Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
skin?
Craig
ctpmdavis@comcast.net - 08 Apr 2009 16:02 GMT
> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
> skin?
>
> Craig
Well, let's see. The WWI Junkers D.1 and it's derivatives, plus the
Junkers F.13
series of early passenger planes. The Ford Tri Motor and probably
others that
are lesser known.
Ol' 45
AM - 08 Apr 2009 17:15 GMT
>> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>> skin?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> are lesser known.
> Ol' 45
A 12, M 21, SR 71 among others.
It was used for increased structural strength.

Signature
AM
http://sctuser.home.comcast.net
http://www.novac.com
vp@novac.com
famvburg@gmail.com - 08 Apr 2009 18:11 GMT
Stout Bushmaster, which was an update of the Tri Motor design.
Quite a few small a/c use currugated skin on the control surfaces.
Lots of Cessnas & Luscombes use this.
> ctpmda...@comcast.net wrote:
> >> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> v...@novac.com
Dave Williams - 08 Apr 2009 19:30 GMT
>>> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>>> skin?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> It was used for increased structural strength.
I think on the Blackbird family it was used more to accommodate thermal
expansion at M3 cruising speeds than for outright structural strength.
Rufus - 08 Apr 2009 19:39 GMT
>>>> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>>>> skin?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I think on the Blackbird family it was used more to accommodate thermal
> expansion at M3 cruising speeds than for outright structural strength.
...and I seem to also recall that it also had the then unexpected effect
of reducing the effective wetted surface area of the jet, reducing skin
friction and making the plane even faster.

Signature
- Rufus
someone@some.domain - 08 Apr 2009 19:52 GMT
>>>>> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>>>>> skin?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>of reducing the effective wetted surface area of the jet, reducing skin
>friction and making the plane even faster.
wheeeee!
frank - 09 Apr 2009 18:36 GMT
> ctpmda...@comcast.net wrote:
> >> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> v...@novac.com
Having worked on SR 71 wouldn't exactly call it corrugated skin like
the Tri motor or the Junkers. same with the M21 on display. There was
expansion but wasn't same idea as Tri motor and Junkers.
You look at the Tri Motor and the Junkers, its an airplane that would
me fun to fly. or fly in.
I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
in Minnesota somewhere I think. or Michigan.
I think the F-105 was actually built by the Republic Locomotive Works.
Ed knows better on this one. Rugged, will say that. Irregardless of
the swill on C Span last weekend.
Moramarth - 09 Apr 2009 19:44 GMT
> I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
> schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
> in Minnesota somewhere I think. or Michigan.
Almost exactly 5 years ago I was just on some new meds that were doing
my head a bit. I heard a noise and stepped out the back door ( I live
near a hospital, there's frequent helicopter activity and if its
something unusual I sometimes wander up to take photos), looked up,
and breifly through the one hole in the cloud cover this silver JU52
with a black nose and cowlings crawled across the sky. "O.K.," I
thought, "That's Uncle Adolfs plane. This sh.t is making me
delusional..." A couple of days later I found Lufthansa's Tante Ju
was doing the rounds of the U.K., joyrides available. That was then.
EEC regulations now prevent a lot of older aircraft carrying
passengers since last year - I know a Dakota was giving it's final
rides at Newcastle last year.
Regards,
Moramarth
someone@some.domain - 09 Apr 2009 21:35 GMT
>> I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
>> schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Moramarth
thnaks for your word about bill. it all worked out.
Bruce Burden - 10 Apr 2009 03:46 GMT
: I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
: schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
: in Minnesota somewhere I think. or Michigan.
I recall that there was a Ford Tri-motor providing regular
passenger service to some islands in Lake Erie. The plane was
based in Ohio, perhaps around Toledo?
Bruce

Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes
The Old Man - 10 Apr 2009 16:57 GMT
> : I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
> : schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The Power and the Prophet
> Robert Don Hughes
Island Airlines, closer to Erie Pennsylvania. I ~think~ (but might be
wrong) that they also have a Boeing 247.
biteme - 11 Apr 2009 04:16 GMT
> > : I know there were one or two Tri motors flying one on a regular
> > : schedule. Any Junkers? anybody know where they are? Tri motor was up
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Not externally, but the B-17 used corrugated aluminum in the inner
wing sections, covered by sheet aluminum.
Don Stauffer - 09 Apr 2009 15:08 GMT
>> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>> skin?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> are lesser known.
> Ol' 45
Stout, the designer of the Tri-motor, also did a few other planes using
the stuff. Also, I believe there was a plane from a company called
Hamilton that used the stuff.
This was an attempt at stressed skin construction before folks learned
to do stress analysis well enough. The discipline of stress analysis of
complex structures was just evolving. Even with the equations, it took
a computer to really do the job well, or many thousands of man hours.
So folks just overdesigned.
R. Franklin - 08 Apr 2009 17:11 GMT
>Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
>skin?
More strength and structural integrity while using less material and
bracing. The same reasons corrugated card board is corrugated.
Bruce Burden - 09 Apr 2009 03:41 GMT
: Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
: skin?
There is also that Budd aircraft sitting at Pima. Anybody
remember what it was?
Never saw an aircraft designed by a rail road company before.
After seeing that thing, I know why, too. And, no, Bombardier
does NOT count!
Bruce

Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes
famvburg@gmail.com - 09 Apr 2009 13:56 GMT
The Budd's not corrugated, is it?
> : Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
> : skin?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The Power and the Prophet
> Robert Don Hughes
Richard Brooks - 09 Apr 2009 16:12 GMT
Musicman59 said the following on 08/04/2009 15:34:
> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
> skin?
>
> Craig
Handley Page HP-42. Take one Pullman railway carriage, stick a
cockpit, tail assembly and set of wings on it and "all aboard!"
Mad-Modeller - 15 Apr 2009 05:05 GMT
Musicman59 <cwestbrooke@gmail.com> wrote in news:03766d03-fa46-43d7-bb99-
03d19fd3877f@a23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:
> Nothing else comes to mind - any advantage to using this type of metal
> skin?
>
> Craig
Most if not all PZL fighters had corrugated wingskins. I think one of
Curtiss' biplane fighters had corrugated skin on the vertical tail.
Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr.