
Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
>Can anyone ID the version of Sherman in this photo?
>
>http://www.jpgimage.co.uk/view.php?image=1204
The gun and mantlet shows it to be a Firefly, so it will either be a
IC (modified M4A2) or a VC (modified M4A4).
The shape of the rear deck, plus the fact it has applique armour,
would lead me to believe it is the Firefly IC
AMPSOne@aol.com - 18 Jul 2008 00:52 GMT
> >Can anyone ID the version of Sherman in this photo?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The shape of the rear deck, plus the fact it has applique armour,
> would lead me to believe it is the Firefly IC
Concur -- it has the M4/M4A1 (Sherman I/II) air cleaners and
"fishtail" exhausts clearly visible, so it would be a Sherman IC
Firefly.
Cookie Sewell
kim - 18 Jul 2008 03:13 GMT
>>> Can anyone ID the version of Sherman in this photo?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> "fishtail" exhausts clearly visible, so it would be a Sherman IC
> Firefly.
Canadian methinks as it would be very unusual to have two Fireflies in the
same British troop?
(kim)
Gerald Owens - 18 Jul 2008 22:52 GMT
> AMPS...@aol.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> (kim)
Depends on when it was taken. By the end of the war the ratio of
Fireflies to 75 mm gun tanks was much higher in British regiments. And
yes, it is welded hull Sherman IC, a rather less common version than
the composite hull M4 type (so-called Sherman Hybrid) with the cast
front end or the M4A4 based Sherman VC.
Gerald Owens
Enzo Matrix - 21 Jul 2008 11:05 GMT
Many thanks to all who responded. There are some very interesting comments
there.

Signature
Enzo
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.