor subject - a DML SA-9 Gaskin, and that was a bit of an afterthought. I get the impression that using etch on armor takes a bit more planning than using it on an aircraft kit. More structure, and detail in general. I'm looking forward to trying something more complex with more parts...like that fine Trumpeter loco...
>> I could see where soldering might be easier, though. > > I tend to solder cranes and such on ships along with the hand turned > brass masts & yards. But then I used to solder microcircuits for a > living so to me it's second nature. Got the Eduard set and a 1/72 Revell U-boat in waiting. That'll be my first try with a ship. Already planning to replace the plastic railing with ones constructed from brass rod.
I used to do some silver soldering back in my jewelry making days in high school, but that's pretty coarse compared to your line of work.
 Signature - Rufus
Mechanical Menace - 05 Aug 2006 19:22 GMT >>And you have to "anneal" the coper or brass parts. >>This is done rather easily. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > parts that look like laser cut stainless steel. (Dragon Ta 152H) How > do you deal with this? Anneal the part before bending. This makes the part bend more easily and takes out the "springiness"
The DML/Dragon (and some other producers) stainless steel parts are also etched.
I have never tried to anneal stainless steel, I can only suggest to snip off a scrap piece and try it. And then tell us your experience.
Cheers,
Dennis
Don Stauffer - 04 Aug 2006 14:45 GMT > I have to admit that it was a total disaster. > I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Maciek It does take some practice. I use the gel version of super glue- I find it a little easier. I have to constantly wipe my tweezers clean. I have learned not to blow at my workbench to clean dust and scraps away while I have photo etched brass out, and not to cough or sneeze at the bench :-) I also find working with PE is easier on a humid day than a dry one- the brass seems to be affected by static electricity. I have done a model ship with a PE accessory package. There were dozens of PE parts, and doing that ship I finally got the hang of it.
Awhile ago I bought a very good set of needle-nozed tweezers from a retiring dentist. Such high grade tweezers are essential to working with PE.
Mechanical Menace - 04 Aug 2006 17:23 GMT >> I have to admit that it was a total disaster. >> I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > retiring dentist. Such high grade tweezers are essential to working > with PE. The brass is not affected by static electricity, but the superglue hardens as result of a chemical reaction with the moisture in the air. (at least that's what I have understood once)
There is moisture in the skin of your fingers, that's why they work so fabulously well with superglue.
What I have noticed however is that when you use a brass or copper pin as glue applicator and dip that in the bottle, the life expectancy of the bottled glue drastically drops. Anybody have noticed that too, and have a clue.
Cheers,
Dennis Loep
Rufus - 05 Aug 2006 00:38 GMT > I have to admit that it was a total disaster. > I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Maciek Maybe you just bit off a bit more than you should have to start with. I started into using etched parts with simple things like seat belt buckles when I was a teenager...now I regularly fold and form complex etched parts without any special tools. Granted, I also have some metalsmithing background, but even so I took some years to gain the skills with etched parts that I have now - so don't get discouraged.
I think it probably would have been better for you to get a kit you want, and then choose an etch set for it that you think you can deal with - I like the Eduard line myself. That way, you can look over the etched parts to see if they look like you can work with them vice opening a kit and sweating it out...
Tip - one thing I've learned about dealing with small etched parts is not to try to move, hold, bend, etc. them with your fingers. Use a tool - a needle in a pin vise, tweezers, a toothpick, whatever - to prod, poke, and position. If you use a very sharp needle you can even "stick" parts to pick them up without doing noticable damage to the part.
I also use both thick CA glue and watch crystal cement to attach etched parts depending on where they go. Both types of glue have slightly longer working times. Postition the part, and then use a needle (my favorite CA applicator - some use the eye end, I just place a drop on the sharp end) to bleed glue between the part and the plastic.
I also very rarely paint etched parts prior to attachment - glue them directly to bare plastic for best results. Then trim, file, paint as required.
 Signature - Rufus
Serge D. Grun - 06 Aug 2006 21:12 GMT > I have to admit that it was a total disaster. > I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the parts are so small that I almost glued it to the tweezers, not to the > second part. - Take a small bit of modeling clay or UHU-tack to something heavy that won't move, like your working table or cutting mat;
- assemble the parts on the bit of clay, WITHOUT any glue; if possible, place the parts so that the clay holds them in place without touching the glueing areas
- once you're satisfied with the relative position of the parts, use a tiny loop of fine wire to flow some extra-thin superglue in the joints between the etched parts. Capillarity will do the rest.
> Is all etched brass this difficult to handle? Or it is just this particular > piece in Dragon Hummel? > Thanks god Dragon provided alternative styrene part - I will have to use > this one. The brass in pretty much devastated by my attempts and by super > glue. Don't despair, brass can be bent back into shape and superglue cleans quite easily, even from the tiny parts.
 Signature -sdg
"Un gromono, mon royaume pour un gromono!" Shakespeare - Richard III
Rusty White - 08 Aug 2006 15:18 GMT Try my how to CD, "Working With Photo Etched Parts". It has lots of full color photos and answers just about every question you can think of concerning photo etched parts. Check it out at: flagshipmodels.com
Rusty White Flagship Models Inc. flagshipmodels.com
> I have to admit that it was a total disaster. > I was trying to make Dragon early Hummel engine exhaust (or is it some king [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Maciek
|
|
|