Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Airfix in administration !

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
srn4@ntlworld.com - 31 Aug 2006 13:36 GMT
From the BBC Website

Sticky future for kitmaker Airfix

Iconic model-maker name Airfix faces an uncertain future following
parent firm Humbrol's entry into administration.

Since 1949, generations of children have struggled over plastic kit
parts and tubes of glue.

In its heyday, Airfix specialised in planes, ships and tanks of World
War II - among them favourites such as the Spitfire fighter and
Lancaster bomber.

Thirty-one of 41 staff at the Hull firm have lost their jobs, with
Grant Thornton of Leeds named administrators.

'Capable of sale'

The firm had been hit by "severe cash flow pressures" and also a
disruption in supplies from its principal manufacturer in France,
Heller SA.

The appointed administrator, Keith Hinds, told BBC Radio Four's Today
programme that Airfix was an "iconic brand" which was "capable of
onward sale and investment".

"The company's been struggling for some time under the demise of
general manufacturing and the lack of demand for some of its
products," he said.

That had caused losses to build up, with cash-flow difficulties
following - only for further trouble to come as Heller, too, went into
administration.

"That's caused a blockage in supplies -- the accumulation of all that
has brought about the insolvency of the company, Humbrol," said Mr
Hinds.

'Great shame'

Jeremy Brook, of the Airfix Collectors Club, said it was a sad day for
those with fond memories of having sticky fingers as they struggled
with often intricate kit arrangements.

"When you think of construction kits, you think of Airfix," he said.

"All the schoolboys of the 50s, 60s and 70s remember them, being
covered in glue and cutting your fingers as you assembled them.

"It's a great shame if Airfix is going to languish or go completely."

The Airfix range also included helicopters, cars, motorcycles,
figures, trains, spaceships, sci-fi figures, and movie-related
characters.

Last year it also announced it was launching a range of robot fighters
from the 45th Century.

Humbrol is the principal trading business of the Hobby Products Group
Ltd, which is also in administration.

The administrators said the group turnover was approximately £10m a
year, and other brand names owned by the group include Plasticine,
Supercast and Young Scientist.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/business/5301438.stm

Published: 2006/08/31 11:07:41 GMT
bluumule - 31 Aug 2006 14:46 GMT
>From all the discussions on this forum about Airfix, I don't think it
was unexpected, though a shame never the less.  Who will step up and
purchase them?  Could it be someone in eastern Europe?  

Jerry
Enzo Matrix - 31 Aug 2006 16:15 GMT
>> From all the discussions on this forum about Airfix, I don't think it
> was unexpected, though a shame never the less.  Who will step up and
> purchase them?  Could it be someone in eastern Europe?

Let's hope for Eduard!   They are currently doing wonders with a hi-tech
version of the Airfix Spitfire 24.

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

kim - 31 Aug 2006 18:09 GMT
> >> From all the discussions on this forum about Airfix, I don't think it
> > was unexpected, though a shame never the less.  Who will step up and
> > purchase them?  Could it be someone in eastern Europe?
>
> Let's hope for Eduard!   They are currently doing wonders with a hi-tech
> version of the Airfix Spitfire 24.

I am guessing it will be someone in Poland. Labour costs are low and there
is a strong following for Airfix kits of types used by Polish RAF squadrons.
These can also be sold (with different markings) to Belgium, Noway and
Holland as well as the UK of course.

(kim)
bluumule - 31 Aug 2006 20:13 GMT
> I am guessing it will be someone in Poland. Labour costs are low and there
> is a strong following for Airfix kits of types used by Polish RAF squadrons.
> These can also be sold (with different markings) to Belgium, Noway and
> Holland as well as the UK of course.
>
> (kim)

There seems to be a economic hunger in Poland and Czech Republic.
Notice the industrial upswing with smaller manufacturing processes as
they consolidate or merge.  Is it influenced by something we in the
west would call organized c....?

