Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / May 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Post Office Box Rule

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
crw59@earthlink.net - 30 Apr 2008 16:52 GMT
I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
Oh my, have I been breaking a rule?

Craig

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html
Richard Brooks - 30 Apr 2008 17:25 GMT
crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html

It should go to court and have the Postal Services nose rubbed in the
dirt.

Maybe Mr. Adler should just get a knife and scratch one or two of the
letters first or failing that, get a jar of lubricant, send it to the
Postal Services head office and tell them where to stick the box.
kim - 30 Apr 2008 19:45 GMT
> crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
>> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Maybe Mr. Adler should just get a knife and scratch one or two of the
> letters first

They were turned inside-out so there was no lettering showing. I've often
had "Priority Mail" boxes sent to me in England that way.

(kim)
willshak - 30 Apr 2008 19:56 GMT
on 4/30/2008 2:45 PM kim said the following:
>  
>> crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> (kim)

How did the PO know they were priority boxes when they were turned
inside out?
I wonder whether the USPS hqtrs. warned him not to use the boxes, or was
it just a local postmaster/postmistress?

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

kim - 30 Apr 2008 22:58 GMT
> on 4/30/2008 2:45 PM kim said the following:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> How did the PO know they were priority boxes when they were turned
> inside out?

That beats the hell out of me? The only way I could tell is when I opened
them. The only clue as to what they were previously is their external
dimensions.

(kim)
someone@some.domain - 01 May 2008 01:44 GMT
>> on 4/30/2008 2:45 PM kim said the following:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>(kim)

there seems to be a lot of unproffesional and arbitrary bullshit in some po's.
one here needs to be publically terminated for assholism.
M. J. Rudy - 30 Apr 2008 23:53 GMT
>on 4/30/2008 2:45 PM kim said the following:
>>  
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>I wonder whether the USPS hqtrs. warned him not to use the boxes, or was
>it just a local postmaster/postmistress?

I don't know about the square box pictured, but at least some of the
Priority Mail boxes have USPS printed in black ink on the inside. They
started to do this after lots of bulk shippers (eBay power sellers
mostly) were turning NEW boxes inside out and using them for Media
Mail (much lower rate).  Though I fail to see the logic behind
refusing to accept a Priority or Express Mail  box that has already
been used for its intended purpose (and the proper amount of postage
paid).  Perhaps they're afraid that if they start letting people
recycle USED boxes, the same old problem with misusing NEW boxes will
come up again...

M. J. Rudy
http://www.geocities.com/mjrudymodels.index.html
Mad-Modeller - 01 May 2008 06:05 GMT
> on 4/30/2008 2:45 PM kim said the following:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> In Hamptonburgh, NY
> To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Some of those people have the frickin' dimensions memorised.  I tried
that once and got it rejected even though it was inside-out.  The clerk
'knew'.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
M. J. Rudy - 01 May 2008 20:35 GMT
>Some of those people have the frickin' dimensions memorised.  I tried
>that once and got it rejected even though it was inside-out.  The clerk
>'knew'.

I wish PayPal would "know" the measurements of the standard PM boxes.
Entering the dimensions of your box is an annoying little detail that
you now HAVE to fill out when buying your postage thru them.  Why
can't we just put in the number on the side of the PM box ?!

M. J. Rudy
http://www.geocities.com/mjrudymodels.index.html
Bruce Burden - 02 May 2008 04:41 GMT
: I wish PayPal would "know" the measurements of the standard PM boxes.
: Entering the dimensions of your box is an annoying little detail that
: you now HAVE to fill out when buying your postage thru them.  Why
: can't we just put in the number on the side of the PM box ?!

    I think ebay/paypal being "helpful" would result in more
    "service" fees being accessed.

                            Bruce
Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
       - Thuganlitha
       The Power and the Prophet
       Robert Don Hughes

Mad-Modeller - 02 May 2008 04:59 GMT
> : I wish PayPal would "know" the measurements of the standard PM boxes.
> : Entering the dimensions of your box is an annoying little detail that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>                                                         Bruce

They must be following government models.  That's the way it goes here
with the local city government.  I lived in town for 21 years and felt
like a cow being milked of money constantly.  Every time I see one of
those bumper stickers that say "I Love City Life" I want to disabuse the
idiot of that notion.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Ron Smith - 05 May 2008 15:37 GMT
> I wish PayPal would "know" the measurements of the standard PM boxes.
> Entering the dimensions of your box is an annoying little detail that
> you now HAVE to fill out when buying your postage thru them.  Why
> can't we just put in the number on the side of the PM box ?!

