Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

P-51D/GT-350(?) ad

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken D - 30 Nov 2006 04:22 GMT
I have a recollection of what I think may have been a series of ads or
set-up photos with aircraft and matched autos. The one I remember was
an immaculate P-51D posed with a Ford Mustang, possibly a Shelby GT350.
It might have been a Ford ad, a Shelby ad, or just some photographer's
idea of fun.  And there might have been others. Anyone remember
this/these, and know where they were published?  Or a way to see
online?  Now with the Trumpeter 1:24 P-51D  a diorama suggests itself .

Ken D. .
Bob B - 30 Nov 2006 04:53 GMT
I remember the ad - will do some digging & see if I still have it -
I remember it really looked good...

Signature

"There are no great men.
There are only great challenges
that ordinary men are forced by
circumstances to meet."

Admiral William "Bull" Halsey

www.bobscorner.com

>I have a recollection of what I think may have been a series of ads or
> set-up photos with aircraft and matched autos. The one I remember was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ken D. .
e - 30 Nov 2006 05:16 GMT
>I have a recollection of what I think may have been a series of ads or
>set-up photos with aircraft and matched autos. The one I remember was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Ken D. .

i remember the ad, unsure of the car.
Mad-Modeller - 30 Nov 2006 05:33 GMT
> >I have a recollection of what I think may have been a series of ads or
> >set-up photos with aircraft and matched autos. The one I remember was
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> i remember the ad, unsure of the car.

Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup....

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

former child who drooled over that ad......
Kevin M. Vernon - 30 Nov 2006 07:16 GMT
<snippage>

> Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup....
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
>
> former child who drooled over that ad......

Plus a Supermarine & Triumph combo.  I seem to recall seeing that ad, too.

-Kevin in Indy
e - 30 Nov 2006 15:44 GMT
><snippage>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy

tr5, wasn't it?
Mad-Modeller - 01 Dec 2006 04:06 GMT
> ><snippage>
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> tr5, wasn't it?

Spitfire, both of them.  Cool concept.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 01 Dec 2006 04:56 GMT
>> In article <12mt1amrdkrd26@corp.supernews.com>, "Kevin M. Vernon"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
right, but the triumph covered sevral model
numbers for their spits, i believe.
tr2 was the coolest.
C.R. Krieger - 01 Dec 2006 18:49 GMT
> >Spitfire, both of them.  Cool concept.
> >
> right, but the triumph covered sevral model
> numbers for their spits, i believe.
> tr2 was the coolest.

No; a Spitfire was a Spitfire.  The Triumph TRs were distinctly
different cars, from the TR-2 to the TR-7/8.  Some of them were
produced alongside the Spitfire, but the two only ever shared some
running gear parts and very minor trim items.  Not bodies.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
e - 01 Dec 2006 20:15 GMT
>> >Spitfire, both of them.  Cool concept.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>produced alongside the Spitfire, but the two only ever shared some
>running gear parts and very minor trim items.  Not bodies.
ok, now i get it. what were the tr's called?
Mad-Modeller - 02 Dec 2006 05:44 GMT
> >No; a Spitfire was a Spitfire.  The Triumph TRs were distinctly
> >different cars, from the TR-2 to the TR-7/8.  Some of them were
> >produced alongside the Spitfire, but the two only ever shared some
> >running gear parts and very minor trim items.  Not bodies.

> ok, now i get it. what were the tr's called?

I don't recall them ever having names.  AFAIK, they were just known by
their numbers.  I 'think' the TR4A was an improvement on the original
TR4.
Also, they put out a GT6 which was, from the outside, a Spitfire with a
fastback coupe roof.  I know little about the innards.  There was a
1/25th GT6 kit available from Pyro, and maybe Lindberg too.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 02 Dec 2006 15:13 GMT
>> In article <1164998984.159309.91120@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "C.R.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

i do know that to keep one running, you pull the electrics
out and replace with a different brand....any different
brand.
lucas electric, the prince of darkness!
my friend had a tr3 bug eye, (i think it was a 3) and we
went nuts trying to keep it running but there were always
problems with something electric until we pulled every piece
if wire, socket and connector and replace with i think,
delco.
my tr6r bike has a boyer-bransden electronic ignition and
much higher powered 12v coils from a 'vette.
good, hot spark all the time, plus a rectifyer to run the
lights off the battery.
Mad-Modeller - 03 Dec 2006 02:39 GMT
I've heard a lot of that but my Austin America never had any troubles
with the electrics.  The motor/transmission was the bugaboo with that
one.  It's the only car I ever owned that I had to fill up the oil and
check the gas. ;)

