Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Polar Lights 1/350 Star Trek NCC-1701A Enterprise engine Q

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frank - 14 Dec 2006 18:21 GMT
I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
with ST now on TVLand, but I want to build the Enterprise from the
series. The best I can tell, the 1701 has the cylindrical engine pods &
the 1701A has the squred ones. I've seen some reviews on the kit but
they haven't said anyting about the engines. So, is the 1701 the one in
the series & does the PL kit have the cylindrical engine pods? TIA
RobG - 14 Dec 2006 20:39 GMT
> I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
> the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> they haven't said anyting about the engines. So, is the 1701 the one in
> the series & does the PL kit have the cylindrical engine pods? TIA

Originally, the NCC-1701 Enterprise in the first three movies was the
one with the squared engine nacelles. It wasn't until the end of Star
Trek 4: The Voyage Home, that another vessel with squared engine
nacelles was re-flagged and became the 1701-A Enterprise.

That's why they say the parts are in the kit to build the Star Trek
movie (1, 2, 3) NCC-1701 Enterprise. They are not The Original Series
(TOS) NCC-1701 Enterprise.
Daniel - 14 Dec 2006 23:05 GMT
>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
> the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> they haven't said anyting about the engines. So, is the 1701 the one in
> the series & does the PL kit have the cylindrical engine pods? TIA

No. This kit represents the Enterprise as seen in the movies: 1701
(I-III) and 1701A (IV-VI). Aside from the overall general shape, the
movie Enterprise has almost nothing in common with the TV version.
William L. Powell - 15 Dec 2006 01:24 GMT
Hey, there is a vac form kit out on the TOS model. Rebellion Modules has
come out with 3 sections of the model. I seen it on
http://www.starshipmodeler.com/news.cfm

Check it out. You might be suprised how much it is.

Signature

WILLIAM L. POWELL

>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
>> the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and 1701A (IV-VI). Aside from the overall general shape, the movie
> Enterprise has almost nothing in common with the TV version.
Gondor - 15 Dec 2006 13:35 GMT
>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
>> the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and 1701A (IV-VI). Aside from the overall general shape, the movie
> Enterprise has almost nothing in common with the TV version.

The story was that at the end if its Five Year Mission, which was in effect
the first TV series, the Enterprise was refitted with newer engines,
apparently at the suggestion of an engineering officer named Scott, then
they upgraded the engineering hull and the saucer section which resulted in
the film Enterprise.
I hope this helps clear things up for you Daniel.

Regards

Gondor
frank - 15 Dec 2006 13:42 GMT
I see now, thanks. Reckon I'll stick with the AMT kit.

> >>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
> >> the 1701. Now, not being a diehard Trek fan, but my interest is renewed
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Gondor
RobG - 15 Dec 2006 19:24 GMT
>     I see now, thanks. Reckon I'll stick with the AMT kit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> > Gondor- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Frank, if you really want a nice, but inexpensive TOS Enterprise, put
down the AMT kit and reach for the Polar Lights Enterprise. It is an
outstanding kit that is marginally smaller than the AMT kit. It came
out around 2003 and includes bits and pieces to make the first pilot TV
series version, the second pilot TV series version and the regular TV
series version. A much superior kit and under $15.
http://www.starshipmodeler.com/trek/pl_tos.htm

The old AMT/Ertl kit is 1/650 scale and the PL kit is 1/1000. It
includes markings for 5 different ships and the Mirror Universe
Enterprise. The PL kit also has a Klingon Battle Cruiser made in the
same scale as well as the NX-01 Enterprise from the last series.
Wayne C. Morris - 16 Dec 2006 23:11 GMT
>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
> the 1701. [...]  So, is the 1701 the one in
> the series & does the PL kit have the cylindrical engine pods? TIA

No, it's just the movie Enterprise.  The shapes of the TV Enterprise and
movie Enterprise are too different to allow both to be built from one kit.

In the first movie, the Enterprise was *supposedly* the same ship as in the
TV series, but had undergone a massive refit that made it look completely
different, including the non-cylindrical engine nacelles.  Since it was
allegedly the same ship, it had the same number: NCC-1701.  It was
destroyed in the 3rd movie, so in the 4th movie they took another ship,
renamed it Enterprise, and gave it the number NCC-1701A.

At some point in the movies (might have been ST4, but I'm not sure), they
made some minor changes to the ship.  The 1/350 NCC-1701A kit includes
parts to build it as either the original ST-TMP version or the later
version.
Carl Dershem - 17 Dec 2006 04:56 GMT
>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
>> the 1701. [...]  So, is the 1701 the one in
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> includes parts to build it as either the original ST-TMP version or
> the later version.

And the design that was to be used to the second series (that was never
made, but planned in the 1970's) had a ship that was halfway between the
original design and the movie design.  That woud an interesting build.  :)

cd
(For further detail, a book was published about the show - "STar Trek -
Phase II, the lost series" was published by POcket Books, and written by
Gar and Judy Reeves-Stevens)
Signature

The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
Grey.

teem - 17 Dec 2006 22:03 GMT
>>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also build
>>> the 1701. [...]  So, is the 1701 the one in
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>Phase II, the lost series" was published by POcket Books, and written by
>Gar and Judy Reeves-Stevens)
Right,That ''series'' was under construction with interiors,& maybe
that's where the ships' design was wallowing in the mire.What if that
series went though?,couple less ST movies,eh?.
Carl Dershem - 17 Dec 2006 23:08 GMT
>>>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also
>>>>     build
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> that's where the ships' design was wallowing in the mire.What if that
> series went though?,couple less ST movies,eh?.

Hard to tell.  The interiors were very similar to what ended up in the
first (really bad) movie, but the costumes were from TOS.  But the shape
of the ship was a blend (except for the one proof of concept model) of
the two versions.

I have a feeling that if the series had proceeded (they started with the
series idea, and gradually blended to full feature production), the
movies would have been delayed at best, adn perhaps never made at all.  
It all depends on what kind of ratings it got.

cd
Signature

The difference between immorality and immortality is "T".  I like Earl
Grey.

teem - 19 Dec 2006 02:22 GMT
>>>>>     I see the 1/350 NCC-1701A kit claims to have parts to also
>>>>>     build
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
>cd
The ''easy'' explaination was Star Wars.Nimoy didnt want a thing to do
with that series,Persis,however was being 'fitted' for her role.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.