balsa wood model--glue?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
TheKeith - 12 Oct 2007 18:44 GMT Hey I just got the 1903 wright flyer balsa wood model. I never built a balsa wood model before and I keep reading everywhere that CA glue is the preferred. Can I use regular super glue or krazy glue, since I believe both are cyanoacrylate, or do I need some special formulation of CA. Any hekp would be appreciated--thanks.
willshak - 12 Oct 2007 19:02 GMT on 10/12/2007 1:44 PM TheKeith said the following:
> Hey I just got the 1903 wright flyer balsa wood model. I never built a > balsa wood model before and I keep reading everywhere that CA glue is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I would suspect that you would need the thicker CA glue. Me, I would just use regular carpenter's glue.
 Signature Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @
TheKeith - 12 Oct 2007 20:03 GMT > I would suspect that you would need the thicker CA glue. Me, I would > just use regular carpenter's glue. yeah I would definately use regular wood glue, liek titebond or something but, I read that the CA glues have a 12-second set time as opposed to the 30-minute set time with the wood glues, which means I'd need to use clamps most likely, correct?
willshak - 12 Oct 2007 20:59 GMT on 10/12/2007 3:03 PM TheKeith said the following:
>> I would suspect that you would need the thicker CA glue. Me, I would >> just use regular carpenter's glue. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > If you are in hurry to finish it fast, find a hobby store that stocks the heavier CA glue, sometimes called 'gap filling' CA. Otherwise, unless the joints are under stress, no clamping may be necessary. If you do need clamps, the spring clothespins work fine, or you can buy a set of small plastic clamps from Harbor Freight for a few dollars. I have this 22 piece set for $5. http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=8826 Even the smallest ones have a jaw opening of over 1"
 Signature Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @
PaPaPeng - 12 Oct 2007 21:56 GMT >on 10/12/2007 3:03 PM TheKeith said the following: >>> I would suspect that you would need the thicker CA glue. Me, I would [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=8826 >Even the smallest ones have a jaw opening of over 1" The Dollar Stores carry general purpose wood glue. This comes in a squeeze tube and is a clear thick liquid that dries like the old style balsa glue. The glue shrinks (pulls the balsa join together) but retains a modicum of flexibility. This is the best balsa glue as the balsa will flex in flight and the flexibility provides "give" while maintaining the integrity of the bond. Balsa is very absorbent and CA will just soak right into the wood grain leaving little on the surface to form a bond. CA is also very brittle and the surface balsa flexing may break the bond. Plus I hate working with CA glues. They are evil and seem to be on autoseek mode whenever there is any exposed skin.
TheKeith - 12 Oct 2007 22:07 GMT > The Dollar Stores carry general purpose wood glue. This comes in a > squeeze tube and is a clear thick liquid that dries like the old style [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > may break the bond. Plus I hate working with CA glues. They are evil > and seem to be on autoseek mode whenever there is any exposed skin. lol. ok I'll look for some of this stuff, otherwise I'll take Bill's advice and just use titebond with clothespins for clamps. Thanks guys.
mike - 13 Oct 2007 11:41 GMT > > The Dollar Stores carry general purpose wood glue. This comes in a > > squeeze tube and is a clear thick liquid that dries like the old style [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > lol. ok I'll look for some of this stuff, otherwise I'll take Bill's > advice and just use titebond with clothespins for clamps. Thanks guys. The above solvent glue is more rubbery than the hobby type, named Ambroid or Sigment, for your 'old school' method, esp if you don't mind the smell.
If you want to sand the joints, avoid overuse of CA on balsa, the Sigment or Titebond sands far easier.
you can use the superglue to tack the bits together, then use the other glues. Note if this is a flying model, and you use the wet silkspan method for covering, titebond will soften
** mike **
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 13 Oct 2007 14:38 GMT > on 10/12/2007 1:44 PM TheKeith said the following: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > In Hamptonburgh, NY > To email, remove the double zeroes after @ Yes, use the GEL variety, the thicker, slower setting stuff. I also use white glue, which is cheaper. I use the white glue for assemblies that are going to be pinned down for awhile, CA when I need the quicker set. I also use the CA for areas that will be finished, because the white glue is harder to sand and paint.
