Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Off Topic religious rant.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RobG - 14 Nov 2007 13:51 GMT
Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.

And please gents, can we get to the topic at hand - SCALE MODELLING? It's
what binds us together after all.

RobG
(The Aussie one)
Jules - 14 Nov 2007 14:34 GMT
> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> RobG
> (The Aussie one)

you mean the god of all plastic and spru's?

I dont like to Revell in religon, and may we all burn in Heller, cant we all
just look up at the Starfix, and breath in the wonderfull clean Airfix, and
i dont belive in the star of David, which its many sides...i worship a
Monogram but with the fiery beast the Dragon..
someone@some.domain - 14 Nov 2007 16:06 GMT
>> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>i dont belive in the star of David, which its many sides...i worship a
>Monogram but with the fiery beast the Dragon..

baliff, whack his pee pee!
CortxVortx - 16 Nov 2007 01:18 GMT
> In article <uHD_i.71549$7_4.61243@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Jules"
> <julianhales@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
> baliff, whack his pee pee!

Oh, WOW, man!

Signature

"Evolution can be mean -- there's no 'dumb-a.s' vaccine." -- Jimmy
Buffett

someone@some.domain - 16 Nov 2007 02:32 GMT
>> In article <uHD_i.71549$7_4.61243@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Jules"
>> <julianhales@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Oh, WOW, man!

you do know that's monty python?
CortxVortx - 24 Dec 2007 19:42 GMT
> In article <Xns99E9CEBF88386wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
> you do know that's monty python?

Cheech and Chong

Signature

"Evolution can be mean -- there's no 'dumb-a.s' vaccine." -- Jimmy
Buffett

someone@some.domain - 24 Dec 2007 20:32 GMT
>> In article <Xns99E9CEBF88386wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
>> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Cheech and Chong

monty python.
baliff whack HIS pee pee!
CortxVortx - 26 Dec 2007 16:35 GMT
> In article <Xns9A1095A62A1E7wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> monty python.
> baliff whack HIS pee pee!

From the "Trippin' in Court" track on "Cheech and Chong," their first
album. Friends & I practically memorized this album when it came out
(yeah, I'm that old).

Check out the YouTube clip: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-OkxEItgWY>

 -- CV
Signature

"Evolution can be mean -- there's no 'dumb-a.s' vaccine." -- Jimmy
Buffett

someone@some.domain - 26 Dec 2007 18:37 GMT
>> In article <Xns9A1095A62A1E7wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
>> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>  -- CV
ok, you're right. i was sure it was in with the lumberjack program.
i plead senility....
CortxVortx - 27 Dec 2007 01:35 GMT
>>> In article <Xns9A1095A62A1E7wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
>>> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> ok, you're right. i was sure it was in with the lumberjack program.
> i plead senility....

Hey, that's okay. Easy to confuse the classics.

http://orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/

<-- you can read the Monty Python sketches.

Albatros!

Signature

"Evolution can be mean -- there's no 'dumb-a.s' vaccine." -- Jimmy
Buffett

Rufus - 27 Dec 2007 02:24 GMT
>>>> In article <Xns9A1095A62A1E7wmewatkinsyahoocom@216.196.97.136>,
>>>> CortxVortx <CortxVortx@restmass> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Albatros!

...better change it to Bruce, then...

Signature

     - Rufus

Pat Flannery - 29 Dec 2007 08:08 GMT
>> Hey, that's okay. Easy to confuse the classics.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> ...better change it to Bruce, then...

That's what this zoo needed mate, more fresh fruit!
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-tiger29dec29,0,1398084.story?coll=la-hom
e-center

Think of that...a zoo in San Francisco with a lack of fresh fruit,
leavin' their patrons open to attack by tigers.
You would 'ave thought they could've found a fresh fruit in seconds in
that city, mate!

Pat
CortxVortx - 29 Dec 2007 15:30 GMT
>>> Hey, that's okay. Easy to confuse the classics.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Pat

What about pointed sticks?!

 -- CV

Signature

"Evolution can be mean -- there's no 'dumb-a.s' vaccine." -- Jimmy
Buffett

Rufus - 29 Dec 2007 15:49 GMT
>>> Hey, that's okay. Easy to confuse the classics.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Pat

...it could grip it by the husk...

Signature

     - Rufus

Rob van Riel - 14 Nov 2007 14:38 GMT
> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>
> And please gents, can we get to the topic at hand - SCALE MODELLING? It's
> what binds us together after all.

Chomp!

Other than that, you're right, the only religion that should have a place
here religious attention to detail.

Rob
willshak - 14 Nov 2007 15:16 GMT
on 11/14/2007 8:51 AM RobG said the following:
> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (The Aussie one)
>  
Agreed, even though I contributed to the thread. This group, unlike many
others, usually sticks to the modeling topics, and doesn't get all tied
up with religion and politics, which just pits one against the other.

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Ed Pirrero - 14 Nov 2007 18:56 GMT
> on 11/14/2007 8:51 AM RobG said the following:> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> others, usually sticks to the modeling topics, and doesn't get all tied
> up with religion and politics, which just pits one against the other.

And really, when it comes down to it, there are just a very few rude
dolts who feel the need to respond to EACH and EVERY politcal/
religious comment thrown out in jest or in passing.  If someone is so
thin-skinned as to not be able to accept that someone else might have
a different opinion or perspective, and thus NEEDS to defend his
beliefs against the "assault" perpetrated in usenet.

This happened the very same way, with the very same dolts, the last
election cycle.

E.P.
Count DeMoney - 14 Nov 2007 19:55 GMT
> > on 11/14/2007 8:51 AM RobG said the following:> Not really - just thought I'd see who bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> E.P.

While we at it, I think it would be good to dispense with the prolific
use of "4 letter words" in the subject line and within discussions.
Just my opinion (:>
AMPSOne@aol.com - 15 Nov 2007 00:32 GMT
Lessee -- to REALLY torque somebody off and come up with a REALLY
REALLY OFF TOPIC topic, we could try this:

MI-5 VICTIM OF IPMS/USA DISCRIMINATION PREPARES TO USE FOUL RELIGIOUS
LANGUAGE AGAINST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
HILBARAKEDWARKUSINICHGULLIAROMNEMPSON FOR RANT AGAINST AEROARMORSHIP
MODEL COMPANIES WHO CHARGE TOO MUCH FOR KITS

Or something like that. Did I miss any trolls?

Cookie Sewell
Count DeMoney - 15 Nov 2007 01:03 GMT
On Nov 14, 5:32 pm, AMPS...@aol.com wrote:
> Lessee -- to REALLY torque somebody off and come up with a REALLY
> REALLY OFF TOPIC topic, we could try this:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Cookie Sewell

You got it all
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.