> > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dave
This works out nicely as I have two questions to expand the discussion
of late Stug III. 1) How many Axis countries used them. 2) Did they
all have zimmerit from the factory, even those going to Axis partners?
3) How is this pattern best modeled in 1/35 scale? 4) Is it plausible
to ,model the pattern on small scale kits?. Finally expanding the
original post in terms of modeling them, How many marking are out
there for Stug III variants from places such as Archer's transfers? I
supppose if one include generic unit markings and numbers every
operational area can be represented?
Nice to see this Stug III thread.
Big Al cherer
Dave - 22 Jun 2007 05:42 GMT
> > > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Big Al cherer
In response to Q.2 I first had to look up what Zimmerit was but I
found this link discussing factory application of it on tanks in late
1943.
http://www.panzerworld.net/zimmerit.html
It also has a nice pattern example. As far as applying it to a 1/35
scale model I wouldn't have a clue being a beginner modeler.
Dave - 22 Jun 2007 05:45 GMT
> > > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Big Al cherer
First I had to look up what Zimmerit was but I found a nice link that
talks about factory application of it to tanks in late 1943.
http://www.panzerworld.net/zimmerit.html
It also has a nice pattern sample. As far as the feasibility and
method of applying it to a 1/35 scale model I'm not sure as I'm still
a beginner.
Dave
Dave - 22 Jun 2007 18:09 GMT
> > > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Big Al cherer
I found some Zimmerit in a .pdf catalog from http://squadron.com/ It
is in the 17-32 pg file and on the last page top left
Dave
Dave - 22 Jun 2007 18:53 GMT
> > > > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > > > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Dave
Also just learned about the StuH 42 that was also used in the Battle
of Tali-Ihantala (June 25 to July 9, 1944). and how it is simply the
StuG III F/G with a different main gun and an after market part can be
found here http://www.internethobbies.com/jrr-43.html to accomplish
the look if anyone besides myself is looking for such details.
Dave
Gerald Owens - 23 Jun 2007 00:55 GMT
Not sure why you've fixated on one obscure battle in Finland. In any
event, the Tamiya kit already includes a 105 mm howitzer as an
alternate part. The conversion you showed would require the addition
of a bullet deflector for the front of the commander's cupola as well
as other 1944 features. Dragon also offers a full kit of the 105 mm
version with all late features in the box.
> > > > > The "G" model entered production in December, 1942, so the presence of
> > > > > any Gs at Stalingrad is unlikely. North Africa is more possible but only
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Dave
Mikko Pietilä - 02 Jul 2007 17:47 GMT
>Not sure why you've fixated on one obscure battle in Finland.
Hey! Watch out what you are saying!
The "obscure" battle of yours decided the fate of a whole nation for
the rest of the century! See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tali-Ihantala
Ok, I admit that the battle was not _that_ big in the Eastern Front
standards, 200 000 troops in all on both sides.
It is not a bad choice for a model, though. The Finnish StuGs are
pretty well documented (see e.g.
http://www.andreaslarka.net/assaultguns.html ) and the paint scheme is
quite different from any German more commonly seen on models.
Mikko
Dave - 05 Jul 2007 17:26 GMT
On Jul 2, 12:47 pm, Mikko Pietil?
<mikko.nospamm.piet...@saunalahti.nospamm.fi> wrote:
> >Not sure why you've fixated on one obscure battle in Finland.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mikko
Thanks for the link!