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 03 Dec 2006 02:58 GMT
>I've heard a lot of that but my Austin America never had any troubles
>with the electrics.  The motor/transmission was the bugaboo with that
>one.  It's the only car I ever owned that I had to fill up the oil and
>check the gas. ;)
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
you sure it was lucas? there were other brit makers.
Mad-Modeller - 03 Dec 2006 04:54 GMT
> >I've heard a lot of that but my Austin America never had any troubles
> >with the electrics.  The motor/transmission was the bugaboo with that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> >Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
> you sure it was lucas? there were other brit makers.

30 years on I could be wrong.  It was wrecked so I'm not likely to be
able to ask the new owner either.  I have no idea what he hit but it
must have been tough as those things had thick skins.  'Twas a lovely
little car on the whole.  Shame about the drivetrain.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
C.R. Krieger - 04 Dec 2006 20:56 GMT
> my friend had a tr3 bug eye, (i think it was a 3)

No; once again another model.  In fact, another *brand*.  The 'bug-eye'
('frog-eye' to UK correspondents) was an *Austin-Healey Sprite*, which
later morphed with the same body/chassis, but a different front end,
into the MG Midget.

You're not really 'up' on old English sports cars, are you?
--
C.R. Krieger
Been there; done that.
e - 04 Dec 2006 21:44 GMT
>> my friend had a tr3 bug eye, (i think it was a 3)
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>You're not really 'up' on old English sports cars, are you?

no, just the bikes.
but i would swear there was a truimph with sperate lights
that sat on top of the fenders. that's what i meant by bug
eyed.
we had a four door healy when i was a kid. don't know the
model but it had idiot stick turn signals on the door
pillars. it was drafty and slow.
Bill Shatzer - 05 Dec 2006 01:13 GMT
>>>my friend had a tr3 bug eye, (i think it was a 3)

>>No; once again another model.  In fact, another *brand*.  The 'bug-eye'
>>('frog-eye' to UK correspondents) was an *Austin-Healey Sprite*, which
>>later morphed with the same body/chassis, but a different front end,
>>into the MG Midget.

>>You're not really 'up' on old English sports cars, are you?

> no, just the bikes.
> but i would swear there was a truimph with sperate lights
> that sat on top of the fenders. that's what i meant by bug
> eyed.

Indeed, all the early Triumphs - TR-2, TR-3, TR-3A - had a headlight
arrangement which was very similar to the early AH Sprites and could
properly be termed "bug-eyed".  Although, by convention the term is
usually reserved for the Sprites to distinguish them from the later,
more conventionally styled Sprites which were MG Midget clones.

When Triumph went to a more conventional arrangement, they changed the
model designation to TR-4, unlike the Sprites which kept the same name
when it changed body style. Thus "bug-eyed" was used to distinguish the
earlier Sprites from the later models of the same name while the
distinction was unnecessary with the Triumphs as ALL TR-3s and TR-3As
were "bug-eyed" and ALL TR-4s were not.

Cheers and all,
C.R. Krieger - 08 Dec 2006 20:37 GMT
> >>No; once again another model.  In fact, another *brand*.  The 'bug-eye'
> >>('frog-eye' to UK correspondents) was an *Austin-Healey Sprite*, which
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> usually reserved for the Sprites to distinguish them from the later,
> more conventionally styled Sprites which were MG Midget clones.

