> As an additional question to my F16B/D request can someone give me a
> rough outline as to why the Academy F-16A/C is so disliked, I know
> that the fit is not good in places, but what else is wrong with it?
While I personally like the Academy kit, apparently it does have some
major shape issues. If you go over to Hyperscale Forums and do a
search you'll find a pretty extensive breakdown of the issues. Since
the Hasegawa kits tend to be out of my price range, I've had to go the
Academy route. Like I said, I do like the Academy kit it does look (to
me) like what it's supposed to represent.
http://www.clubhyper.com/forums/forum.htm
There's a page out there somewhere that has a pretty extensive
breakdown of the various 1/48 scale F-16s and their issues (yes the
Hasegawa kit has it's own issues), but I can't find it in my favorites
right now.
tomcervo - 03 Jul 2008 14:59 GMT
> > As an additional question to my F16B/D request can someone give me a
> > rough outline as to why the Academy F-16A/C is so disliked, I know
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Hasegawa kit has it's own issues), but I can't find it in my favorites
> right now.
http://www.habu2.net/vipers/
Don McIntyre - 04 Jul 2008 15:26 GMT
> http://www.habu2.net/vipers/
Thanks, Tom.
A rare (on just about any forum) short, sweet and to-the-point post…
tomcervo - 04 Jul 2008 16:21 GMT
> >http://www.habu2.net/vipers/
>
> Thanks, Tom.
> A rare (on just about any forum) short, sweet and to-the-point post…
I noticed it's not updated--nothing about the new Tamiya F-16, a
gamechanger if there ever was one.