Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ARM: Review - DML 1/35 scale British 8th Army Infantry El Alamein     1942

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AMPSOne@aol.com - 29 Dec 2007 22:32 GMT
Kit Review: Dragon Models Limited 1/35 Scale '39-'45 Series Kit Np.
6390; British 8th Army Infantry El Alamein 1942; 61 parts in grey
styrene; price about US$10

Advantages: nice newly molded figures of "Desert Rats" will be
appreciated; very nicely done "original style" figures

Disadvantages: Commonwealth troops yet to rate "Gen2" weapons and kit

Rating: Highly Recommended

Recommendation: for all Commonwealth desert warfare fans

    It seems to be all too rare that DML turns its attention to something
other than WWII German subjects when it comes to their excellent line
of figures, and therefore it is always an occasion when something not
wearing swastikas pops up in the "new items" list. This is the first
set of Commonwealth figures in some time, and with the advent of new
WWII African campaign related vehicles (alas, not from DML) they will
be well appreciated.

    The set provides four figures in standard short sleeve/short pants
desert attire: an officer with a Webley pistol and a whistle, a
kneeling figure with a Thompson and 50-round drum. an advancing
infantryman with an SMLE and bayonet, and a crouching Bren gunner.
Each figure is composed of the "standard" DML breakdown (head, torso,
arms and legs) and has several items of kit - canteen, backpack, ammo
pouches, "tin hats" and holsters for those authorized them.

    The only surprising item is that so far the British do not rate the
"Gen2" treatment for their weapons as the German figures have
received. The weapons in this set are from the much older British
Commonwealth Troops, NW Europe 1944 set (No. 6055) - two SMLE, a Sten
gun and a Bren with two options for its bipod (closed or open). A new
Thompson (parts 10 and 11) and an older model of the SMLE with flush
muzzle, bayonet and scabbard (parts 14-16) are included but the latter
is not indicated in the directions, even though it is what the figure
on the box art and directions is clearly holding, but not what is
indicated (part 1 off the 6055 sprue). Go figure. There is also
another pouch (part 12) and an odd item (part 13) on the sprue which
likewise are not called out. I am no longer surprised when DML makes
errors on its major kit directions where more than a thousand parts
are involved, but in this case with but 61 in the box it is hard to
fathom.

    Box art is not bad but it is not credited; however, from the style it
was not done by Ron Volstad but one of the other DML artists.

    Overall, any new set of British figures is welcome, and even more
when new British desert oriented vehicles are becoming available such
as the forthcoming M3 Grant from Academy. (I do wish that, given some
of the disappointment in the uneven quality of recent Academy efforts
DML had done one up to match these figures though.)

    Thanks to Freddie Leung for the review sample.

Cookie Sewell
WmB - 29 Dec 2007 23:12 GMT
> Kit Review: Dragon Models Limited 1/35 Scale '39-'45 Series Kit Np.
> 6390; British 8th Army Infantry El Alamein 1942; 61 parts in grey
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> Cookie Sewell

Many thanks for the reviews.  Indispensable to be able to Google "Cookie
Sewell review" + [subject of interest].

WmB
AMPSOne@aol.com - 30 Dec 2007 18:32 GMT
> <AMPS...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

The scary thing is when I Google it and come up with 4500+ hits!!!

Cookie Sewell
crw59@earthlink.net - 30 Dec 2007 18:45 GMT
On Dec 30, 10:32 am, AMPS...@aol.com wrote:

> > <AMPS...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> Cookie Sewell

so cookie, what was your very first kit review?  How long ago?

Craig
AMPSOne@aol.com - 31 Dec 2007 01:43 GMT
On Dec 30, 1:45 pm, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 10:32 am, AMPS...@aol.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Probably something Calvinesque when five and I could not get a
Lindberg F-94C together, so had feeling it must be a bad kit and not a
bad modeler...

Cookie Sewell
Pat Flannery - 31 Dec 2007 03:55 GMT
> Probably something Calvinesque when five and I could not get a
> Lindberg F-94C together, so had feeling it must be a bad kit and not a
> bad modeler...
>  

My childhood F-94 model had a very odd end.
I wanted it to sit correctly on its nose gear, so I put a lead sinker in
the nose radome with a lot of cement, then immediately glued it to the
model. This worked fine for around a day, then, with no way for the glue
to dry because it was sealed inside the model (which had a solid
bulkhead behind the radome), it dissolved the nose radome from the inside.

Pat
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.