OK; I'll grant that the early TR-1/2/3 series had kinda' froggy eyes.
But there were very different cars from the Sprite in a couple of real
obvious ways.  The Sprite body had all the style of a bar of soap.
Straight, flat, slightly rounded sides.  And they were tiny in all
respects.  The TR-series were bigger and they had some styling touches
that the size of the Sprite probably couldn't handle.  Front and rear
fenders swooped up over the wheels and down toward the back both on the
bodysides (to about the middle of the rear fender) and on the rear
fenders, to low taillights.  The doors were also cut down from front to
rear to match the fender sweep angle.  They are unmistakeable from the
side, especially compared to a Sprite.  Hope that helps.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that.)
Stephen Bierce - 01 Dec 2006 19:11 GMT
><snippage>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy

How about a 1978 Ford Thunderbird with a Nieuport 28?

Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922
{Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
Ken D - 01 Dec 2006 19:30 GMT
I do remember seeing the Spitfire/Spitfire photo.  Very nice, that
would make another dio I'd enjoy.  But is there a good Triumph Spitfire
model in any scale?

Ken

> ><snippage>
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922
> {Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
Bill Shatzer - 01 Dec 2006 22:31 GMT
> I do remember seeing the Spitfire/Spitfire photo.  Very nice, that
> would make another dio I'd enjoy.  But is there a good Triumph Spitfire
> model in any scale?

Aurora did a 1963 Triumph Spitfire in 1/32 - as well as a lot of other
British "sporty cars" of that era - TR 3, MG TD etc.

I've no idea how "good" they might have been.

Peace and justice,
Mad-Modeller - 02 Dec 2006 05:49 GMT
> > I do remember seeing the Spitfire/Spitfire photo.  Very nice, that
> > would make another dio I'd enjoy.  But is there a good Triumph Spitfire
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Peace and justice,

Pretty basic, as I recall.  I built a Ferarri once and it wasn't an AMT
kit by any stretch.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Willshak - 01 Dec 2006 21:26 GMT
>> <snippage>
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> {Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
>  

How about an F-86 Saber Jet with any US car from 1957?

Signature

Bill
in Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, delete the double zeroes after @

e - 01 Dec 2006 22:48 GMT
>>> <snippage>
>>>    
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>How about an F-86 Saber Jet with any US car from 1957?

57 chebby fer sure.
e - 01 Dec 2006 22:47 GMT
>><snippage>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922
>{Sig Quotes Removed on Request}

an he 162 and a woody?
me 163 and an rx7?
hey, this could get silly
post your funniest pick.
Al Superczynski - 30 Nov 2006 09:54 GMT
>Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup...

    Or a 1/24 F-102A to go with the various XKE kits out there. Not
referring to an ad of course, but the stunning Aurora box art.  

    Come to think of it, Renwal did an XKE in 1/48.  Hmmm.....
Signature

Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

My "From" address is munged - use 'modeleral (at) swbell (dot) net' to respond via email.

Check out my want lists and eBay listings at "Al's Place":
http://home.swbell.net/arfunguy/index.html
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to,
and the critics will flame you every time."

Mad-Modeller - 01 Dec 2006 04:11 GMT
> >Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> Al Superczynski, MFE, IPMS/USA #3795, continuous since 1968

Used to park my Pyro 1/32 Mercedes-Benz SSK around a Revell 1/32     Bf
109G.  

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
e - 01 Dec 2006 04:57 GMT
>> >Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

that the 6 wheel? did mussolini' grandaughter get his?
Kevin M. Vernon - 01 Dec 2006 16:57 GMT
>>> >Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> that the 6 wheel? did mussolini' grandaughter get his?

Nope - sorry, e.

The Mercedes SSK was a sportscar.  Designed by Herr Doktor Porsche, no less.
The G35 was the 6 wheeler.  And somehow, I really doubt if Alessandra ever
even saw Benito's old one.

Oh, and Triumph never used the "Tr" designation on Spitfires.  The Tr-2,
Tr-3, Tr-4, Tr-5(Tr-250 in the States) Tr-6, Tr-7 & Tr-8 were a couple of
different lines of sportscars.....the Spitfire never had a "Tr" number, that
I'm aware of.  The hardtop/fastback version was known as the GT-6, however.

