Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

agitator's hat is on!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
William H. Shuey - 02 Oct 2006 06:29 GMT
Hi Troops:

    For those of us in the USA, a question. Do you think gasoline will get
down below $2 a gallon before the election, and what do you think the
odds are of it getting back up to $3 a gallon by Christmas???
    I know, I know, I'm an awful cynic!    :-)

                            Bill Shuey
Al Superczynski - 02 Oct 2006 06:39 GMT
>Do you think gasoline will get
>down below $2 a gallon before the election...

    It already is in some places.

>...and what do you think the
>odds are of it getting back up to $3 a gallon by Christmas???

    Or falling even lower?

>    I know, I know, I'm an awful cynic!  

    Were you one of those who were predicting $4 a gallon by Labor
Day?
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 02:18 GMT
>      Were you one of those who were predicting $4 a gallon by Labor
> Day?
> --

    No, I was predicting $3 to $3.25 for 87 octane and that was pretty
close. $3.10 at the BP station down on the road on July 28. After that
it began to drop.

                           Bill Shuey
Rufus - 02 Oct 2006 06:52 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>                             Bill Shuey

Where?...Apollo predicts:

No - in CA it will not get below $2/gal by Christmas.  And I doubt it
will get back up to $3/gal before next spring/summer.

Signature

     - Rufus

Mad-Modeller - 02 Oct 2006 07:11 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>                                                         Bill Shuey

I expect it to go back up after the elections just because I do not
trust our government.  I rank the current group way less trustworthy
than Joe Isuzu.

Bill Banaszak
Al Superczynski - 02 Oct 2006 07:14 GMT
>I expect it to go back up after the elections just because I do not
>trust our government.

    Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Mad-Modeller - 02 Oct 2006 07:40 GMT
> >I expect it to go back up after the elections just because I do not
> >trust our government.
>
>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
> --
> Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

I just said I expect it.  I didn't say I knew how.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Al Superczynski - 02 Oct 2006 08:30 GMT
>> >I expect it to go back up after the elections just because I do not
>> >trust our government.
>>
>>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?

>I just said I expect it.  I didn't say I knew how.

    Indeed...
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 02 Oct 2006 15:23 GMT
> >I expect it to go back up after the elections just because I do not
> >trust our government.
>
>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
> --

Perhaps like this?
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b41ed95e-5009-11db-9d85-0000779e2340.html

"In a claim that could fuel conspiracy theories about the recent oil
price decline - in an interview to be broadcast on CBS on Sunday -
Mr Woodward described a conversation between Prince Bandar bin Sultan
and Mr Bush in which the former Saudi ambassador said he could ease oil
prices ahead of the elections.

"They could go down very quickly. That's the Saudi pledge.
Certainly over the summer, or as we get closer to the election, they
could increase production several million barrels a day," Mr Woodward
said."

Martin
Al Superczynski - 04 Oct 2006 23:20 GMT
>>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
>> --
>
>Perhaps like this?
>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b41ed95e-5009-11db-9d85-0000779e2340.html

    Um, that would be the _Saudis_ manipulating the price of oil,
wouldn't it?
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 05 Oct 2006 17:07 GMT
Um, and they would apparently be doing it
_on_behalf_of_the_US_Government, wouldn't they?

Martin

> >>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
> >> --
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>      Um, that would be the _Saudis_ manipulating the price of oil,
> wouldn't it?
Al Superczynski - 06 Oct 2006 03:56 GMT
>...they would apparently be doing it
>_on_behalf_of_the_US_Government, wouldn't they?

    The Saudi government, like any other, acts in its own
self-interest.  International relationships are rarely based on
altruism.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 06 Oct 2006 15:30 GMT
> >...they would apparently be doing it
> >_on_behalf_of_the_US_Government, wouldn't they?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

Going back to the original argument and avoiding slipping on any
littered red herrings, your philosophical consideration doesn't change
the fact that at least according to the quoted account the Saudis would
do the US government's bidding with respect to the price of oil, which
effectively would mean said US government has a hand in influencing
said price. How and why that is so is largely irrelevant in this
context.

