> For those interested I've posted on alt.binaries.models.scale quite a few
> pictures covering the club stands & competition models from this weekends
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Cheers,
> Stephen.
Just finished DL'g - very nice, thanks for posting them. That's a ton of
pics! Don't let anyone scare you away from posting large format pics. DSL
and cable can handle it. ;-)
I've read good things about the Hobby Boss A-10 in 1/48 (my scale of
choice).
I'm still good with my Monogram early-Hog, but when it's time to do a later
Warthog that'll be my choice.
I never built the Tamiya Warthog - did it suck muck as bad as the reviews
said?
WmB
SL - 28 Apr 2008 22:13 GMT
>> For those interested I've posted on alt.binaries.models.scale quite a few
>> pictures covering the club stands & competition models from this weekends
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> WmB
Not sure about the Tamiya Hog but do recall making a 48th kit when I was
young & it may well have been the Monogram one. Best thing I remember was
that huge gun & being able to take the side panel off to see the gun in all
its glory. Also had a lovely big clear canopy & with the twin tails & all
the armament load options, it was plain impressive & different to everything
else flying around in the 80's.
Next favourite to that back then was the F5-F twin seat tiger-II which I
think was an Italeri offering, no doubt top gun attracting it to me first
amongst other things (K.M.).
These days I like a lot of WW2 subjects & bombers starting to attract me,
particularly with the new Revell Lancaster, just hope they bring it out in
48th as the Tamiya one is getting a bit long in the tooth now. I do however
plan to get the Revell 32nd Ju-88 due in October (I think).
As to the file sizes of the show pictures, I kept the camera to a low
setting but felt it had to be a bit lower still & using MS picture manager
it made it too small, but still acceptable. If anyone needs more detailed
photos I can definitely provide a better resolution, just drop me a line &
I'll post it as attachment.
Cheers,
Stephen.