Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / February 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

yo bill b and car guys

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
someone@some.domain - 20 Feb 2009 05:02 GMT
did anyone make a checker mogul kit? the taxi cab version? curbside is ok,
though a six banger motor would be cool. they did put up to 350 v8's in some
of the civilian models. the limos wuold have small blocks, too.
speaking of limo's, i would like 2 kits to hack a limo, but one will do.
if i had a real life limo, it would be a stretched checker. sweet rides.
Mad-Modeller - 21 Feb 2009 05:07 GMT
> did anyone make a checker mogul kit? the taxi cab version? curbside is ok,
> though a six banger motor would be cool. they did put up to 350 v8's in some
> of the civilian models. the limos wuold have small blocks, too.
> speaking of limo's, i would like 2 kits to hack a limo, but one will do.
> if i had a real life limo, it would be a stretched checker. sweet rides.

It's possible they have produced a die-cast model but no plastic ones
that I know of.  IIRC, '83 was the last year for Checkers.  The company
still exists but they stopped building cars.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 21 Feb 2009 18:40 GMT
>> did anyone make a checker mogul kit? the taxi cab version? curbside is ok,
>> though a six banger motor would be cool. they did put up to 350 v8's in some
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
83 is correct. i'm surprised at no kit. that is a really important vehicle.
Mad-Modeller - 22 Feb 2009 03:50 GMT
>>> did anyone make a checker mogul kit? the taxi cab version? curbside is ok,
>>> though a six banger motor would be cool. they did put up to 350 v8's in some
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
> 83 is correct. i'm surprised at no kit. that is a really important vehicle.

It wouldn't be the only really important auto without a kit, or plane
either for that matter.

Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
someone@some.domain - 22 Feb 2009 15:55 GMT
>> In article <49udnX_DN7aVEQLUnZ2dnUVZ_juWnZ2d@dejazzd.com>,
> vze3zb2k@verizon.net wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.
that's too sad....
z - 22 Feb 2009 06:51 GMT
On Feb 21, 1:40 pm, some...@some.domain wrote:
> In article <49udnX_DN7aVEQLUnZ2dnUVZ_juWn...@dejazzd.com>, vze3z...@verizon.net wrote:
> >some...@some.domain wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> 83 is correct. i'm surprised at no kit. that is a really important vehicle.

take a 55 chevy and a lot of putty....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.