Martin
Al Superczynski - 11 Oct 2006 08:30 GMT
>...your philosophical consideration doesn't change
>the fact that at least according to the quoted account the Saudis would
>do the US government's bidding with respect to the price of oil, which
>effectively would mean said US government has a hand in influencing
>said price.

    Influence is not the same thing as control.  Look it up.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 11 Oct 2006 13:34 GMT
The difference between the two is merely a matter of degree, but not of
principle.

> >...your philosophical consideration doesn't change
> >the fact that at least according to the quoted account the Saudis would
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>      Influence is not the same thing as control.  Look it up.
> --
Al Superczynski - 12 Oct 2006 02:54 GMT
>> >...your philosophical consideration doesn't change
>> >the fact that at least according to the quoted account the Saudis would
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>      Influence is not the same thing as control.  Look it up.

>The difference between the two is merely a matter of degree, but not of
>principle.

    Again, look it up...

   
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 12 Oct 2006 14:28 GMT
Don't have to - using logic is more than enough in this case :-).

But to humor you:

Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Inc.,
Springfield, Massachusetts, 1987:

"Control: 2 a: to exercise restraining or directing influence over"

Hmmmm, now where did I see that word 'influence' before...

By the way, have you ever looked it up yourself, or are you just
another one of those people who never follow their own advice :-)?

Martin

> >> >...your philosophical consideration doesn't change
> >> >the fact that at least according to the quoted account the Saudis would
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>      Again, look it up...
Al Superczynski - 13 Oct 2006 03:20 GMT
>...using logic is more than enough in this case...

    You really ought to give it a try some time, then...
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

100450.3563@compuserve.com - 13 Oct 2006 15:03 GMT
I actually did, and the result was in full accordance with the
dictionary :-).

> >...using logic is more than enough in this case...
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
> and the critics will flame you every time."
Bill Woodier - 13 Oct 2006 15:10 GMT
Who is this guy arguing with you about what the definition of "is" is, Al?
Signature

Cheers:  Bill Woodier
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.
I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it.
     My Home Page:  http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--

>I actually did, and the result was in full accordance with the
> dictionary :-).
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
>> and the critics will flame you every time."
Stephen Tontoni - 14 Oct 2006 02:34 GMT
> Who is this guy arguing with you about what the definition of "is" is, Al?

Bill they're just feeding off each others' animosity. It ceased to be an
argument some time ago.

--- Stephen
Al Superczynski - 14 Oct 2006 04:42 GMT
>...they're just feeding off each others' animosity.

    I don't feel any animosity towards him/her.  I just think s/he's
wrong, that's all.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

maiesm72@netscape.com - 14 Oct 2006 21:49 GMT
Paid $2.35.9 per gallon yesterday in Marin County. It's down another
two cents today.

Tom

> >...they're just feeding off each others' animosity.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
> and the critics will flame you every time."
Ed Pirrero - 14 Oct 2006 23:34 GMT
> Paid $2.35.9 per gallon yesterday in Marin County. It's down another
> two cents today.

Damn you.  $2.599/gal here.

But down from $3.199 a month ago.  And of course, I filled up two cars
just before the price went down.

D'OH!

I'll have to sell my Badger 250 to pay for one of those tanks.

Anyone?  It's got a wood case and everything - three needle sizes....

E.P.
Carl Dershem - 15 Oct 2006 02:16 GMT
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote in news:1160865245.887334.153520
@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

>> Paid $2.35.9 per gallon yesterday in Marin County. It's down another
>> two cents today.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> D'OH!

In the past month or two it's gone from (on average, at the station down at
the corner) $3.37.9 to $2.52.9 a gallon.

And I've seen it as high as $2.68.9 and as low as $2.32.9.  Guess which
station I visit?

cd
Signature

The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
Grey.

