Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
upgrading the design with new engines and weapons tech back in the 80s and
90s, but I half expected that they had moved on to something else at this
late date. Is that the oldest tank design still in major service?
WmB
Wayne - 20 Sep 2006 22:18 GMT
> Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
> getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> WmB
I guess so: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-41_tank
Ron Smith - 20 Sep 2006 22:50 GMT
M-4 Sherman based tanks in IIRC Chile.
> Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
> getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> WmB
WmB - 21 Sep 2006 12:12 GMT
> M-4 Sherman based tanks in IIRC Chile.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> WmB
Wow - M4 Shermans. I wonder if they're Israeli up-gunned types?
[lightning strikes and WmB fires up a Wiki on "Chile" and "Sherman"
yielding:]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postwar_Sherman_Tanks
They were in fact IDF postwar mods, and last saw service in 1989. That's
still a helluva long time. Poking around on that site I see Mexico has or
had some sort of vehicle (tank recovery) that utilizes a Sherman chassis as
late as 1998.
Looking at the 105 on that IDF Sherman just makes ya wish our boys in WWII
could have had IDF Shermans. In the meantime it looks like the M41 is the
B-52 of light armor.
WmB
Stephen Bierce - 21 Sep 2006 05:38 GMT
>Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
>getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>WmB
Prevailing wisdom is that tanks aren't all that useful in jungle settings. In fact, till the
U.S. Army brought in whole divisions of tanks to Vietnam, the South Vietnamese used to refer to
tanks as "voting machines"--as the only time the ARVN ever used them was to throw coups in
Saigon.
Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922
{Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
WmB - 21 Sep 2006 12:12 GMT
> >Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army
> >still
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922
> {Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
Yep - definitely a different battlefield environment. Sometimes to good
effect - the M5 Stuart from what I understand was a more viable weapons
platform in the Pacific due to the terrain conditions and the nature of
their armored opponents.
WmB
Jim Williams - 21 Sep 2006 13:30 GMT
There used to be T34-85 in the Balkans in the 90's. I don't know about now.
Jim
Gerald Owens - 21 Sep 2006 17:09 GMT
> Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
> getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> WmB
The basic T-54 design is slightly older than the M41, and the Soviets
offered continual upgrades over the succeeding decades, with IR
systems, laser rangefinders and reactive armor packages available.
Since tank hulls and turrets can pretty much last forever, as long as
parts for the mechanical systems remain available, it's pretty likely
that 1950 vintage T-54 tanks are still tooling around in various Third
World countries. Last I heard, Norway still has rebuilt M-24 tanks in
service, and Brazil totally rebuilt their Stuart tanks to keep them
functional.
Gerald Owens
RobG - 21 Sep 2006 17:21 GMT
> Did my eyes deceive me the other day on the news or is the Thai army still
> getting good service out of these? I knew they (and others) had been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> WmB
When your primary need for a tank is against your own civilian
population instead of defense against external forces, it makes sense
to keep upgrading ancient tanks rather than buy modern tanks. But, if
you notice, the Thai King's Guard uses more modern tanks than the rest
of the Thai Army. Most likely to protect him from the Army turning on
him: http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6750/front0wm.jpg
Al Superczynski - 22 Sep 2006 06:49 GMT
>...the Thai King's Guard uses more modern tanks than the rest
>of the Thai Army.
I'm pretty sure that's merely an honorific title.
>Most likely to protect him from the Army turning on him...
I doubt that would ever happen. The Thai king is deeply revered,
even loved.

Signature
Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968
My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.
Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."