Heya folks!
Workin' on building a bunch of weapon systems
from the Korean 'Fratricidal War' (that's the name
for it over here in teh RoK) and I'm picking up the
Commonwealth armour kits now.
What helmet did they wear in combat? I've been
doing some googling and not coming up with any
satisfactory pics or info. I would SUSPECT that
it would be the WWII unit with the wide brim, but
I distinctly recall a few episodes of M*A*S*H
werein the limeys wer portrayed with the US tin-
pots.
Knowing that the TV show strove very hard for
as much accuracy as possible, which helmet is
it?
advTHANXance!
-ahill
frank - 25 Apr 2010 15:19 GMT
Not sure about the helmets, but accuracy? I know of 2 occasions
where they mentioned wrong a/c. No, I don't mean subbing a PT-22 for
'5 o'clock Charlie' or whatever. The episode where the USO bunch was
in town, Potter tells the older chick that he thinks of her every time
he sees a C-42 running up. Yeah, they're all over the place. The other
is where they're trying to get an incubator I think & the General or
Colonel they're talking with mentions among the things he can get is
the occasional odd B-52. I guess he knew something the USAF didn't. I
know it flew in the early '50s, but I don't think they were quite
available during Korea. I think there was another mis-named a/c as
well. I dunno how much I'd trust 'em.
On Apr 25, 7:18 am, "hill4...@gmail.com" <hill4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heya folks!
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> -ahill
WmB - 25 Apr 2010 19:55 GMT
> Knowing that the TV show strove very hard for
> as much accuracy as possible, which helmet is
> it?
>
> -ahill
Hopefully that's sarcasm - M*A*S*H is a poor source for authenticity of US
mil in Korea.
You can't go wrong with the MKIII-IV Turtle. Even if the M1 pisspot were
correct for Commonwealth (doubtful) or UN/NATO forces in the RoK '50-53,
I'd consider a little artistic license here. A Free French soldier marching
on Paris in the summer of 1944 will be all but indistingushable from a US
dogface in the absence of a Croix De Lorraine or Tricolore to que on.
WmB
Gerald Owens - 26 Apr 2010 01:14 GMT
On Apr 25, 8:18 am, "hill4...@gmail.com" <hill4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heya folks!
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> -ahill
If by wide brim, you mean the wide, oval helmet worn in 1940, then no,
they wouldn't have those in Korea. A new helmet was designed in 1944,
which did not resemble the US M1 helmet. It looks more like the old
Dutch helmets from 1940--deeper around the head with a pronounced
"tail." It wasn't universally issued during World War Two, but would
have been ubiquitous by 1950. Of course, UK troops have often worn
soft caps in circumstances where US troop would be wearing helmets.
Gerald Owens
Rufus - 26 Apr 2010 01:24 GMT
> On Apr 25, 8:18 am, "hill4...@gmail.com" <hill4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Heya folks!
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> soft caps in circumstances where US troop would be wearing helmets.
> Gerald Owens
http://www.dm1975.com/WWII%20helmets/repaint.jpg
A Google image search on "korean war era us helmet" or "korean war era
us soldiers" will yield tons of examples...

Signature
- Rufus
Obviousman - 26 Apr 2010 09:52 GMT
This might help. Australian troops often appear not to wear them, such
as here:
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/HOBJ2514
These are some I found with Australian troops wearing a helmet:
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/HOBJ4410
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/LEEJ0656
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/LEEJ0658
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/MELJ0853
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/P04963.007
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/HOBJ1610
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/P01813.326
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/HOBJ4908
They did wear the US-style helmet at latter stages of the war, though:
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/SWEJ0169
http://cas.awm.gov.au/screen_img/MELJ0835
Perhaps because they patrolling the DMZ?
> Heya folks!
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> -ahill
hill4448@gmail.com - 28 Apr 2010 02:45 GMT
> This might help. Australian troops often appear not to wear them, such
> as here:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Perhaps because they patrolling the DMZ?
Thanks! That's just what I was looking for!