Even the USPS website screws up dimweight, why would Paypal be any
different?
Richard Brooks - 30 Apr 2008 20:34 GMT
kim said the following on 30/04/2008 19:45:
>> crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
>>> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> (kim)

I was assuming that it was inside-out but it's worth defacing it a bit
now if the money-grabbing tight-fisted gets try screwing every penny
from a product that they've sold on.
Mad-Modeller - 01 May 2008 06:22 GMT
> kim said the following on 30/04/2008 19:45:
> >> crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> now if the money-grabbing tight-fisted gets try screwing every penny
> from a product that they've sold on.

Ah, but they come free.  Thusly, every box not used properly has cost
them money.
I know one model car seller who uses the freebie boxes and ships UPS.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 01 May 2008 06:47 GMT
>> kim said the following on 30/04/2008 19:45:
>> >> crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

the flat rate cubes are great. i grab as many as they have just to piss off
the counter monkeys.
Richard Brooks - 01 May 2008 13:06 GMT
Mad-Modeller said the following on 01/05/2008 07:16:
>> I was assuming that it was inside-out but it's worth defacing it a bit
>> now if the money-grabbing tight-fisted gets try screwing every penny
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

If you GIVE something away then ownership is relinquished so it
doesn't matter what it's used for after that (even parcel bombs) or
you say that it's not being given away but on loan with a proviso,
like software licenses.
Kevin(Bluey) - 15 May 2008 08:39 GMT
> Mad-Modeller said the following on 01/05/2008 07:16:
>>> I was assuming that it was inside-out but it's worth defacing it a bit
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it's not being given away but on loan with a proviso, like software
> licenses.

Agreed ,so I reckon once they give the box away to the customer the box
becomes their property.When the item is recieved at the other end then
the box becomes the property of the receiver.

I would think that the cost of the box would be included in the postage
cost any way .
Here in Australia you buy the boxes or satchels before you post the item
,no "freebies" here.

Signature

Kevin (Bluey)
"I'm not young enough to know everything."

bluey69@west.net.com.au

Bruce Burden - 16 May 2008 03:30 GMT
: Here in Australia you buy the boxes or satchels before you post the item
: ,no "freebies" here.

    The USPS has been dysfunctional for many decades now. The
   free priority boxes were a way to increase sales, but even a
   member of the US Postal Service Board of Reagents should have
   been smart enough to realize where the "free boxes" campaign
   was going to lead.

    Add to that a report from the (US) Government Accounting
   Office (GAO) which states that the USPS can't determine whether
   their web site is making any money or not.

    And, of course, the fee you pay for the USPS "tracking"
   service. All that "service" does is let you know that the
   USPS has received an invoice for a package, and the tracking
   service stays that way until it is delivered, at which time
   the web site helpfully says "delivered". Not to whom, or what
   time, but simeply "delivered". And to think that UPS, FedEx,
   DHL et. al. don't charge "extra" for their tracking service.

    So, it is unsurprising that the USPS makes assinine rules
   about how you can use "their" box.

                            Bruce
Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
       - Thuganlitha
       The Power and the Prophet
       Robert Don Hughes

someone@some.domain - 30 Apr 2008 19:17 GMT
>I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
>brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html
no, not in the real world.
jthmpson@arvotek.net - 30 Apr 2008 22:43 GMT
On Apr 30, 11:52 am, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html

Am I missing something? The article quotes a postal service
mouthpiece:
"Reiter said the boxes are a cost to the Postal Service and it
supplies them for free to customers who pay for priority or express
mail. She said enforcing the no-recycling rule would keeps postal
rates low for everyone."

If the box is "free" (as long as you pay for priority or express
mail), then how does reusing the boxes drive up the cost of postal
rates? Even if you really do *pay* for the box (which makes the above
quote a lie) when you're sending something by priority or express, I
still don't see how reusing it affects postal rates any more than
throwing it in the garbage would! Ah, civil servants - trying to find
"logic" in their tax-dollar-grubbing little antics is a sure road to
madness... As the British say, "Seldom civil, and never serviceable",
or words to that effect.

John
Richard Brooks - 30 Apr 2008 23:46 GMT
jthmpson@arvotek.net said the following on 30/04/2008 22:43:
> On Apr 30, 11:52 am, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> John

It's the equivalent to what we call 'stealth taxes' in the UK.
WmB - 01 May 2008 00:28 GMT
> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.htmlter

Here's what is chapping the post office's a.s - right after they came out
with the free boxes they found that people and a lot of small online
businesses were getting the boxes and inverting them - then taking them down
to UPS and giving them their business.  An official action figure
collector's club (no names here) got nailed with a warning (at least) a few
years ago when they were caught inverting USPS freebie boxes, stuffing their
member's collector figure shipments in 'em and trapsing down to UPS with
them. From what I recall it was one pissed off collector and club member
that spotted the misdeed and called the USPS - who take it very seriously I
am told and one fella in Denver can confirm.

