they don't look right, are they for a British fighter or some other
country??
dont wanna bid on something that has poor decal options...
Craig
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270184939137&ssPageName=ADME:
B:SS:US:1123
Jack G - 09 Nov 2007 17:28 GMT
See
<http://www.homepages.mcb.net/bones/01UKAV/roundels/RAF_ROUNDELS.htm>
Jack G.
> they don't look right, are they for a British fighter or some other
> country??
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270184939137&ssPageName=ADME:
B:SS:US:1123
willshak - 09 Nov 2007 17:31 GMT
on 11/9/2007 12:19 PM crw59@earthlink.net said the following:
> they don't look right, are they for a British fighter or some other
> country??
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>
They are correct for a British fighter. The box color may be off.
http://www.fortunecity.com/meltingpot/portland/971/Inbox/g-j/hurri-iic-i_32.htm

Signature
Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @
Enzo Matrix - 09 Nov 2007 17:51 GMT
> they don't look right, are they for a British fighter or some other
> country??
>
> dont wanna bid on something that has poor decal options...
They appear to be correct. The Fuselage roundels are Type A1 which were
standard up until about May 1942. The subsequent C1 roundel had a narrow
white ring, which is probably what you were expecting.
The squadron markings are from 73 Sqn which used the Hurricane IIC from June
42 till July 43. Note that repainting of aircraft was not a priority in the
Desert Air Force, so it is entirely probable that aircraft would have
continued to carry the earlier style roundels after the supposed changeover
point.

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.