Also, I have built these as shelf scale models, covering the metal covered areas with sheet styrene. I use CA for gluing the styrene to balsa.
nb - 13 Oct 2007 02:44 GMT Go to the hobby store and get some CA. The RC guys use it to build their airplanes. It dries very fast, no clamping required.
> Hey I just got the 1903 wright flyer balsa wood model. I never built a > balsa wood model before and I keep reading everywhere that CA glue is > the preferred. Can I use regular super glue or krazy glue, since I > believe both are cyanoacrylate, or do I need some special formulation > of CA. Any hekp would be appreciated--thanks. Boris Beizer - 13 Oct 2007 17:27 GMT > Go to the hobby store and get some CA. The RC guys use it to build their > airplanes. It dries very fast, no clamping required. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> believe both are cyanoacrylate, or do I need some special formulation >> of CA. Any hekp would be appreciated--thanks. If you're nostalgic and/or have a peverse amount of compulsive masochism, you could use traditional (e.g. 50 + years ago) acetate model cements such as Ambroid, or testors. >However, they are likely to be hard to find because they have been abused in the past .. the notorious "Glue sniffing" that provided a cheap but ultimately deadly high. As an old-time balsa wood flying model builder and a present day, wooden ship model builder, I can't imagine going back to the glues of last century when when infinitely superior products such products as CA glues are available .. you might as well go back a few centuries and use hide glue or fish glue as use Testor's. CA from several manufactureres are available in four grades, from very thin, medium thin, thick (gap filling) to gel(really thick. ). The thicker the formula the longer the setting time. Very thin sets in 15-30 second. Gel in 10-15 minutes. All of them can be accelerated by using an accelerator such a "Zip Kicker" The thin stuff, even without an accelerator gets hot. For balsa, especially soft balsa, the thin stuff socks into the wood an reinforces wit so that the material around the joint is much stronger than the raw wood. .The closer wood-to-wood fit, the stronger the joint. The main reason for using the thicker stuff is not for a stronger joint, but to provide various degrees of gap filling. CA glues are generally employed without clamping. CA glues are used by some modelers to provide a temporary "clamp" for use in conjunction with wood glues these CA glues are available at any good hobby shop that sells flying models or ship models Now as for using a modern wood glue, such as tight bond. These also come with different setting times.here, the slower setting (e.g. tight-bond III) . versions are stronger. Setting time is measured in hours (24-48) .The joint is generally stronger than the base wood. All are available at a good woodworking supplier. There is no reason to deal with the long setting and clamping times of wood glues in a flying model,. In the wooden ship model community, there is an ongoing discussion over the use of Wood glues (tight bond), versus CA glues. The question revolves around whether or not CA will last 100 years or more. We know that epoxy joints and epoxy gets weaker and brittle with age, the verdict isn't in for CA. Since balsa models are usually flying models, and since most don't survive the first attempted flight, the issue of lasting 100 years is moot. BTW-- violin makers use traditional hide or fish glue precisely because the are known to last 100 +years, an also because it is possible to safely undo an old glue joint.
Boris
gap filling
)_
Pat Flannery - 13 Oct 2007 20:34 GMT > As an old-time balsa wood flying model builder and a present day, wooden > ship model builder, I can't imagine going back to the glues of last century > when when infinitely superior products such products as CA glues are > available > CA made rigging a _lot_ easier. :-)
Pat
mike - 15 Oct 2007 15:21 GMT > As an old-time balsa wood flying model builder and a present day, wooden > ship model builder, I can't imagine going back to the glues of last century > when when infinitely superior products such products as CA glues are > available .. you might as well go back a few centuries and use hide glue or > fish glue as use Testor's. Testors never sanded as good as Ambroid or Sigment :)
Will agree that except in certain areas, protein glues are best left alone
One unmentioned advantage of the old type solvent glues, you are less likely to ever pickup a sensitivity to them, unlike CAs or Epoxy. Some folks just can't be near CA fumes after that point. I try to use them only for tacking. Been using them since the old 'Hot Stuff' CAs hit the market, and hope to keep using them, but use the titebond(and poly-u for foam-wood joints) for flying models.