The USPS remedied this by printing their name and logo inside the boxes -
but the last shipments I have received from them are plain. They may have
been old boxes, but I've reordered quite a few times, I don't see how. The
new boxes are red and I have yet to order any, so it would be interesting to
see if they are marked inside.

As for how can you tell they are USPS boxes if they are inverted and lack
the internal printing? I have inverted a few and the distinctive ribbing and
color is easy to spot - even easier I imagine if you're a USPS employee.
Why did I invert them? Well not to take them to UPS, that's for sure. I used
them for the old USPS Air Parcel Post, a service which they unfortunately
did not provide a box.  The word at the local counter was the Sgt Schultz
disclaimer - "I know nothing, I see nothing". It was probably breaking the
rules, but USPS still got the business - and at a higher rate than domestic
USPS. But again, I was probably technically breaking a law.

The new Priority Mail boxes are now predominantly red, but regardless of
whether they are old or new you may now use them for the new Priority Air
international shipping - no more inverting. So the USPS has acknowledged
that one aspect of their rule was rather short sighted.

Basically, the USPS provided a nice service and product and as could be
expected, a few people tweaked the rules and others just flat out abused
them. That's got them rankled over the boxes now.  As for the guy in the
article, it appears that the USPS is claiming lifetime rights on the boxes.
I was thinking the box costs would be satisfied on a one time use when
shipping Priorty Mail (and I'm sure they are), but they appear to be looking
at it differently. If they try to claim that they calculated covering the
box costs on one or two shipments per box I would have to call -
"bullshit!". It's unlikely anyone would have factored in boxes being used
more than once and amortizing the costs across several shipments.

In a perfect world or at Walgreens, I suppose.

I'm just glad I don't have to invert them anymore when shipping overseas. It
wasn't difficult, but it's one less thing to muck around with.  IF they want
to really do something I wish they would offer some bigger sizes.  Something
to hold a big Monogram 1/48th WWII bomber kit would scratch my last itch.

WmB
someone@some.domain - 01 May 2008 01:49 GMT
>> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
>> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
>WmB

i'm digitizing a rather extensive record collection for a friend and we use
the same boxes over and over. the major reason is that the boxes the po sells
are really overpriced.
we also have a.shole clerks who are ALWAYS there. we paste cd label leftover
sticky parts over any signs of prior use. one of said clerks is working up to
cardiac arrest when he sees them. i hope to see it.
the ps sucks donkey shlong.
Mad-Modeller - 01 May 2008 06:28 GMT
> >> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> >> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> cardiac arrest when he sees them. i hope to see it.
> the ps sucks donkey shlong.

That last one to arrive here had more tape than paper surface.
It was a major engineering feat to find a way in. :)

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 01 May 2008 06:49 GMT
>> In article <58mdnYJ88J5OYoXVnZ2dnUVZ_quhnZ2d@earthlink.com>, " WmB"
> <HELLinhock@earthlink.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
hehe. how many times did we reuse that box? i hope you saved it, it has at
least one more rt in it.
the last record box from ma was about 35lbs of vinyl and 10 lbs of box, tape,
stickers and bubble wrap. and sent media mail. the counter monkeys really hate
that.
Mad-Modeller - 02 May 2008 04:59 GMT
someone typed out:

>>That last one to arrive here had more tape than paper surface.
>>It was a major engineering feat to find a way in. :)
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

> hehe. how many times did we reuse that box? i hope you saved it, it > has at least one more rt in it.

Its last trip was via Good's Disposal, I'm sorry to say.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 02 May 2008 07:13 GMT
>someone typed out:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
we'll have to start a new messterpiece.
kim - 01 May 2008 16:23 GMT
> As for how can you tell they are USPS boxes if they are inverted and
> lack the internal printing? I have inverted a few and the distinctive
> ribbing and color is easy to spot - even easier I imagine if you're a
> USPS employee.

A friend wrapped his box in brown paper before posting to me so there was
nothing to give away its origin except as mentioned its overall dimensions.

