Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Blackhorse Travel Air

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
chrish1979 - 17 Mar 2008 14:33 GMT
I have recently purchased a Blackhorse Travel Air and need to know the
location of the c of g on this plane as I have lost the instruction manual.

Are there any other things that I should look our for on this plane?

What prop should I be using? I have a OS 46LA fitted currently.

I am new to this hobby, so would be pleased with any guidance given.

Thanks,

Chris
Nigel Heather - 17 Mar 2008 21:31 GMT
I don't have the details of the exact plane in question but as a general
rule of thumb

- if it is a built-up wing then CofG is usually on the main spar

- if foam wing then CofG will be between 25% and 33% of the wing cord from
the leading edge

Having the CofG slightly forward is safer than have it backwards.  With it
forward, the plane will fly stable but will will feel nose heavy.  With it
backward, the plane will be unstable, wanting to pitch up and stall.

Cheers,

Nigel
William R. Mattil - 18 Mar 2008 05:32 GMT
.
> Having the CofG slightly forward is safer than have it backwards.  With it
> forward, the plane will fly stable but will will feel nose heavy.  With it
> backward, the plane will be unstable, wanting to pitch up and stall.

 Nigel,

Don't you have this backwards ? If the CG is to the rear, then the nose
is heavy ... and this is a better thing than the reverse ? ie: CG
forward = tail heavy. Slightly nose heavy is a safer condition when it
stalls.

Bill
Nigel Heather - 18 Mar 2008 18:54 GMT
No I haven't.

I'm assuming that you balance the plane at the CoG.  If you balance the CoG
forward then you need more weight on the nose which is safe.  If you balance
the CoG backwards then you are putting weight on the tail which is bad.

So it is safer to have the CoG forward of the designed position.

It might be that we are both saying the same thing but from different
perspectives.

Cheers,

Nigel
Pat Flannery - 20 Mar 2008 05:23 GMT
> No I haven't.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Cheers,
>  

I think he's talking about a real aircraft here, not a model.
If that's the case, then he needs specific information regarding how the
aircraft will react with its position of CG in flight.
Assuming that, he really does need the Pilot's Flight Manual in regards
to how the aircraft should be loaded and balanced to fly safely, as
every aircraft is different in that regard.
In the case of a static model, all we need to do is get enough lead in
the nose to make it sit right on its nose gear.
In RC models CG makes a difference in regards to flight characteristics,
but who ever started describing the specific propeller on a RC aircraft
in regards to its flight characteristics?

Pat
Rufus - 20 Mar 2008 05:43 GMT
>> No I haven't.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Pat

I think he's talking about one of these -

http://www.flyingsites.co.uk/reviews/travelair.htm

General rule of thumb for balancing out an R/C aircraft is to put the CG
at about 1/3 chord - i.e.: balance the model about 1/3 of the distance
aft of the leading edge of the wing.  This being a straight wing
monoplane, that should be ok for starters - balance it with the fuel
tank empty so as to get a slightly forward CG when fueled, and note how
much pitch trim authority your servo system gives you.

As to props - props are spec'd by diameter and pitch - for this
particular one, I'd suggest something about 10 inch, maybe with a 6 or 7
pitch - 10x6 or 10x7 then, maybe an 11/6 depending on how the plane sits
on it's gear, and noting that a 10 might be a little on the small side
for a .46 engine.  6 pitch is a pretty good start for a general purpose
all around fun flying.

Heh...I'm a pretty good guesser, I guess...turns out OS recommends an
11x6 or 11x7 for your motor -

http://www.osengines.com/engines/la.html

If you do end up having to use the smaller diameter, be aware that your
engine will rev higher and you may need to watch it with the throttle.

Signature

     - Rufus

Nigel Heather - 20 Mar 2008 16:55 GMT
At no point was I (or I beleive anyone else) talking about static models.

I was well aware that the OP was talking about a RC aircraft and gave advice
appropriately.

I stand by the general rule of thumb for RC aircraft

- balance on the main spar if there is one
- if not then balance somewhere between 25% and 33% from the leading edge

Most RC plan plans show a small range of balance points - forward for more
stable docile flying and rearward for more sensitive aerobatic flying

This is why I recommended that a beginner should balance at the forward part
of the CoG range.

Cheers,

Nigel
tomcervo - 22 Mar 2008 13:50 GMT
> I think he's talking about a real aircraft here, not a model.
> If that's the case, then he needs specific information regarding how the
> aircraft will react with its position of CG in flight.

No, he means this:
http://www.americanpioneerhobbies.com/travelair_dragger.html

and I'd be surprised if the company didn't send him at least a
photocopy of the manual upon request.

I thought the thread was about this:

http://www.aviation-history.com/travelair/6000b-1.htm

and why I have to make it as a vac-form or scratchbuilt has always
been a puzzle. They didn't call it the Golden Age for nothing.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.