AM - 15 Oct 2006 11:49 GMT
>>Paid $2.35.9 per gallon yesterday in Marin County. It's down another
>>two cents today.

Well it's right around $2.05 @ gallon here now :)

Signature

AM

http://sctuser.home.comcast.net

CentOS 4.3  KDE 3.3

Bill Woodier - 15 Oct 2006 16:44 GMT
$1.98 here in Bristow VA but I save another $0.06 per gallon with a Safeway
card.
Signature

Cheers:  Bill Woodier
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been
granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.
I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it.
     My Home Page:  http://www.bill-woodier.com/home.htm
--

>> Paid $2.35.9 per gallon yesterday in Marin County. It's down another
>> two cents today.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> E.P.
Mad-Modeller - 15 Oct 2006 04:52 GMT
Since we're bragging about prices, I filled the Mustang the other day
with $2.10/gal. gas.  I was shocked to get change back from my $10 bill.
I can't recall the last time I got change.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
WmB - 15 Oct 2006 04:58 GMT
> Since we're bragging about prices, I filled the Mustang the other day
> with $2.10/gal. gas.  I was shocked to get change back from my $10 bill.
> I can't recall the last time I got change.
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

Your Mustang has less than  a 4 3/4 gallon tank?

WmB
Mad-Modeller - 15 Oct 2006 06:33 GMT
> > Since we're bragging about prices, I filled the Mustang the other day
> > with $2.10/gal. gas.  I was shocked to get change back from my $10 bill.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> WmB

Geez, I hope not.  No, I've been topping it off each week, or as close
as $10 will get me to the top.  Yes, that's what my budget allows for
gas each week.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 15 Oct 2006 15:25 GMT
>> > Since we're bragging about prices, I filled the Mustang the other day
>> > with $2.10/gal. gas.  I was shocked to get change back from my $10 bill.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

rich kid!
e - 15 Oct 2006 05:11 GMT
>Since we're bragging about prices, I filled the Mustang the other day
>with $2.10/gal. gas.  I was shocked to get change back from my $10 bill.
>I can't recall the last time I got change.
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

here in the people's republic, i got 3/4 of a tank in the
supra. i almost sh.t. i could fill the van with diesel for
$50!
Al Superczynski - 15 Oct 2006 06:42 GMT
>Since we're bragging about prices...

    With my Kroger Plus card discount I can get gas for less than $2
a gallon now.    :)
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Al Superczynski - 14 Oct 2006 04:40 GMT
>Who is this guy arguing with you about what the definition of "is" is, Al?

    I dunno but I don't feel like arguing semantics with him/her any
more.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

The Old Man - 05 Oct 2006 17:20 GMT
>      Um, that would be the _Saudis_ manipulating the price of oil,
> wouldn't it?

Exactly, OPEC has been price gouging since 1970.
When thier oil runs out, they can start exporting kitty-litter and
settle into a life like their so-called prophet would like. Back to the
AD 700s.
Al Superczynski - 06 Oct 2006 03:53 GMT
>When thier oil runs out, they can start exporting kitty-litter...

    My cats insist on high-quality litter...
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 02:25 GMT
>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
> --

    I don't think it is as much the world oil market as the oil companies
simply charging what they think the market will bear. I travel
consistently between Baltimore and Winchester, VA, and the price of a
gallon of regular is consistently $.30 to $.35 a gallon cheaper down in
Winchester. It can't be cheaper to ship gasoline down into the hills of
Western Virginia than right to a seaport like Baltimore.
    Second thing, The consistently obscene quarterly record profits being
posted by the oil companies. It ain't all the arabs doing by any means.

                        Bill Shuey
WmB - 03 Oct 2006 03:27 GMT
>>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
>> --
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Bill Shuey

Bear in mind you've got WV, VA, and MD state taxes to acct for in the
aforementioned scenario.
In NC, state law (possibly a Fed law) mandates that the Fed and state fuel
surcharges be printed on the pump.

