No I haven't.
I'm assuming that you balance the plane at the CoG. If you balance the CoG
forward then you need more weight on the nose which is safe. If you balance
the CoG backwards then you are putting weight on the tail which is bad.
So it is safer to have the CoG forward of the designed position.
It might be that we are both saying the same thing but from different
perspectives.
Cheers,
Nigel
> No I haven't.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Cheers,
>
I think he's talking about a real aircraft here, not a model.
If that's the case, then he needs specific information regarding how the
aircraft will react with its position of CG in flight.
Assuming that, he really does need the Pilot's Flight Manual in regards
to how the aircraft should be loaded and balanced to fly safely, as
every aircraft is different in that regard.
In the case of a static model, all we need to do is get enough lead in
the nose to make it sit right on its nose gear.
In RC models CG makes a difference in regards to flight characteristics,
but who ever started describing the specific propeller on a RC aircraft
in regards to its flight characteristics?
Pat
Rufus - 20 Mar 2008 05:43 GMT
>> No I haven't.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Pat
I think he's talking about one of these -
http://www.flyingsites.co.uk/reviews/travelair.htm
General rule of thumb for balancing out an R/C aircraft is to put the CG
at about 1/3 chord - i.e.: balance the model about 1/3 of the distance
aft of the leading edge of the wing. This being a straight wing
monoplane, that should be ok for starters - balance it with the fuel
tank empty so as to get a slightly forward CG when fueled, and note how
much pitch trim authority your servo system gives you.
As to props - props are spec'd by diameter and pitch - for this
particular one, I'd suggest something about 10 inch, maybe with a 6 or 7
pitch - 10x6 or 10x7 then, maybe an 11/6 depending on how the plane sits
on it's gear, and noting that a 10 might be a little on the small side
for a .46 engine. 6 pitch is a pretty good start for a general purpose
all around fun flying.
Heh...I'm a pretty good guesser, I guess...turns out OS recommends an
11x6 or 11x7 for your motor -
http://www.osengines.com/engines/la.html
If you do end up having to use the smaller diameter, be aware that your
engine will rev higher and you may need to watch it with the throttle.

Signature
- Rufus
Nigel Heather - 20 Mar 2008 16:55 GMT
At no point was I (or I beleive anyone else) talking about static models.
I was well aware that the OP was talking about a RC aircraft and gave advice
appropriately.
I stand by the general rule of thumb for RC aircraft
- balance on the main spar if there is one
- if not then balance somewhere between 25% and 33% from the leading edge
Most RC plan plans show a small range of balance points - forward for more
stable docile flying and rearward for more sensitive aerobatic flying
This is why I recommended that a beginner should balance at the forward part
of the CoG range.
Cheers,
Nigel
tomcervo - 22 Mar 2008 13:50 GMT
> I think he's talking about a real aircraft here, not a model.
> If that's the case, then he needs specific information regarding how the
> aircraft will react with its position of CG in flight.
No, he means this:
http://www.americanpioneerhobbies.com/travelair_dragger.html
and I'd be surprised if the company didn't send him at least a
photocopy of the manual upon request.
I thought the thread was about this:
http://www.aviation-history.com/travelair/6000b-1.htm
and why I have to make it as a vac-form or scratchbuilt has always
been a puzzle. They didn't call it the Golden Age for nothing.