>I know - in this case I tried it but it was totally useless (at least
>using my search terms). I tried "focus", "depth of field", "Helicon"
>and several other terms with no luck. See if you can find that
>article...
>
>Peteski
What he said...... FSM's heart is in the right place but the archive
search is pretty fuzzy...
In article
<945c1f68-e9af-44cc-9118-d6db60699d56@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> > FSM has searchable index online...
>
> I know - in this case I tried it but it was totally useless (at least
> using my search terms). I tried "focus", "depth of field", "Helicon"
> and several other terms with no luck. See if you can find that
> article...
Could the article you're looking for be "Photography: Get focused! See
how software can clarify your model photos" in the November 2008 issue?
(I don't have that issue, and the article isn't online, so I don't know
whether it says anything about combining photos.)
I think the reason FSM's online search is less than helpful is that most
of the articles aren't online, so they're only indexed by title, author,
one-line description, and general category.
R. Franklin - 22 Feb 2009 01:20 GMT
>Could the article you're looking for be "Photography: Get focused! See
>how software can clarify your model photos" in the November 2008 issue?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>of the articles aren't online, so they're only indexed by title, author,
>one-line description, and general category.
Bet you that's it. Now I have a target at least. Thanks for the
pointer.