Slightly OT: Current "Collectible Automobile".
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mad-Modeller - 09 Jun 2008 06:48 GMT While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on Mr. Ross Cousins. He's an artist who has illustrated many cars for brochures and even contributed some styling to various autos. After retiring from GM he did some painting for MPC boxart - most specifically the original Star Wars' kits. OTOH, I hope he didn't have anything to do with the 'Profile Series' boxings of Airfix kits. ;)
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
Peter W. - 12 Jun 2008 02:53 GMT > While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on > Mr. Ross Cousins. He's an artist who has illustrated many cars for [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. Yes, this is a great magazine! I also never imagined seeing a full blown writeup about Ford Maverick in CA Mag! They must be running out of classic collectible American automobiles... I can just see the next one: Ford Pinto - complete story behind Ford's first sub- compact. :-)
Peteski
eyeball - 12 Jun 2008 04:16 GMT > > While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on > > Mr. Ross Cousins. He's an artist who has illustrated many cars for [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Peteski I'm waiting for them to preach the gospel of Yugo...
willshak - 12 Jun 2008 04:18 GMT on 6/11/2008 9:53 PM Peter W. said the following:
> >> While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Peteski > The Maverick was a good car. I bought one the first year it was offered. It was cheaply built, but had good lines. If you saw one for the first time today, you would think it was a new car. The large engine bay looked almost empty with that small 6 cylinder engine, and you could almost stand on the ground inside the bay while working on the engine. Ford sold almost 580,000 Mavs in its first year, which was only second to the first Mustang sales of 619,000 units. But just like other good selling Ford cars, they screwed with it. I never owned a Pinto, but did have a '60 Falcon Futura.
 Signature Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @
someone@some.domain - 12 Jun 2008 04:28 GMT >on 6/11/2008 9:53 PM Peter W. said the following: >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >selling Ford cars, they screwed with it. >I never owned a Pinto, but did have a '60 Falcon Futura. falcons......drool.
Stephen Bierce - 12 Jun 2008 04:52 GMT >The Maverick was a good car. I bought one the first year it was offered. >It was cheaply built, but had good lines. If you saw one for the first [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >to the first Mustang sales of 619,000 units. But just like other good >selling Ford cars, they screwed with it. The Maverick my parents owned--briefly--was a lemon. It was factory new and already rusting. We got our previous car back (a Delta 88 that was six years old) and kept it running for another three or four years.
Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922 {Sig Quotes Removed on Request}
OM - 12 Jun 2008 05:51 GMT >The Maverick my parents owned--briefly--was a lemon. It was factory new >and already rusting. ...A lot of new Mavericks that were sold to people who lived along the coastal regions had that problem, and it was traced back to solvents not being totally cleaned off before the base coat was applied. Ford was reportedly jacking around with new paint formulas back then, according to a couple of mechanic buddies who specialize in vehicles that are Found On Road Dead, and the Maverick was one of the models they field tested the new formulas with.
OM
 Signature ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[
The Old Man - 12 Jun 2008 12:25 GMT > >The Maverick my parents owned--briefly--was a lemon. It was factory new > >and already rusting. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ > ]=====================================[ Gave new meaning to Fix Or Replace Daily......
OM - 12 Jun 2008 17:21 GMT >Gave new meaning to Fix Or Replace Daily...... ...I've owned only one Ford in my life, and it was a 1979 LTD. I bought it for two reasons:
1) That boat, despite poor gas mileage, was built like a battleship(*), and until the gas line broke and blew gas across the manifolds and the thing burned up in a Wal-Mart parking lot, the only thing that went wrong with it was the alternator, which died about every three months. I always kept two spares in the glove compartment, natch.
2) At that time, some guy was making fiberglass Batmobile body replicas with multiple mounting points. One of the chassis that it would fit was the 78-79 run of the LTD. The car only cost me $1500, and had a new tranny in it, so even if I didn't get the body replaced I was still ahead for a backup car.
