Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / March 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HMS Victory spanker

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CA Benson - 05 Mar 2004 21:01 GMT
Has anyone had a problem fitting the spanker on the Heller HMS
Victory?  It appears that it is about two panels too wide.

It appears that the instructions for rigging the Buntlines on the
missen sails are wrong.  I believe the buntlinesshould rung abaft of
the sail.  Anyone concur with this?

C.Benson
Mike Keown - 07 Mar 2004 02:49 GMT
I am not really a sea going man...but what is a 'spanker'?
Mike IPMS
> Has anyone had a problem fitting the spanker on the Heller HMS
> Victory?  It appears that it is about two panels too wide.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> C.Benson
CA Benson - 07 Mar 2004 06:42 GMT
The spanker or driver is the lowest sail on the mizzen mast.  It is
rigged to a boom and a gaff.

C.Benson

> I am not really a sea going man...but what is a 'spanker'?
> Mike IPMS
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> > C.Benson
Keeper - 07 Mar 2004 08:29 GMT
>I am not really a sea going man...but what is a 'spanker'?
>Mike IPMS

Yeah, me too. Poopdecks and now spankers; those seafarers were a kinky lot!
tia

Keeper (of too much crap)
Boris Beizer - 07 Mar 2004 17:40 GMT
> I am not really a sea going man...but what is a 'spanker'?
> Mike IPMS
> > Has anyone had a problem fitting the spanker on the Heller HMS
> > Victory?  It appears that it is about two panels too wide.

The spanker is a fore-and-aft sail on the rearmost mast of a ship.  In
addition to provide thrust, it helps to balance the helm against the action
of the various jibs and staysails that are used in going to winward.

> > It appears that the instructions for rigging the Buntlines on the
> > missen sails are wrong.  I believe the buntlinesshould rung abaft of
> > the sail.  Anyone concur with this?

It is called the "mizzen" sail, not "missen."  Not likely.  Buntlines
normally run forward of the sails.

The definitive book is Eighteent-Century Rigs and Rigging, by Markquardt,
published by Cornell Maritime Press.   However, for Victory, you should
refer to "The Anatomy of Nelson's Ships."   Can't remember the author or
publisher.

Boris

Signature

-------------------------------------
Boris Beizer Ph.D.                 Seminars and Consulting
1232 Glenbrook Road                on Software Testing and
Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006        Quality Assurance

TEL: 215-572-5580
FAX: 215-886-0144
Email bsquare "at" sprintmail.com

------------------------------------------

David Graf - 07 Mar 2004 21:19 GMT
> The definitive book is Eighteent-Century Rigs and Rigging, by Markquardt,
> published by Cornell Maritime Press.   However, for Victory, you should
> refer to "The Anatomy of Nelson's Ships."   Can't remember the author or
> publisher.
>
> Boris

_The Anatomy of Nelson's Ships_  by C. Nepean Longridge.  My edition was
published in 1994 by Naval Institute Press, ISBN 0-87021-077-7.  Despite the
plural "Ships" in the title, the book is a very detailed work on modeling
the Victory.  I believe it was originally written in the late 1950's, so
later research may have rendered some details in it incorrect, but overall
it's an excellent resource.

   Dave
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.