Many US companies have been importing labor from the region, but now it
seems the good life has arrived for them there so those US companies
are not getting the recruits they once were.  So many are considering
or have shifted production to the region.  Does the word 'Outsourcing'
ring a bell?
JJ (UK) - 09 Sep 2006 22:01 GMT
But has anyone made the 'perhaps the business model just fell apart' joke
yet?

JJ (UK)
Doug Wagner - 10 Sep 2006 21:31 GMT
> But has anyone made the 'perhaps the business model just fell apart' joke
> yet?
>
> JJ (UK)

No, thank God!

Doug Wagner
PaPaPeng - 01 Sep 2006 02:02 GMT
>>From all the discussions on this forum about Airfix, I don't think it
>was unexpected, though a shame never the less.  Who will step up and
>purchase them?  Could it be someone in eastern Europe?  
>
>Jerry

One can hope that a Chinese manufacturer will buy the molds and
reissue the models as AIRFIX or under their own label.  Its a surprise
that AIRFIX didn't subcontract their kits to China earlier.  The
company's kits have been around for some 40 years now and they haven't
issued anything new for the last decade or so.  Therefore there wasn't
anything in the form of trade secrets to protect.
Enzo Matrix - 01 Sep 2006 10:10 GMT
>>> From all the discussions on this forum about Airfix, I don't think
>>> it
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> company's kits have been around for some 40 years now and they haven't
> issued anything new for the last decade or so.

TSR2?

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Serge D. Grun - 01 Sep 2006 19:25 GMT
> One can hope that a Chinese manufacturer will buy the molds and
> reissue the models as AIRFIX or under their own label.  Its a surprise
> that AIRFIX didn't subcontract their kits to China earlier.  The
> company's kits have been around for some 40 years now and they haven't
> issued anything new for the last decade or so.  Therefore there wasn't
> anything in the form of trade secrets to protect.

You've been on Mars for the last 40 years ?

Signature

-sdg. And, uhm... brought any martian kits you'd be willing to part
with, btw ?

"Un gromono, mon royaume pour un gromono!"
                        Shakespeare - Richard III

PaPaPeng - 01 Sep 2006 21:45 GMT
>You've been on Mars for the last 40 years ?

I started with Airfix in the late 60s and just about built their whole
WWII military models offering.  I haven't seen anything new from them
for the past 20 years.  I still have their catalog from the 90s
(collector's item?) that showed the same models from as far back as I
remember.  I am not into company histories, just what I see in the
shops and draw my conclusions from there.
William H. Shuey - 31 Aug 2006 22:09 GMT
> From the BBC Website
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thirty-one of 41 staff at the Hull firm have lost their jobs, with
> Grant Thornton of Leeds named administrators.

    Well, there goes the 1/48 Canberras.

                    Bill Shuey
Mad-Modeller - 01 Sep 2006 04:20 GMT
Talk about serendipity!  I just ordered a Caravelle from Squadron today.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Bob - 01 Sep 2006 13:36 GMT
Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history too?

> From the BBC Website
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
> Published: 2006/08/31 11:07:41 GMT
kim - 01 Sep 2006 15:12 GMT
> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history too?

According to a well-known model dealer in Humbrol's home town that will be
no great loss as the quality of their paints has fallen off a cliff in
recent years.

(kim)
Enzo Matrix - 01 Sep 2006 15:18 GMT
>> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history
>> too?
>
> According to a well-known model dealer in Humbrol's home town that
> will be no great loss as the quality of their paints has fallen off a
> cliff in recent years.

Can I say "Xtracolor"?

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Mad-Modeller - 02 Sep 2006 04:40 GMT
> >> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history
> >> too?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Only if Squadron starts offering them.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Stephen Tontoni - 02 Sep 2006 09:26 GMT
> >> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history
> >> too?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Can I say "Xtracolor"?

Floquil Military Classic colors... I hoarded so much, it's embarrassing!

