> In museum specimens, I wonder how much of the 'crudeness' - if you
> mean ill-fitting panels, lumps and bumps - is due to poor building and
> how much to poor maintenance. A/cs in service, even when the paintwork
> is in a state, have a smoother appeareance to my untrained eye.
I wondered that myself. It's obvious on some that I've seen that
maintenance isn't high on the list.
> One thing that I always found odd was the sheer number of air scoops
> protruding from the intake/engine/avionics on these planes. On Western
> aircrafts, these are usually of the recessed type - the ones looking
> like half-funnels - and so they are on the L-39, but the Russians
> apparently never used this configuration. One wonders whether
> engineering has its fads too...
One of the most memorable features of the K-P MiG-19 is the rash of
small scoops to install around the tail.
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Jules - 08 Jun 2007 13:27 GMT
> > In museum specimens, I wonder how much of the 'crudeness' - if you
> > mean ill-fitting panels, lumps and bumps - is due to poor building and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I wondered that myself. It's obvious on some that I've seen that
> maintenance isn't high on the list.
Nothing being nex to a real Mig to get a good look, the Q symbol on many DDR
aircraft for quality....
> > One thing that I always found odd was the sheer number of air scoops
> > protruding from the intake/engine/avionics on these planes. On Western
> > aircrafts, these are usually of the recessed type - the ones looking
> > like half-funnels - and so they are on the L-39, but the Russians
> > apparently never used this configuration. One wonders whether
> > engineering has its fads too...
Walked around real L-39's it didnt float my boat like a Mig21 or SU-22
did..
> One of the most memorable features of the K-P MiG-19 is the rash of
> small scoops to install around the tail.
yup, and you people, if you buy one of my DDR and Polish Aircraft and helo
cd's you will notice the size and non flush fitting of the rivets, panel
lines etc etc :-)
£5 post free UK, £7 world wide, paypal take for overseas sending
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain.invalid - 08 Jun 2007 17:15 GMT
>> > In museum specimens, I wonder how much of the 'crudeness' - if you
>> > mean ill-fitting panels, lumps and bumps - is due to poor building and
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
engineers do have fads. like archtects and musicians.
remember the 60's when new buildings all had that
sh.t-a-brick look to then? or psychedelic music?
Mad-Modeller - 09 Jun 2007 06:06 GMT
someone plunked out:
> engineers do have fads. like archtects and musicians.
> remember the 60's when new buildings all had that
> sh.t-a-brick look to then? or psychedelic music?
New buildings had psychedelic music? Can't recall that, but then I'm
here in the early 20th century. Georgian architecture was all the rage
here in the '60s and '70s. They even stripped all the art deco
decoration off a bank building downtown and gave it a faux Colonial
look. 5 storey buildings do NOT look right as Colonials.
The only art deco building left downtown is our 'skyscraper', the Greist
Building. It's a whopping 12 storeys and can be seen from most areas of
the countryside. Soon it'll be overshadowed by the convention
center/hotel that the powers have commanded to be built.
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain.invalid - 09 Jun 2007 06:06 GMT
>someone plunked out:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
you're here in the 20th century? pass that bong over here,
bill.
i was thinking of industrial and commercial buildings.