To the original point - no, I will not be at all shocked to see gas prices
climb after the election. Do I read anything into it?  I sure do - autumn is
here and winter is just around the corner and fuel supplies will dip. ;-)

WmB
Gray Ghost - 03 Oct 2006 04:08 GMT
>>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
>> --
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>                               Bill Shuey

I'll bet that it's a lot cheaper to own and operate a gas station in
Winchester, VA than Baltimore, MD. Of course it's a lot more expensive in
the rest of the world. Is that a GW Bush conspiracy, too?

Obscene profits? Exactly how many gallons of gas do you think they sell? If
they have a fixed margin of 5%. Someone actually know the real numbers so as
to make the accusation seem plausible?

As to why the price went up, did anyone notice a little war in the Mideast,
that one of the chief exporters is trying to make nuclear weapons, that the
Islamofacists keep blowing up Iraq's facilities to keep the flow of oil from
that country at nil and that one of the major pipelines in Alaska was closed  
for major repair.

Oil prices are set by the brokers. Thet are notoriously squirrelly and tend
to react to world events.

Conspiracy? Yeah right along with the black UN helicopters and the Soviet
tanks being secretly brought in to the US for nefarious purposes.

Frank
maiesm72@netscape.com - 03 Oct 2006 19:32 GMT
Oddly enough, prices at the pump went into freefall withn days of the
BP pipeline closure in Alaska. That's a tough one to figure out.

Tom

> >>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
> >> --
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Frank
Al Superczynski - 04 Oct 2006 23:09 GMT
>>      Exactly how does the US government control the world oil market?
>> --
>
>    I don't think it is as much the world oil market as the oil companies
>simply charging what they think the market will bear.

    How is that different from how any other business sets its
prices?

>    Second thing, The consistently obscene quarterly record profits being
>posted by the oil companies.

    What's obscene about them?  Please be specific.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Chuck Ryan - 02 Oct 2006 09:39 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Bill Shuey

I don't know if you're a cynic, Bill. If it walks like a
duck....................
It won't make a difference on what the cattle do. They'll just keep chewing
the same cud.

--
Chuck Ryan
Springfield OH
Mechanical Menace - 02 Oct 2006 13:22 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>                                    Bill Shuey

Hi Bill,

Just come and visit us in the Netherlands,

A Liter of Super Unleaded just went to 1.48 Euro's.

That's 1.88 USD per liter

If I got it right there is 3.79 liters to the gallon.

That will bring us to USD 7.13 per Gallon.

Now that makes drivin' fun!!!!!!

Dennis
(who really, REALLY loves to drive around in his 4.0 litre Jeep)
Peter W. - 03 Oct 2006 05:29 GMT
> Hi Bill,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Dennis
> (who really, REALLY loves to drive around in his 4.0 litre Jeep)

Dennis,
if you asked most Americans, they would tell you that they don't give a
rat's a.s how much the pertol costs in Europe.

They want theirs CHEAP!  Like it always was.

When it was under $2.00 in US, it was still way more expensive in
Europe.  Besides, taxes account for a big chunk of the price in Europe.
The tax structure is different.

So comparing petrol prices in EU and US is not very productive.

And it doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to figure out that somebody is
getting rich (not the end user).

If you figure out the percentage of price increase of a barrel of oil
vs. a gallon of gasoline, price of gasoline/gal. has increased more
than the privce of a barrel of oil. It is not the service station
owners who are getting rich. It is the distributors and the petroleum
companies who are making a killin'.

Peteski
Hawkeye - 02 Oct 2006 15:19 GMT
Bill, Here in Wisconsin I don't think gasoline will venture below
$2/gal because our gas tax is probably too high to allow that.  I think
gas will steady at and average of about $2.59 a gallon for the rest of
the winter.  If the auto industry continues to decline, gasoline price
will be partially blamed, but the auto giants will wake up and realize
that they need to expedite the introduction of more efficient engines
and small diesel motors sooner.