Sensitivity is out there, waiting for some point where your body decides its had enough of whatever chemical, from tomorrow or when you're 90
** mike **
Boris Beizer - 15 Oct 2007 16:36 GMT > Will agree that except in certain areas, protein glues are best left > alone > > One unmentioned advantage of the old type solvent glues, you are less > likely to ever pickup a sensitivity to them, unlike CAs or Epoxy. I would think that the casein-based glues such as Elmer's and tight-bond would be less likely to trigger allergies, unless you have lactose intolerance. However the acetate-based glues can do nasty things to lungs, as many early glue sniffers learned.
> Some folks just can't be near CA fumes after that point. The big danger of CA is not allergies, but the fumes. They can coat your lungs and seriously compromise lung function. Thats a good reason for caution and an even better reason to use them in microscopic quantities with proper applicators.
> I try to use them only for tacking. I'vr tried that,; lot's of ship modeler's do it. But I've yet to get the hang of that trick.Somehow, here I haven't tacked is always where I want apply the tight-bond. And the two glues do not happily co-exist
> Sensitivity is out there, waiting for some point where your body > decides its had enough of whatever chemical, from tomorrow or when you're So that's what those nasty red spots were? I was hoping for syphilis.
Boris
Pat Flannery - 16 Oct 2007 05:01 GMT > The big danger of CA is not allergies, but the fumes. They can coat your > lungs and seriously compromise lung function. Thats a good reason for > caution and an even better reason to use them in microscopic quantities with > proper applicators. > > Cutting into dried CA with a Dremel carbide cut-off wheel will result in fumes that are the next best thing to a WW I gas attack. You will suddenly find out that your body is not going to let you inhale them, so you just run out of the area till you can breath.
>> I try to use them only for tacking. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > apply the tight-bond. And the two glues do not happily co-exist > One oddity of CA I've found is that when it's applied to styrene plastic under stress it will cause it to fracture.
> >> Sensitivity is out there, waiting for some point where your body [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > So that's what those nasty red spots were? I was hoping for syphilis. > My goofy CA story. Once long ago, I had a tube of Super Glue that was plugged. I didn't have a pin handy, but remembered I had replaced the pitot tube on my MiG-25 with a needle after it broke off. So I took the model and stuck the tub on the pitot tube. When I went to remove the tube it pulled the needle out of the plane's nose. So I took the tube and grabbed the needle with my teeth, and pulled back on the tube. The needle came out and most of the tube of CA shot into my mouth, gluing my lips to my teeth and each other. About half-an-hour later I could open my mouth again, but the glue stayed on my teeth for days. It didn't help that my friend who saw all of this happen was laughing so hard he was almost crying. :-)
Pat
PaPaPeng - 16 Oct 2007 06:41 GMT >So I took the tube and grabbed the needle with my teeth, and pulled back >on the tube. I used to do that, without hesitation to use my teeth as a convenient tool in lieu of anything available at hand. Then I read this Reader's Letter in the local papers, a complaint from a ticket collector. It grosses her out that a patron wouldn't think twice of holding the ticket(s) with his teeth or lips while he fumbled around his pockets for something. After that, of course handing her the saliva tainted ticket. The mental image is indelible and I won't do that, bite and hand object to another person, any more.
