Heh, never saw it called a float plane. :)
On Jun 10, 4:39 pm, "Ray S. & Nayda Katzaman" <r...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> Heh, never saw it called a float plane. :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > Austin, TX
> > ===
===
Hey, why not, it's a plane and it floats, hence, float plane. On the other
hand flying boat, a bit hard to swallow, it is not a boat, and boats do not
fly, they sink - go figure.
Ray
Austin, TX
===
frank - 11 Jun 2007 23:24 GMT
Well, it's not exactly a 'float plane' nor a 'flying boat',
it's generally considered an amphibian or even a tri-phibian. I think
Schiffer has book on the HU-16, or maybe it's Ginter.
On Jun 11, 12:40 pm, "Ray S. & Nayda Katzaman" <r...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> > Heh, never saw it called a float plane. :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Austin, TX
> ===
> Heh, never saw it called a float plane. :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > Austin, TX
> > ===
===
Forgot to ask you, do you know where I can get some plans? Or pictures for
that matter (don't tell me "Google is my friend" because I have already been
there), pictures of the interior cabins.
Ray
Austin, TX
===