Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / October 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ARM: Review - DML 1/35 scale Afrika Korps Panzergrenadiers El Alamein 1942

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AMPSOne@aol.com - 13 Oct 2007 01:24 GMT
Kit Review: Dragon Models Limited 1/35 scale '39-'45 Series Kit No.
6389; Afrika Korps Panzergrenadier El Alamein 1942; 76 parts in grey
styrene; price estimated at US$8.95

Advantages: new release of figures will help out German desert fans

Disadvantages: why no "Gen2" weapons sets?

Rating: Highly Recommended

Recommendation: for all German diorama and desert fans

    DML still seems to have a large supply of "original series" figures
in stock and keeps releasing them from time to time to keep us on our
toes. This new set provides four figures in combat poses which should
be appreciated by desert warfare fans.

    The four figures consist of a two-man machine gun team based around
an MG-34, one man loading a Kar 98K rifle in the kneeling position,
and an officer directing them from a crouch. The weapons are mostly
separate (the MG34 is an older model less the "slide molded" details
and hollow bore, and the rest of them - a Kar 98K, a Gewehr 43, an
MP40, an MP44, a Panzerfaust 60 and an MG42 with accessories - are
from kit No. 6003) and no brass is provided for straps or detailing. I
say mostly because the officer comes with a Luger molded in place; at
least with small arms like pistols this makes better sense as it looks
to be held for use rather than "stuck on" as too many do when modelers
try to fit them to the hands of figures.

    The figures are all basic DML types of six basic parts (head, torso,
arms and legs) with molded in place coat skirts. These figures are
wearing the desert canvas uniform with long trousers and long sleeves.
Two helmets have camouflage covers, two do not and one set of sand
goggles is provided for the officer. Two of the figures (the officer
and the rifleman) have defensive grenades ("potato mashers") stuck in
their belts, which are provided as separate parts.

    The machine gunner is operating the weapon from the prone position
and the assistant is feeding ammo from a box. The positions look far
more natural than some but preclude "digging in" as the gunner is
completely prone.

    Artwork is by another of DML's artists and the directions are the
photographic rendering type and not the excellent artwork of Ron
Volstad. They consist of "paint this color here" flags and tags on a
miniature version of the box art.

    Overall, this is a good idea and as many modelers tend to suffer from
overkill with the full "Gen2" sets a reversion to the "old school" is
a good idea every now and again. But the "Gen2" weapons are better,
and having the rifleman with his bolt open as in "Gen2" style would
have made a bit more sense.

    Thanks to Freddie Leung for the review sample.

Cookie Sewell
AMPSOne@aol.com - 13 Oct 2007 19:52 GMT
OOPS! Before anyone asks yes, the officer is holding a Walther P-38
and NOT a Lugar. Think one, type the other, look dumb.

Cookie Sewell
someone@some.domain - 13 Oct 2007 20:27 GMT
>OOPS! Before anyone asks yes, the officer is holding a Walther P-38
>and NOT a Lugar. Think one, type the other, look dumb.
>
>Cookie Sewell

gee, let's have the people who have never made a mistake speak up......
i think you're covered, cookie. besides, walther was a better gun, imnsho.
AMPSOne@aol.com - 13 Oct 2007 21:49 GMT
On Oct 13, 2:27?pm, some...@some.domain wrote:
> In article <1192301530.536916.174...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, AMPS...@aol.com wrote:
> >OOPS! Before anyone asks yes, the officer is holding a Walther P-38
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> gee, let's have the people who have never made a mistake speak up......
> i think you're covered, cookie. besides, walther was a better gun, imnsho.

>From what I recall the Luger (SP on the one above - when you're having
a bad day go all the way!) was a better gun but not as user friendly.
My father indicated that friends of his told him that mid to late war
P-38s had a problem with the locking pin being weak and the pin
failing, causing the slide to come off with nasty results. Modern P-1s
back to the old standards.

Cookie Sewell
someone@some.domain - 13 Oct 2007 22:30 GMT
>On Oct 13, 2:27?pm, some...@some.domain wrote:
>> In article <1192301530.536916.174...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Cookie Sewell

you can fix the old guns fairly easily. but they were scary.
kim - 14 Oct 2007 00:51 GMT
> On Oct 13, 2:27?pm, some...@some.domain wrote:
>> In article <1192301530.536916.174...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> P-38s had a problem with the locking pin being weak and the pin
> failing, causing the slide to come off with nasty results.

Old Lugers have a similar problem with the toggle becoming weak with metal
fatigue. I'm told it's also possible to accidentally reassemble a Walther
P38 without the locking pin altogether with equally disastrous results.

(kim)
Pat Flannery - 14 Oct 2007 21:20 GMT
> Old Lugers have a similar problem with the toggle becoming weak with metal
> fatigue. I'm told it's also possible to accidentally reassemble a Walther
> P38 without the locking pin altogether with equally disastrous results.
>  

That's gotta hurt! I almost took the top of my thumb off once by using a
bad two-handed grip on a .45 Colt, and having the slide run into it on
the way back.
For real fun, read up on the wonderful, horrible, Mars pistol - a
complex monster of a gun noted for kicking like a mule, and ejecting the
hot spent cartridge case directly into the user's face:
http://www.horstheld.com/0-Mars.htm
Still, the bullets came out of the barrel going like a bat out of hell,
in the .45 version going at 1,250 fps vs. the Colt's 885 fps.

Pat
Pat Flannery - 14 Oct 2007 20:55 GMT
> >From what I recall the Luger (SP on the one above - when you're having
> a bad day go all the way!) was a better gun but not as user friendly.
> My father indicated that friends of his told him that mid to late war
> P-38s had a problem with the locking pin being weak and the pin
> failing, causing the slide to come off with nasty results. Modern P-1s
> back to the old standards.

I've fired WW II examples of both the P08 and P38, and much preferred
the P38.
The Luger's toggle action makes it recoil in a odd manner- it recoils
backwards as expected, but also has a peculiar up-and-down motion due to
the mass of the moving toggle system that occurs at the same time.
This means that it's hard to keep it on target between shots and makes
rapidly firing accurately with it in a difficult without a lot of
practice. In fact, the old broom-handle C96 Mauser pistol is easier to
fire rapidly in a accurate manner.
The P38 on the other hand is very simple to learn to use, and fires a
very accurate pattern with almost no practice.
That, combined with the inherent safety of of the double action system
makes it a really exceptional pistol.
If you do run into a WW II P38 for sale you might be wise to figure out
some way to fire it remotely for the first few shots.
The Germans modified some ones they thought might be captured by placing
explosives under the handgrips that would detonate when the pistol was
fired.
I don't know what would happen if you tried to remove the handgrips on
one that had been booby-trapped like that, but you might want it to
someone who knew about this in detail.

Pat
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.