Pat Flannery - 16 Oct 2007 06:48 GMT > I used to do that, without hesitation to use my teeth as a convenient > tool in lieu of anything available at hand. Then I read this Reader's [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > hand object to another person, any more. > My dentist once asked me why my back teeth were chipped up on my right jaw. "What do you do, open beer bottles with them?" "Yes...so?" :-)
Pat
Bert-Jan - 16 Oct 2007 12:54 GMT > My goofy CA story. > Once long ago, I had a tube of Super Glue that was plugged. I didn't [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Pat I couldn't help myself but starting laughing and now have coffee spilled over my key board!!!!
Thanks!
 Signature Cheers,
Bert-Jan
Art Murray - 14 Oct 2007 05:03 GMT I got back into modelling by first building a Guillows Spitfire, a favorite kit when younger. I used CA - for about three minutes. The porous balsa not only absorbed the CA but it went right through the balsa to my fingers. I had to borrow my wife's nail polish remover to remove the balsa from my fingers.
Use Elmer's Wood Glue or plain Elmer's White Glue.
> Hey I just got the 1903 wright flyer balsa wood model. I never built a > balsa wood model before and I keep reading everywhere that CA glue is > the preferred. Can I use regular super glue or krazy glue, since I > believe both are cyanoacrylate, or do I need some special formulation > of CA. Any hekp would be appreciated--thanks. Boris Beizer - 14 Oct 2007 16:36 GMT >I got back into modelling by first building a Guillows Spitfire, a favorite >kit when younger. I used CA - for about three minutes. About the time it takes to set, I see. You made several mistakes. Once you rectify those errors, you'll find that CA's are THE adhesive s of chi=oice for wood nmodels,specially, balsa models.
1. I mentioned the fact that the closer the wood-to-wood fit, the better the joint. Use really sharp tools and get a very good,accurate fit before you apply the cement.
2. parts should be held together by pins to the board and/or other kinds of clamps. Never use your fingers as a clamp. with CA. What were your fingers doing any where near the joint.
3.You used far, far, far too much of the stuff, so it slopped all aver the place and on to your fingers. The tip, rspecially fo thin CA is much too gross. You can buy applicator tips that are like a fine hypodermic needle, so you squeeze out only one tiny drop at a time ... just at the joint and bowheres else. I sometimes put a drop on a toothpicjk nd touch that to the joint. it wicks in an without any slop. I also use dental pick, which have the dvantage that you can clean them. There are many other rypes of applicators you can use.
> The porous balsa not only absorbed the CA Which is great, because it really strenghtens the joint. but it went right through the balsa to my fingers.
Goes to show, yet again why theGullows kits were the worst ones on the market. They used only the cheapest, softest balsa. Better balsa does not wick so violently.
> I had to borrow my wife's nail polish remover to remove the balsa from my > fingers. Good hobby shops also sell de-bond (bond disolver) which is far more effective than nail polish remover. Acetone also works better. Always have some debonder around, because we all make mistakes.. and even after years of using, also occasionally glue fingers together.
> Use Elmer's Wood Glue A poor substitute for tight-bond or plain Elmer's White Glue. An even more inferior product compared to tight bond.
Since you're new to CA, note that it is the adhesive of choice when you cut your finger with the sharp scalpel. Jut push the joint together to a good approximation, dab the excess blood off and put on a drop of CA. Stings, but works perfectly.Can often (and is used by doctors to avoid stitches. Of course you can use the "medical" CA at$5.00 /cut, but hobby CA is just as sterile an works as well. Let's see you do that with Elmer's
Boris
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 15 Oct 2007 14:27 GMT > Goes to show, yet again why theGullows kits were the worst ones on the > market. They used only the cheapest, softest balsa. Better balsa does not > wick so violently. > > Boris I agree that the balsa in Guillows kits leaves a lot to be desired. But I do not find that a problem. I find Guillows kits among the best for scale accuracy. If, as frequently the case, I am not going to fly a kit, but build it for shelf scale, I replace balsa stringers with basswood or styrene anyway. I also replace a lot of the sheetwood parts with styrene if it is going to be visible (as inside the cockpit) 'cause it finishes easier.
I am building their Dauntless and this kit gives alternate plans for several areas- a flying model surface and a scale surface, such as tail surfaces. Also alternate cockpit areas if you are not running the rubber motor through it.