- Stephen
William H. Shuey - 06 Sep 2006 19:16 GMT
> Floquil Military Classic colors... I hoarded so much, it's embarrassing!

    Never apologize for being smart. I wish I had put back more of their
military colors.

                    Bill Shuey
Alan Dicey - 02 Sep 2006 18:59 GMT
>>> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history
>>> too?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Can I say "Xtracolor"?

Can I reply "not for brushing" :-)

Humbrol paints are all made in China, so it is likely that the paint
line will continue to be sold through the administrators as it is just a
matter of keeping the distribution going.  What might get into short
supply are such items as Maskol, Liquid Poly and the varnishes.

The kit tooling is all in France, I believe.
Enzo Matrix - 02 Sep 2006 19:45 GMT
>>>> Bugger! Does this mean Humbrol enamels are now going to be history
>>>> too?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Can I reply "not for brushing" :-)

Ooh!  I Did Not Know That!  :-D

I've only ever sprayed it.

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Alan Dicey - 03 Sep 2006 09:34 GMT
>>> Can I say "Xtracolor"?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I've only ever sprayed it.

Too thin for good coverage and brushmarks show up very easily.  It's
thinned down to airbrush consistency in the tin.
Bill Davies - 03 Sep 2006 22:53 GMT
> The kit tooling is all in France, I believe.

I've seen it suggested elsewhere that Heller "owns" the tooling. I always
presumed that Heller were contracted to produce the kits, using tooling
owned by Airfix, after f Heller was sold by Humbrol a few years back. Anyone
clarify?
Cheers,
Bill.
kim - 04 Sep 2006 02:03 GMT
> > The kit tooling is all in France, I believe.
>
> I've seen it suggested elsewhere that Heller "owns" the tooling. I always
> presumed that Heller were contracted to produce the kits, using tooling
> owned by Airfix, after f Heller was sold by Humbrol a few years back. Anyone
> clarify?

See Uncle Pat's column:-

http://www.mremag.demon.co.uk/hpsite/index.htm

"It is understood that, in bidding for Humbrol, Hornby has reservations
about the fact that Heller owns the moulds for Airfix kits."

It works like this: Airfix has a reputation for supplying *reasonbale*
quality kits at *reasonable* prices. If a prospective bidder is forced to
pay an exhorbitant sum for the moulds they will then in turn have to pass on
that cost to their customers. That would make the acquisition non-viable.

(kim)
GRAHAM WALKER - 04 Sep 2006 20:49 GMT
mmmmm but how did heller get to own the airfix moulds, for sure airfix would
not get shot of their own assets

>> "Alan Dicey" <alan@removethis.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk> wrote in
> message
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> (kim)
kim - 05 Sep 2006 05:48 GMT
> mmmmm but how did heller get to own the airfix moulds, for sure airfix would
> not get shot of their own assets

It wouldn't be up to them. Their parent company will have sold the physical
assets and kept the intellectual rights. There is some dispute as to exactly
who the parent company of Airfix currently is? Some sources say it's
Humbrol. Some say it's the company which owns Humbrol. Some say it's the
company which owns the company which owns Humbrol.

(kim)
John Walker - 05 Sep 2006 19:28 GMT
> mmmmm but how did heller get to own the airfix moulds, for sure airfix
> would not get shot of their own assets

Heller don't own the Airfix moulds. Humbrol is the major (only?) trading arm
of a company called Hobby Products Group. Airfix in turn is a brand
belonging to Humbrol. Humbrol also owned Heller until about 9 months ago
when a deal was reached to sell the Heller plant to it's management. Humbrol
retained ownership of all the moulds from both the Airfix and Heller
catalogues. Heller would be a contract moulder for Humbrol.

In July the new Heller management placed the company in administration.
Subsequently it would seem a dispute arose between Heller's administrators
and Humbrol's management which resulted in Heller refusing to supply any
products - kits- to Humbrol. It would seem that it is this drying up of
their principal supply stream tat has forced Humbrol into administration.