Will Ford marry GM?  Ford to manage the light & medium duty truck
lines, GM to do only cars...and fewer models of them...think about that
rumor for moment.
Hawkeye
Ed Pirrero - 02 Oct 2006 16:13 GMT
> Bill, Here in Wisconsin I don't think gasoline will venture below
> $2/gal because our gas tax is probably too high to allow that.  I think
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that they need to expedite the introduction of more efficient engines
> and small diesel motors sooner.

When all their profit eggs are in the SUV basket, that's a choice
MANAGEMENT made.  Now folks aren't so hip to keeping up with the Jones'
at $120/fill-up.

Turbodiesel motors work very well in passenger autos, if the current
technology is used.

> Will Ford marry GM?  Ford to manage the light & medium duty truck
> lines, GM to do only cars...and fewer models of them...think about that
> rumor for moment.

Oh, great - two bloated, quality-challenged behemoths marry to produce
cars nobody wants.

America needs an automaker start-up.  LOL - anyone got $5billion as
venture capital?

As to the original question, I don't see much change - maybe a little
lower than now, but not back up until spring.  Doesn't matter to me -
my cars get decent fuel economy.

E.P.
William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT
> Will Ford marry GM?  Ford to manage the light & medium duty truck
> lines, GM to do only cars...and fewer models of them...

Nah!  That would make too much sense!

                Bill Shuey
WmB - 03 Oct 2006 03:27 GMT
>> Will Ford marry GM?  Ford to manage the light & medium duty truck
>> lines, GM to do only cars...and fewer models of them...
>
> Nah!  That would make too much sense!
>
> Bill Shuey

I think you'll see more cooperation between the two but the brand market is
probably going to be problematic in some respects of an all out
consolidation. For instance, the new style Ford Mustang is a good seller for
Ford from what I understand. Hard to imagine that one with a bowtie on the
hood.

If that day ever does comes to pass, I guarantee you I'll buy a Toyota!

WmB
Mad-Modeller - 03 Oct 2006 03:49 GMT
>  
> Will Ford marry GM?  Ford to manage the light & medium duty truck
> lines, GM to do only cars...and fewer models of them...think about that
> rumor for moment.

As a Ford owner I find that idea repugnant.  After that !@#$%^&*+~!
Sunbird and my few acquaintances since with GM vehicles I might have to
go VW or something.  Not that I care all that much for anything new on
the road except for the Mustang.
Notice how we don't see much of Col. Klink pushing DC on TV anymore?

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Ron Smith - 03 Oct 2006 17:06 GMT
> Notice how we don't see much of Col. Klink pushing DC on TV anymore?

Huh?
Mad-Modeller - 04 Oct 2006 03:16 GMT
> > Notice how we don't see much of Col. Klink pushing DC on TV anymore?
>
> Huh?

DC=Daimler Chrysler;  Col. Klink=Dr.Z  OK, so he doesn't wear a monocle.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Ron Smith - 04 Oct 2006 05:26 GMT
Actually he's still going like the Energizer Bunny down here for
football and primetime shows.

>>>Notice how we don't see much of Col. Klink pushing DC on TV anymore?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Mad-Modeller - 04 Oct 2006 06:07 GMT
> Actually he's still going like the Energizer Bunny down here for
> football and primetime shows.

Hmm, I haven't seen him for at least a month.  Of course, I don't watch
football and primetime, especially this year, isn't worth wasting much
time on.  
Friday night is an especial trash heap. I used to watch the comedies on
the WB but this CW thing has two hours of (expletives deleted)!

Bil Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Ron Smith - 04 Oct 2006 06:17 GMT
> Hmm, I haven't seen him for at least a month.  Of course, I don't watch
> football and primetime, especially this year, isn't worth wasting much
> time on.  
> Friday night is an especial trash heap. I used to watch the comedies on
> the WB but this CW thing has two hours of (expletives deleted)!