(kim)
crw59@earthlink.net - 02 May 2008 01:08 GMT
> > As for how can you tell they are USPS boxes if they are inverted and
> > lack the internal printing? I have inverted a few and the distinctive
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> (kim)

don''t buy the brown wrapping paper from Ikea. its almost see thru.
my priority boxes went thru just fine, but I think in the future I
will buy the better stuff.

Craig
someone@some.domain - 02 May 2008 01:48 GMT
>> > As for how can you tell they are USPS boxes if they are inverted and
>> > lack the internal printing? I have inverted a few and the distinctive
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Craig
i use paper bags from the supermarket. tell them paper and plastic and you
have a ready source of strong wrapping paper. cut into sheets, put the logo
inside and whoa la. store bought wrapping paper is crappy.
maiesm72@netscape.com - 02 May 2008 09:09 GMT
I used a P.O. box for thirty+ years as my primary address.

Our local post office got the mail into the PO box later and later,
even though they had signs everywhere stating that the P.O. box mail
would be out by 0930.

Many, many complaints later they dealt with it. Changed the signs to
read "Out by 12:00 Noon".

They can't even live up to that. I no longer have a P.O. Box.

Tom

On May 1, 5:48 pm, some...@some.domain wrote:
> In article <e974fcbe-731f-43e9-8e8d-512c70d6a...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
willshak - 02 May 2008 12:41 GMT
on 5/1/2008 8:48 PM someone@some.domain said the following:
>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> inside and whoa la. store bought wrapping paper is crappy.
>  

Brown paper makes the best smoothing 'sandpaper' after you've used all
of the finest wet-dry sandpaper.
And Automotive Polishing Compound does a nice job on polishing up
afterwards.

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

kim - 02 May 2008 02:15 GMT
>>> As for how can you tell they are USPS boxes if they are inverted and
>>> lack the internal printing? I have inverted a few and the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> my priority boxes went thru just fine, but I think in the future I
> will buy the better stuff.

Yeah, the guy who posted to me used that old-fashioned stuff with the rough
surface finish and he doubled it up too as an extra security precaution. I
removed the wrapping so carefully I was able to send it back to him around
another box! :o)

(kim)
Richard Brooks - 01 May 2008 01:48 GMT
crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html

If any of my stuff has to go by ship I might mess with their heads and
paste this logo on;

http://www.atlanticbeachpark.com/images/Whtstar2.gif
someone@some.domain - 01 May 2008 02:44 GMT
>crw59@earthlink.net said the following on 30/04/2008 16:52:
>> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>http://www.atlanticbeachpark.com/images/Whtstar2.gif

except that nothing from the usps goe by sea anymore. or so they claim.
MARK - 11 May 2008 19:29 GMT
I've  reused thoose boxes several times. This is just another example of THE
MAN holding us down for trying to be green.   :-P

> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html
Enzo Matrix - 11 May 2008 20:03 GMT
> I've  reused thoose boxes several times. This is just another example
> of THE MAN holding us down for trying to be green.   :-P

They reckon they want us to be green and so they introduce taxes to force us
to be green.  But if we *try* to be green, they throw obstacles in our way.

They don't actually *want* us to be green. They just want our money...

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Rufus - 11 May 2008 20:23 GMT
...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.

I'm getting ready to put a set of de-motivational slides together around
that theme...women wearing fur, baby seals getting clubbed, oil spills,
wells on fire, Greenpeace boats getting run over by aircraft
carriers...you get the drill...

...I'm bent like dat.

Signature

     - Rufus

> I've  reused thoose boxes several times. This is just another example of THE
> MAN holding us down for trying to be green.   :-P
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html 
Enzo Matrix - 11 May 2008 20:40 GMT
> ...it's not easy being green...

*point*

>global warming - I'm all for it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ...I'm bent like dat.

*snigger*

Signature

Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

someone@some.domain - 12 May 2008 01:42 GMT
>....it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>....I'm bent like dat.

i don't like greenpiece. if you think you're donating to them when someone
knocks, you're not. the pay fundraisers 45% to collect for them.
they did provide a nice recreation dive for scuba nuts....
Mad-Modeller - 12 May 2008 04:43 GMT
> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >>
> >> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html

I have absolutely no problem with women wearing fur, especially if
that's the main thing they are wearing. ;)

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Gray Ghost - 12 May 2008 04:51 GMT
>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

I like nighties with fur trim along the bottom.

Helps to keep thier necks warm.

Frank
Rufus - 12 May 2008 04:58 GMT
>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.

...you know it's February in Chicago when people openly wear and
advertise fur, and nobody has a damn thing to say about it...