John
Serge D. Grun - 05 Sep 2006 19:52 GMT
> In July the new Heller management placed the company in administration.
> Subsequently it would seem a dispute arose between Heller's administrators
> and Humbrol's management which resulted in Heller refusing to supply any
> products - kits- to Humbrol. It would seem that it is this drying up of
> their principal supply stream tat has forced Humbrol into administration.

Ah, the Frogs won't miss any opportunity to annoy the Brits, and the
Brits won't miss any opportunity to blame it on the Frogs...

Signature

-sdg

"Un gromono, mon royaume pour un gromono!"
                        Shakespeare - Richard III

Bill Davies - 05 Sep 2006 22:07 GMT
> Heller don't own the Airfix moulds. Humbrol is the major (only?) trading arm
> of a company called Hobby Products Group. Airfix in turn is a brand
> belonging to Humbrol. Humbrol also owned Heller until about 9 months ago
> when a deal was reached to sell the Heller plant to it's management. Humbrol
> retained ownership of all the moulds from both the Airfix and Heller
> catalogues. Heller would be a contract moulder for Humbrol.

Thanks Graham,
That's pretty much how I understood the situation,
Cheers,
Bill.
Bill Davies - 05 Sep 2006 09:01 GMT
> "It is understood that, in bidding for Humbrol, Hornby has reservations
> about the fact that Heller owns the moulds for Airfix kits."

I would want to know the source of that information before accepting it as
correct. There's little business sense in operating in that way, though
sense is often lacking in business.
Chers,
Bill.
kim - 05 Sep 2006 15:09 GMT
> > "It is understood that, in bidding for Humbrol, Hornby has reservations
> > about the fact that Heller owns the moulds for Airfix kits."
>
> I would want to know the source of that information before accepting it as
> correct.

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1863350,00.html

> There's little business sense in operating in that way, though
> sense is often lacking in business.

Buying famous brand names and selling off their physical assets is standard
business practice in the UK. Airfix' model railway tooling was sold off many
years ago.

(kim)
Bill Davies - 05 Sep 2006 16:33 GMT
> Buying famous brand names and selling off their physical assets is standard
> business practice in the UK. Airfix' model railway tooling was sold off many
> years ago.

The railway tooling was sold, the products made from those tools are now
sold under the Dapol name. If Humbrol was purchasing the moulded products
form Dapol and rebranding them as Airfix, that would be a valid parallel. I
can't see that the suggested situation with Heller has much in common with
this arrangement,
Cheers,
Bill.
kim - 05 Sep 2006 19:09 GMT
> > Buying famous brand names and selling off their physical assets is
> standard
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> can't see that the suggested situation with Heller has much in common with
> this arrangement,

Some of the former "Airfix" products sold by Dapol were always made by Kader
in the far east and have since been rebranded as "Bachmann" products. The
moulds were never physically owend by Airfix or Dapol.

(kim)
Bill Davies - 05 Sep 2006 22:01 GMT
> Some of the former "Airfix" products sold by Dapol were always made by Kader
> in the far east and have since been rebranded as "Bachmann" products. The
> moulds were never physically owend by Airfix or Dapol.

There is some confusion here. I thought we were discussing the Airfix model
railway construction kits, most of which originated with Kitmaster before
being bought by Airfix upon that company's demise. These tools always
remained the property of Airfix until sold to Dapol. At no point after that
did Airfix market products from the tools thay had formerly owned.
I believe that Kader always owned the Mainline tooling in Hong Kong. This
has become somewhat muddied following Mainline's purchase of the Airfix
range, the latter (as far as I am aware) had nothing to do with Kader. Kader
subsequently bought Bachmann sometime around 1987, launching many of the
former Mainline tools they owned under the Bachmann Branchline brand.
Cheers,
Bill.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.