Well I watch the Redskins but that's it for sports unless Olympic hockey
is on. For the sake of peace I watch a couple primetime shows with the
wife......House, CSI, Scrubs, Law & Order. Other than that snippets of
news and Leno.

Do you know why there are no bookmarks in Congress?

They like their pages bent over!
WmB - 04 Oct 2006 07:15 GMT
>> Actually he's still going like the Energizer Bunny down here for
>> football and primetime shows.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bil Banaszak, MFE Sr.

Let me go on record to add my name to the list of anyone that thinks those
Dr Z ads are the lamest crap to come out of car country this side of Bill
Ford's safety concerns ads.

WmB
e - 02 Oct 2006 17:53 GMT
>Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>                                                        Bill Shuey

saw $1.99 in il. not in ca!
thelaws - 02 Oct 2006 19:42 GMT
Locust Grove, VA has regular for 1.74.

>>Hi Troops:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> saw $1.99 in il. not in ca!
William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 02:32 GMT
> Locust Grove, VA has regular for 1.74.

   As I noted in another post, I travel consistently between Baltimore
and Winchester, VA. A gallon of regular is consistently $.30 to $.35 a
gallon cheaper in Winchester than in Baltimore. A friend says it is the
lower Virginia taxes. Are your gasoline taxes really that much lower??
    I'll be down in Winchester this weekend for the North-South Skirmish
Association Nationals and I bet gas will be about $1.89 to $1.99 a
gallon for regular.

                        Bill Shuey
Mad-Modeller - 03 Oct 2006 03:54 GMT
> > Locust Grove, VA has regular for 1.74.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>                                                 Bill Shuey

Fill'er up whilst you're there!

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
AM - 03 Oct 2006 12:58 GMT
>     I'll be down in Winchester this weekend for the North-South Skirmish
> Association Nationals and I bet gas will be about $1.89 to $1.99 a
> gallon for regular.
>
>                         Bill Shuey

Are they having the live cannon shoot ??
If so......
I might just have to make it then :)

Signature

AM

http://sctuser.home.comcast.net

CentOS 4.3  KDE 3.3

William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 23:37 GMT
Cannon is Saturday afternoon. That said, the weather man is not
promising good weather.

                    Bill Shuey
                1st Maine Heavy Artillery, N-SSA

> >       I'll be down in Winchester this weekend for the North-South Skirmish
> > Association Nationals and I bet gas will be about $1.89 to $1.99 a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> CentOS 4.3  KDE 3.3
AM - 04 Oct 2006 03:47 GMT
> Cannon is Saturday afternoon. That said, the weather man is not
> promising good weather.
>
>                     Bill Shuey
>                 1st Maine Heavy Artillery, N-SSA

Ok.
It's killing my chances of taking a telescope
out as well.......

I can still use my EOTech tho :)

Signature

AM

http://sctuser.home.comcast.net

CentOS 4.3  KDE 3.3

Nigel Cheffers-Heard - 02 Oct 2006 17:59 GMT
If I may make a comment from Europe, you shouldn't worry about the
price, you should worry about what to do when it runs out; AND IT WILL.
Our grandchildren will be asking why we were so profligate, when we knew
it was a finite and irreplaceable resource.
Eh bien, as we say in England...
N
Mad-Modeller - 03 Oct 2006 03:54 GMT
> If I may make a comment from Europe, you shouldn't worry about the
> price, you should worry about what to do when it runs out; AND IT WILL.
> Our grandchildren will be asking why we were so profligate, when we knew
> it was a finite and irreplaceable resource.
> Eh bien, as we say in England...
> N

A most cogent statement.  We 'should' be investing in developing a new
source of power.  I just don't know if we are or if we're serious
enough.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
WmB - 03 Oct 2006 04:10 GMT
>> If I may make a comment from Europe, you shouldn't worry about the
>> price, you should worry about what to do when it runs out; AND IT WILL.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

I'm sure there was a time a century in arears when the planet elders were
concerned for the future generations' coal and iron supply - and before them
the planet elders were concerned for future generations' supply of wood.

