Kit Review: Dragon Model Limited 1/72 Scale Armor Pro Kit No. 7275;
M4A2(76)W Red Army; 177 parts (145 in grey styrene, 29 etched brass, 2
DS plastic, 1 twisted steel wire); price US$13.95
Advantages: new kit of this version in this scale
Disadvantages: Some engine deck details may be off
Rating: Highly Recommended
Recommendation: for small-scale Sherman and Soviet armor fans
The Soviets were pleased to get American M4 medium tanks for a number
of reasons, and one of the most important was that they mostly got the
M4A2 variant with twin GMC diesel engines. Since all other Soviet
tanks built after the start of the war were diesel powered, the fact
that they only needed one form of fuel supply for tanks, as well as
their being less susceptible to fire, was considered a great
advantage. While they thought the 75mm gun was acceptable in all roles
except tank killing, the 76mm gun in the later model Shermans at least
put them on a par with the T-34 76mm tanks in tank-versus-tank combat.
DML has now released a kit of the Soviet version of the Sherman using
many of their myriad of parts for Shermans in 1/72 scale, and this is
one which sports a number of new parts to get the right version. The
model uses the A sprue for the T23 style turret with oval loader's
hatch, and comes with a choice of all three major guns used (M1, M1A1
and M1A1C - without, with threading, and with muzzle brake).
The hull is a brand new molding but does make use of some of the M4A2
(56 degree hull) parts. There is a short correction note in the kit
that shows the changes needed to adapt those parts to this kit, most
of which requires modification to the engine cooling air exhaust
grille under the rear hull overhang. The kit also includes etched
brass grouser stowage bin vent covers so that the modeler does not
have to remove them from the kit.
The suspension is the familiar pressed steel welded wheel set for
VVSS Shermans with flat top return rollers, which I seem to recall is
not quite right for this particular M4A2 variant. (I believe more of
them had the raised return roller mounts by this time of the war.)
One nice new touch is a pair of T49 three-bar steel cleat tracks,
which is more accurate for this particular tank as the Soviets liked
the extra traction they provided. As usual the tracks are single piece
DS plastic runs.
Etched brass comes on two frets and covers most of the small details
such as the stowage rack at the rear of the hull and the light guards.
There is a supplemental fret with the aforementioned covers on it.
Markings and finishing are provided for two vehicles: 2nd Guards Tank
Army, Berlin , 1945 (white 154); and 8th Guards Mechanized Corps,.
1944-1945 (white 216). I would like to have seen Colonel Dmitriy
Loza's white 900 from the Vienna operation, but that's just me!
Overall this is another gap filler in DML's excellent run of small
scale M4 tanks.
Thanks to Freddie Leung for the review sample.
Cookie Sewell
Sprue breakout:
A 39 T23 style turret with oval loader's hatch
B 40 Sherman 47 degree hull details
C 32 VVSS suspension with pressed steel wheels and straight return
rollers
D 32 M4A2 parts and three-piece transmission cover
E 2 M4A2 47 degree hull
X 2 T49 track in DS plastic
Y 1 twisted steel wire
MA 27 Etched brass
MB 2 Etched brass
Bruce Probst - 11 Feb 2008 01:53 GMT
On Feb 10, 8:41 am, AMPS...@aol.com wrote:
>While they thought the 75mm gun was acceptable in all roles
> except tank killing, the 76mm gun in the later model Shermans at least
> put them on a par with the T-34 76mm tanks in tank-versus-tank combat.
I have read that the Russian 76mm AP round was markedly inferior to
the US 76mm round (and German 75mm) in penetration; inferior steel
core or some such. (Mind you, in 1941-42 it was still plenty good
enough to deal with most German AFVs of the period.)
On the other hand I seem to recall reading that there was some problem
with the US 76mm HE round; not as effective as the standard Sherman
75mm round?
Bruce
Melbourne, Australia
Bruce Burden - 11 Feb 2008 04:21 GMT
: On the other hand I seem to recall reading that there was some problem
: with the US 76mm HE round; not as effective as the standard Sherman
: 75mm round?
Due to the higher velocity of the 76mm round, fuzing of
the HE shell was much tricker. As in, getting it to explode
before it buried itself in the ground.
That is the only issue that I am aware of between the US
75mm and 76mm shells.
Bruce

Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes
mike - 11 Feb 2008 04:29 GMT
> On the other hand I seem to recall reading that there was some problem
> with the US 76mm HE round; not as effective as the standard Sherman
> 75mm round?
not a problem, but design considerations. The 76mm
had thicker walls, to resist the force of the main powder
charge: less room for HE. The higher velocity that
aided AP performance and accuracy, hinders HE, as
the shell is likely to bury itself deeper before exploding
than the slower moving 75mm. This also why mortar shells
are among the most deadly for the caliber, slow moving,
very thin walls.
The 75mm shell was nearly as good as the 25 pounder,
while the Soviet 85mm, nearly the same bore as the 25,
was far worse in HE effectiveness, as well
**
mike
**