Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / September 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WWII Aircraft Carriers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
The Old Man - 12 Dec 2007 13:54 GMT
Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
powered barge awaiting its final fate. Launched in about 1912, it is
the sister ship of the SS Seeandbee and the Greater Buffalo. These
ships carried the Great Lakes passenger trade from launching until the
late 1930s, when they were decomissioned.
In 1939, the Seeandbee and the Greater Buffalo were purchased by the
navy for conversion and use as training aircraft carriers.
Okay, so what is so unusual about this?
They were the only paddle-wheel carriers ever used!
Just thought I'd pass this along.....
crw59@earthlink.net - 12 Dec 2007 18:19 GMT
> Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
> powered barge awaiting its final fate. Launched in about 1912, it is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They were the only paddle-wheel carriers ever used!
> Just thought I'd pass this along.....

how do you turn a paddle-wheel carrier into the wind ?  Flank speed is
what, 3 knots?  :-)

Craig
OldSchool - 12 Dec 2007 18:30 GMT
On Dec 12, 1:19 pm, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> > Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
> > powered barge awaiting its final fate. Launched in about 1912, it is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Craig

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/ix-64.htm

uss wolverine (ix-64) and sable (ix-81)

18 knots...on a calm day, not enough wind over deck for operations
someone@some.domain - 12 Dec 2007 23:18 GMT
>On Dec 12, 1:19 pm, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>18 knots...on a calm day, not enough wind over deck for operations
far faster than i thought.
willshak - 12 Dec 2007 18:32 GMT
on 12/12/2007 1:19 PM crw59@earthlink.net said the following:
>  
>> Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Craig
>  
You had to wait for a hurricane. :-)

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

someone@some.domain - 12 Dec 2007 23:18 GMT
>on 12/12/2007 1:19 PM crw59@earthlink.net said the following:
>>  
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>  
>You had to wait for a hurricane. :-)

or the november witch.
Bruce Burden - 13 Dec 2007 03:24 GMT
: You had to wait for a hurricane. :-)

    HA! If any clouds appeared, I expect the capitans were only
   thinking of making port. Still, it would make a nice model, if
   only to flag the fleet admirals' flag from one of them!

                            Bruce
Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
       - Thuganlitha
       The Power and the Prophet
       Robert Don Hughes

Orlando Quattro - 13 Dec 2007 19:50 GMT
=> willshak <willshak@00hvc.rr.com> wrote:
=> :
=> : You had to wait for a hurricane. :-)
=> :
=>         HA! If any clouds appeared, I expect the capitans were only
=>     thinking of making port. Still, it would make a nice model, if
=>     only to flag the fleet admirals' flag from one of them!
=>
=>                                                         Bruce

Here's a video of a spectacular model of the Wolverine - IX-64:

<http://ix-carriers.blogspot.com/2007/09/model-of-uss-wolverine.html>

It's a 1/72nd scale model, and here's a link to a multi-page article
describing the construction of this scratch-built model.

<http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/IX-64/72-bw/wolverine.html

A lovely project indeed.

OIV

Signature

Orlando Quattro -- oquattro at magma dot ca
The Starving Artist's Garratt

Pat Flannery - 13 Dec 2007 21:25 GMT
> Here's a video of a spectacular model of the Wolverine - IX-64:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> A lovely project indeed.

Want to see something odd, check out these aircraft on the U.S.S. Sable:
http://bp3.blogger.com/_jevAwSDMSeo/RqJ2x6bAHEI/AAAAAAAAAGc/6VWwvNICcCQ/s1600/Sa
bleTDN1-1.jpg

Looked at that, and thought "What the hell is it carrying Ta-154s on it
for?"
The aircraft is a NAF TDN-1:
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app1/tdn-1.jpg
http://www.aerofiles.com/NAF-TDN.jpg
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app1/td.html

Pat
Pat Flannery - 12 Dec 2007 21:04 GMT
> how do you turn a paddle-wheel carrier into the wind ?  Flank speed is
> what, 3 knots?  :-)
>  

USS Sable and USS Wolverine:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/ix-64.htm
They could do 18 knots (!)

Pat
someone@some.domain - 12 Dec 2007 23:17 GMT
>> Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
>> powered barge awaiting its final fate. Launched in about 1912, it is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Craig
7-9 on some. they go a lot faster than you would think.
there is a complex formula based on paddle, diameter, power, gearing, and even
water density.
thos steamboat races weren't no 3 knots.
Val Kraut - 13 Dec 2007 00:00 GMT
<> how do you turn a paddle-wheel carrier into the wind ?  Flank speed is
> what, 3 knots?  :-)

Craig,
   This wasn't exactly Fast Carrier Deck Operations. You landed, taxied to
the back of the deck and took off. You had the whole deck. They didn't have
capability to land a squadron and then refuel them. You came and went on
what you brought with you. Six landings and take-offs and you were on your
way to the fleet. I've seen models - lots of underdeck open wood work -
fairly complicated - something like the Langley. Problem is you end up with
one airplane somewhere on an otherwise empty deck.

Would probably make a nice alternate history diorama - deck loaded with
biplanes and an old four stack destroyer as escort, maybe both in splinter
dazzle camo.

                                                                           
           Val Kraut
ddbord - 30 Sep 2008 02:01 GMT
The SS SeeandBee was launched on Nov.6, 1912.  She was owned by the
Cleveland and Buffalo Transit Co.  The Greater Buffalo was launched on
Oct. 23, 1923.  She was owned by Detroit and Cleveland Navigation Co.
Her sister ship, the SS Greater Detroit was launched Sept. 15, 1923.
I sailed on the SS SeeandBee as a child from 1935 until 1939.  Both of
my folks worked on the Great Ship!

>Here's a bit of trivia for you. In Buffalo harbor there is a derelict
>powered barge awaiting its final fate. Launched in about 1912, it is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>They were the only paddle-wheel carriers ever used!
>Just thought I'd pass this along.....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.