-Kevin in Indy
e - 01 Dec 2006 20:08 GMT
>>>> >Now all we need is a 1/24th F-86D and all the '56 Chrysler lineup...
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy

she has a long standing lawsuit with the gov. she alleges
that hitler gave it to grandpa and not the state and she
should have it. they do take care of it.
i have often heard of american imported in triumph cars as
various tr. lots of confusion with the bikes as tere are
many tr there. i have a tr6r. sinfle carb 650cc engine.
most people bought the bonneville which had 2 carbs. there
was only a 4 hp difference and the single is MUCH easier to
keep tuned and happy. and now they are the rarer and command
typically 3,000 bucks more for a concourse resto than the
bonnie.
i have a bonnie also, in boxes. once i got the one carb
running, my motivation for the bonnie slowed. i may just
sell it.
there is much confusion about triumph models and numbers.
i do have a book that sort of explains, but it to is fuzzy.
alessandra was quite a looker in the 80's. saw her almost
naked in some political publication. didn't she run for
office? there is just one grandaughter, yes?
Kevin M. Vernon - 02 Dec 2006 03:48 GMT
> she has a long standing lawsuit with the gov. she alleges
> that hitler gave it to grandpa and not the state and she
> should have it. they do take care of it.

I was not aware of that.  I just figured it didn't exist, anymore.

> alessandra was quite a looker in the 80's. saw her almost
> naked in some political publication. didn't she run for
> office? there is just one grandaughter, yes?

I have some poor quality, low-res pics that are not "almost" naked, they are
the "Full Monty" as it were.  Scrounged 'em off some newsgroup must be 10
years ago or something. No, I'm not gonna post 'em here...besides,
quality-wise they aren't worth posting.

Ran for & gained office.  She WAS a member of Italian Parliament for some
time.  As a member of her Dear Departed Grandfather's Party, no less.  No
idea about any other relatives.  Makes ya think, though.  Would Wolf Hess
run for a seat in the Bundestag?  Of course, he hardly knew his father.  How
many years was Manfred Rommel the Mayor of Stuttgart?

-Kevin in Indy.
e - 02 Dec 2006 05:22 GMT
>> she has a long standing lawsuit with the gov. she alleges
>> that hitler gave it to grandpa and not the state and she
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy.

yeah, she was a looker. i don't need her bare butt pics,
anyway. she has a good claim, the gov is just being pissy
because of who's it was. they do keep it up and it is
gorgeous. i've heard it valued at 5-8 million because of the
provenance. they are amazing, blower and all. i believe they
can go up to 130 mph.
fortunately it's not alway like father like son. manfred's a
good guy. old school german, not nazi.
what about himmlers oldest boy?
Kevin M. Vernon - 02 Dec 2006 11:33 GMT
> fortunately it's not alway like father like son. manfred's a
> good guy. old school german, not nazi.
> what about himmlers oldest boy?

Yeah, Manfred's a good one - just like his Papa.  Himmler's kids?  Cyanide
in the bunker, by Mamma's own hand.  All 6 of 'em. They went with the rest
of the Loonies.

-Kevin in Indy
e - 02 Dec 2006 15:08 GMT
>> fortunately it's not alway like father like son. manfred's a
>> good guy. old school german, not nazi.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy

he had more. oldest boy was in the army and not the bunker.
so says mr keegan, anyway.
Kevin M. Vernon - 03 Dec 2006 03:20 GMT
>>> fortunately it's not alway like father like son. manfred's a
>>> good guy. old school german, not nazi.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> he had more. oldest boy was in the army and not the bunker.
> so says mr keegan, anyway.

Ah - my bad.  I was thinking Goebbels, not Himmler.  Every now & then I get
those 2 swapped.  Sheesh.

-Kevin in Indy
e - 03 Dec 2006 03:55 GMT
>>>> fortunately it's not alway like father like son. manfred's a
>>>> good guy. old school german, not nazi.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>-Kevin in Indy

yeah, one super slimey nazi scumbag is a lot like another super slimey nazi scumbag
Kos - 30 Nov 2006 14:41 GMT
> I have a recollection of what I think may have been a series of ads or
> set-up photos with aircraft and matched autos. The one I remember was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ken D. .

It may have been either a poster or a calendar for a Roush Mustang.  We
had a photo shoot on our ramp about three or four years ago with 3 of
his Roush Mustangs, and either one or both of his P-51D Mustangs.

Kos
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.