Given what we know about the rate of techological advance (past and
present), there's a damn good chance petroleum based products will take
their place among other former primary natural resource.

I'm betting on sand and seawater becoming precious commodities in the
distant future - I of course wont be around to be proven either right or
wrong. ;-)

WmB
William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 23:39 GMT
> > If I may make a comment from Europe, you shouldn't worry about the
> > price, you should worry about what to do when it runs out; AND IT WILL.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

As a follow up to this point, it was announced last week that the
largest coal mine in Maryland is about to shut down, the vein has run
out! Portent of things to come??

                            Bill Shuey
Willshak - 03 Oct 2006 23:58 GMT
>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>                             Bill Shuey
>  

I keep seeing a TV commercial with a little girl that states there is
enough coal in the US ground to last hundreds of years.

Signature

Bill
in Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, delete the double zeroes after @

Nigel Cheffers-Heard - 04 Oct 2006 09:01 GMT
> I keep seeing a TV commercial with a little girl that states there is
> enough coal in the US ground to last hundreds of years.

TV Commercial? Ah, an unimpeachably independent source of information!

:)

Actually, there is a vast amount of coal underground here in UK, but
since Thatcher took her personal beef with the miners to the lengths of
closing the mines, it is now no longer economically viable to reopen
them. Result: lots of inaccessible coal. Great.

N
Al Superczynski - 04 Oct 2006 23:11 GMT
>...it was announced last week that the
>largest coal mine in Maryland is about to shut down, the vein has run
>out! Portent of things to come?

    "Experts estimate that the United States has about 265 billion
tons of coal reserves. If we continue to use coal at the same rate as
we do today, we will have enough coal to last 285 years. This vast
amount of coal makes the United States the world leader in known coal
reserves."

<http://lsa.colorado.edu/summarystreet/texts/coal.htm>
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Al Superczynski - 04 Oct 2006 23:17 GMT
>...you shouldn't worry about the
>price [of oil], you should worry about what to do when it runs out...

    Let the Arabs worry about that.  Other oil-producing countries
and the rest of the world will have moved on to something else by
then, and all they'll have left is lots of worthless sand.  With
nothing to show for the oil wealth they once had...
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

e - 04 Oct 2006 23:33 GMT
>>...you shouldn't worry about the
>>price [of oil], you should worry about what to do when it runs out...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>then, and all they'll have left is lots of worthless sand.  With
>nothing to show for the oil wealth they once had...
depends on the country looks like dubai has some enlightened
rulers. the world's playground is a good sustained economic
goal.
Mad-Modeller - 05 Oct 2006 07:48 GMT
> >...you shouldn't worry about the
> >price [of oil], you should worry about what to do when it runs out...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
> and the critics will flame you every time."

You know, that's a big part of the problem.  Aside from the oil they
have nothing.  I heard the other week that there's a bigger economy in
Finland than in all the Middle Eastern countries combined.  Maybe if
these people had something worth living for they wouldn't be so
attracted to death.  
Once again, I have no problem with their own deathwishes, I object
tremendously to their trying to spread it around to people who don't
give a rat's a.s for their mentally-constipated religion.

Bill Banaszak
Al Superczynski - 06 Oct 2006 03:57 GMT
>Maybe if these people had something worth living for they wouldn't be so
>attracted to death.  

    Indeed.  Well said.
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Carl Dershem - 03 Oct 2006 02:07 GMT
> Hi Troops:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> odds are of it getting back up to $3 a gallon by Christmas???
>      I know, I know, I'm an awful cynic!    :-)

1)  Maybe, depending on where you are.

2)  Dead certain.  On 8 November.

cd
Signature

The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
Grey.

William H. Shuey - 03 Oct 2006 02:33 GMT
> The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
> Grey.

You and Captain Picard!     :-)

                Bill Shuey
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.