Signature

     - Rufus

someone@some.domain - 12 May 2008 05:40 GMT
>>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>....you know it's February in Chicago when people openly wear and
>advertise fur, and nobody has a damn thing to say about it...

stan behind a matron in mink on an elevator and making ssssssssssssss
sounds. can you say hate looks?
Rufus - 12 May 2008 05:57 GMT
>>>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> stan behind a matron in mink on an elevator and making ssssssssssssss
> sounds. can you say hate looks?

...anywhere it don't get cold, I'd reckon.  Folks were all furred up
just a couple years ago.  Adds all over O'Hare, too.

Nuke da whales!

Signature

     - Rufus

someone@some.domain - 12 May 2008 17:04 GMT
>>>>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>Nuke da whales!

nuke fat chicks-vintage 70's poster on many walls
someone@some.domain - 12 May 2008 05:36 GMT
>> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.
Bruce Burden - 13 May 2008 03:24 GMT
: mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.

    1,000,000 BC. Racquel Welch, pteredons and lizards.

    "Cave Man" is also pretty good. Totally different genre,
   but good for laughs.

    No fur bikinis in "Dr. Strangelove", but I hear a fellar
   can have a pretty good time in Vegas with that Air Force
   survival kit...

                            Bruce
Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
       - Thuganlitha
       The Power and the Prophet
       Robert Don Hughes

someone@some.domain - 13 May 2008 03:46 GMT
>: mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.
>:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>                                                        Bruce
20 rubles in gold, 4 chocolate bars and a pack of condoms...
Rufus - 13 May 2008 04:12 GMT
> : mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.
> :
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>                             Bruce

Personally, I liked "Quest for Fire"...

Signature

     - Rufus

someone@some.domain - 13 May 2008 05:02 GMT
>> : mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.
>> :
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Personally, I liked "Quest for Fire"...

was that a raquel welch, too?
willshak - 13 May 2008 14:58 GMT
on 5/13/2008 12:02 AM someone@some.domain said the following:
>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> was that a raquel welch, too?
>  
Rae Dawn Chong (daughter of Tommy Chong of "Cheech and Chong" fame).

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Rufus - 14 May 2008 01:46 GMT
> on 5/13/2008 12:02 AM someone@some.domain said the following:
>>  
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>  
> Rae Dawn Chong (daughter of Tommy Chong of "Cheech and Chong" fame).

...with mo' Chong, and less fur...like none...

Signature

     - Rufus

willshak - 14 May 2008 12:39 GMT
on 5/13/2008 8:46 PM Rufus said the following:
>> on 5/13/2008 12:02 AM someone@some.domain said the following:
>>>  
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> ....with mo' Chong, and less fur...like none...

Yeah, just a chalk-like covering.

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Bruce Burden - 14 May 2008 05:55 GMT
: Personally, I liked "Quest for Fire"...

    Ufff. Elephants dressed in shag carpeting. That is what
   I remember from that stinker.

                            Bruce
Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
       - Thuganlitha
       The Power and the Prophet
       Robert Don Hughes

Mad-Modeller - 13 May 2008 04:52 GMT
> >> ...it's not easy being green...global warming - I'm all for it.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
> mmmmmm, mink bikinis, 60's movies. dr strangelove or something.

Raqel Welch in a caveman movie, "something-or-other B.C.".  That's one
to see just for her appearance there.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
OldSchool - 14 May 2008 20:39 GMT
> some...@some.domain wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

One Million Years BC
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060782/
Mad-Modeller - 15 May 2008 05:18 GMT
> > some...@some.domain wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> One Million Years BC
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060782/

Thank you!

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 12 May 2008 01:40 GMT
>I've  reused thoose boxes several times. This is just another example of THE
>MAN holding us down for trying to be green.   :-P
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html 

the usps is a second rate shipper and greedy pigs to boot.
it's better for them to throw away renewable resource than even have to think
some might beat them for a few pennies.
fer chissakes, he wasn't trying to deceive the smf's!
z - 12 May 2008 19:06 GMT
On Apr 30, 11:52 am, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> I've been reusing these boxes for years, except that I always wrap in
> brown paper.  they are the perfect size for models.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/16072154/detail.html

"The Postal Service said it promotes recycling, as long as customers
pay accordingly,"

huh?
Richard Brooks - 13 May 2008 15:08 GMT
z said the following on 12/05/2008 19:06:
> On Apr 30, 11:52 am, "cr...@earthlink.net" <cr...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> huh?

You could always do what someone spoke about in a comedy programme
long ago and that's to fill a balloon with helium, put it in a box so
that it floats and get the post office to pay you to have it delivered.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.