Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Using References Drawing Drawn or Photographed At An Angle

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Albert - 10 Nov 2007 02:41 GMT
I am building a model that is replaced by a better kit. I have an old
TBY
vacuform that was started a while back. Later I obtained a more
elaborate resin
kit. However, the fact I have an excellent reference book coupled with
how wide
open the cockpit of this aircraft led me to see this vacuform kit as
an ideal
guide for work on other vacuform kits I have that still are the only
example of
a particular aircraft such as the XP-54 kit I have.

Here is my question. How does one handle the measurements of the many
excellent
views I have in the TBY book? The basic lay out is dealt with with
precision,
eg, how long is the aircraft, wing span. Yet I am stumped about thing
that have
photos are drawings taken at an angle. Is an educated guess the best
bet? Since
the TBY is a USN aircraft should I look for similarities for better
documented
aircraft. Perhaps finding out how big a seat , a radio, a throttle is?

TIA

Big Al Cherer
RobG - 10 Nov 2007 11:56 GMT
Albert <albertcherer@comcast.net> wrote in news:1194662504.649578.200610
@v2g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

> I am building a model that is replaced by a better kit. I have an old
> TBY
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Big Al Cherer

I recall a computer program that was developed for making 3-view drawings
using scans of articles - I had a demo of it somewhere, once. If I can
find it, I'll post the name here and let you know. But don't hold your
breath.

RobG
(The Aussie one)
Don Stauffer in Minnesota - 10 Nov 2007 15:17 GMT
> I am building a model that is replaced by a better kit. I have an old
> TBY
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Big Al Cherer

That IS indeed a tough one.  When I am taking my own pictures, I can
ensure that I am perpendicular to major axes.

However, on some subjects I am left with only quartering pictures.  If
one were to use pure photogrammetry, one needs to know the distance
from the subject to the camera as well as the camera lens focal
length, not very practical unless you know the photographer.

Therefore, you can only deal with relative distances.  You need some
basic dimensions that you will NOT be able to obtain from the photos.

Vertical dimensions are the easiest ones to scale, since most
prototypes are shorter in that direction than in other directions.
You assume that everything in a vertical column is indeed vertical and
so is the same distance from camera (assuming camera is held
reasonably level).  Now you can measure distances along that vertical
and ratio the sizes.  This does only give you relative dimensions,
which is why you need some basic dimensions.

While many photo editing programs these days have a perspective
correction function, this is certainly imperfect for any direction
with a component along the camera line of sight.

BTW, I taught myself to use CAD when I was trying to make scale
drawings from a number of photographs of a race car.  Fortunately, I
did know the wheelbase and width of the car, and the tire sizes.  I
used what I learned from that exercise to take or seek out photographs
of many vintage race cars, which I did five-views of, and I do sell a
CD-ROM of scale drawings and photos for vintage oval track race cars.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.