I am covering it with sheet styrene with embossed rivets.
Boris Beizer - 15 Oct 2007 16:23 GMT >> Goes to show, yet again why theGullows kits were the worst ones on the >> market. They used only the cheapest, softest balsa. Better balsa does [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > But I do not find that a problem. I find Guillows kits among the best > for scale accuracy. I was a flying model (free-flight rubber (Wakefield) and gliders) builder. As such I quickly learned that so-called "flying scale" (at least for rubber and low powered gas) was an oxymoron. Flying scale did not become a reality untilgood engines came along. at first, only for U-contrlol. Now, of course, despite the many aerodynamic compromises one has to make very realistic RC scale is possible and thriving.
> If, as frequently the case, I am not going to fly a kit, but build it for > shelf scale, Before I dropped aircraft in favor of priod ships, I built many plastic scale models. Those kits (with upgrades)are available with outrageous level of detail sufficient to satisfy the pickiest rivet counter-- so why bother with all the compromises of building balsa scale? The various kits offered by Model Expo of the wright flyer, and WWI Jennie look very appealing to meThey are built-up, ultra realistic, very big, and yo my mind, a far more satisfactory exercise than doing aullows balsa-based kit.
I replace balsa stringers with
> basswood or styrene anyway. I also replace a lot of the sheetwood > parts with styrene if it is going to be visible (as inside the > cockpit) 'cause it finishes easier. In other words, you are using the kit as a sort of 3D set of plans.
> I am building their Dauntless and this kit gives alternate plans for > several areas- a flying model surface and a scale surface, such as > tail surfaces. Also alternate cockpit areas if you are not running > the rubber motor through it. > > I am covering it with sheet styrene with embossed rivets. That is somewhat extreme in the realm of kit-basing. But hey: Why do people climb mountains? mostly for the challenge, and because they can. Good luck to you. Post some pics when you're done. Paull Gullows will sit up in his grave, smile, and say:that's what I intended all along.
Boris
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 16 Oct 2007 14:48 GMT > That is somewhat extreme in the realm of kit-basing. But hey: Why do > people climb mountains? mostly for the challenge, and because they can. > Good luck to you. Post some pics when you're done. Paull Gullows will sit up > in his grave, smile, and say:that's what I intended all along. > > Boris I hope so. Paul was one of my heros. My very first model was a Guillows Aeronca. This was in about 1947 (before plastics). Never got it to fly- it got damaged before trimming. But I was so thrilled to complete it after several years of unsuccessful attempts at building "stick models." While I likely built far more Comet models than Guillows, I always felt that the latter were a cut above the Comet ones I could afford.
Glad to see Estes has continued the Guillow line, but sad to see they terminated the Comet line. What was the Comet founder- Bill someone. He lived to a ripe old age, dying only a couple of years ago (know that even if I cannot come up with his name at present).
willshak - 15 Oct 2007 16:26 GMT on 10/15/2007 9:27 AM Don Stauffer in Minnesota said the following:
> >> Goes to show, yet again why theGullows kits were the worst ones on the [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > I, for one, would like to see some photos of the construction and finished model.
 Signature Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @
Pat Flannery - 16 Oct 2007 04:29 GMT > I am building their Dauntless and this kit gives alternate plans for > several areas- a flying model surface and a scale surface, such as [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I am covering it with sheet styrene with embossed rivets. > Me, I'd just wait for the 1/18 scale Dauntless to eventually come out: http://www.admiraltoys.com/Retailers/SBD/SBD1.html
Pat
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 14 Oct 2007 16:36 GMT > I got back into modelling by first building a Guillows Spitfire, a favorite > kit when younger. I used CA - for about three minutes. The porous balsa [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Use Elmer's Wood Glue or plain Elmer's White Glue. That is why you need to use the gel form of CA on balsa. It dries slower than the regular CA, but far quicker than white glue.
|
|
|