...In retrospect, there were other issues - the seats were disintegrating, the radio sucked, and the back carpet had rotted due to a window seal leak. But I actually miss that car as much as I miss my Continetaurus - the former I could use as an apartment, the latter was a car that I *wore*. But the sheer irony is that I've never bought a kit of any car I've ever owned - only those I wish I had. Which is probably why the only kit I've got these days is an AMTronic, and it's still in box unbuilt, waiting for the day I decide whether or not to build it as a Federation ground shuttle :-)
...Actually, the AMTronic brings up a good question. The original kit had one of those "3D Ilusion" stickers for a solar panel. IIRC, a Sylvania spin-off company developed the process to make such an illusory surface, and it was based on 3D Baseball Card processes. Sylvania's in-house 3-ring binders had their front covers coated in this stuff, and what was wild wias that when you placed anything on it - say, a pencil, a pen, a quarter, a die - the illusory effect actually took the depth out of the actual object, essentially flattening it. I've been looking for sheets of this material for about 30 years now, and I'll be fracked if I've ever been able to find the source. I actually called Sylvania's marketing department in the early 80's, and a really nice lady - who had two of those binders and loved them! - spent weeks trying to find a source for the stuff, and came up empty handed. She said they weren't making them for Sylvania any more, but offered to send me one of hers. Had she asked me a few years earlier, I'd have been greedy and taken her up on it. But by then I'd become humbled and greatfully but graciously declined her offer, considering how rare those things were she should save them for her grandkids!
...So, anyone got any ideas on where to find, say, a legal-sized sheet of that stuff? I can see lots of uses for it on kits for not just solar panels, but the hexagonal pattern ones reflected so much light that they'd look great in the floor of the Flying Sub!
(*) On the other hand, when some dickwad backed into my 1989 Continental - essentially a pimped-out Taurus - and shoved the left fender into the righ fender of the rear end of the LTD, the LTD's fender caved in while the Contitaurus only suffered a minor chip on the fender rubber. Steel vs plastic ain't supposed to do that, kids!
OM
 Signature ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[
Peter W. - 17 Jun 2008 05:05 GMT > The Maverick was a good car. I bought one the first year it was offered. > It was cheaply built, but had good lines. ....
> Bill That's where I totally disagree. I find them extremely unatractive. Their lines never did anything for me. Same goes for Mustang II. Hey, some like blondes others like brunettes yet others like them bald... :-)
Peteski
Mad Modeller - 17 Jun 2008 07:07 GMT > > The Maverick was a good car. I bought one the first year it was offered. > > It was cheaply built, but had good lines. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Peteski Not me. I like 'em fuzzy at both ends. :)
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
OM - 12 Jun 2008 05:10 GMT >I can just see the next one: Ford Pinto - complete story behind Ford's first sub- >compact. :-) ...You know, the real reason everyone disses on the Pinto these days really boils down to one problem: they were absolutely impossible to really have fun in the back seat unless you and/or your date were about 4'2" :-/
OM
 Signature ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[
someone@some.domain - 12 Jun 2008 07:00 GMT >>I can just see the next one: Ford Pinto - complete story behind Ford's first > sub- [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > OM if you can do it in a vw bug, you can do it anywhere.
Peter W. - 17 Jun 2008 05:02 GMT > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:53:49 -0700 (PDT), "Peter W." > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > OM While that might be true the number contemporary cars which have rear seats as small as Pinto had (or smaller) is huge! Many teenagers of dating age now own such cars. Do you think that 30 years from now they will be dissing all those Hyundais, Kias, Toyotas etc?
Pintos were cheap and crappy vehicles. No matter how you look at them. Just like Chevy Vegas and AMC Gremlins.
Peteski
Mad Modeller - 12 Jun 2008 06:15 GMT > > While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on > > Mr. Ross Cousins. He's an artist who has illustrated many cars for [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Peteski Don't forget - they're over 30 years old now. When was the last time you saw one on the road? Aside from that, I'm a proud former Maverick owner and had mine for 11 years before being talked into trading it on an '81 Omni. Oh, how I wish I'd kept it! I had few problems doing maintenance and replaced the starter motor right in the parking place in front of our house. I kind of thought of it as the new Model A. My only annoyance with it was the lack of vent windows, something that continued in every car I've owned since. "Mavis" was also unusual in having no chrome around the side windows. Every other Maverick I saw on the road had that. Mine was one of the first produced and had the tray under the dash. Going around curves meant that everything in the tray slid side-to-side. Yeah, I loved mine and wish I still had it.
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 12 Jun 2008 07:02 GMT >> > While it is a 1/1 car magazine there is an article in this issue on >> > Mr. Ross Cousins. He's an artist who has illustrated many cars for [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > >Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr. i miss my 68 conti rust special.
|
|
|