Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Duplex Drive Shermans

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve Faxon - 13 Jun 2004 04:46 GMT
looking for info on DD's used at Omaha and Utah.

M4 or M4A1 hulls?

75mm guns only?

hatches on the turret were? (split commander with or without oval loaders?)

low bustle?

any help would be great.
William H. Shuey - 13 Jun 2004 06:02 GMT
> looking for info on DD's used at Omaha and Utah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> any help would be great.

    The Sherman's used at the D-Day landings weren't all just the duplex
drive jobbies. Many years ago (more that I care to admit) when I was in
the reserves we had an old tanker Sergeant who used to talk about the
special Sherman's built just for the landings that were code named
"Cobra Kings". I don't remember what the model number was but it seems
they were a batch made just for the D-Day landings. They were heavier
that the basic Sherman because they had a whole lot of additional armor
added during construction. The idea was that the up armored tanks would
be a help in blasting our way through the beach head defenses.
    The catch was that the extra weight was very detrimental to the
lifespan of the tracks and suspension parts. The reasoning was they
would just be used for that breakout from the beach head and then they
would be replaced by standard Shermans. He said that they found that the
up armored tanks had a much higher survival rate than the "standard"
models so the units that had them didn't always turn them in. He said
they would rob/cannibalize parts off standard Shermans to keep the Cobra
Kings rolling in the up front positions. They even robbed some standard
Shermans with the later 76 mm guns of their turrets to up gun the Cobra
Kings as well. He had a photograph of a tank he said was an up gunned
Cobra King sitting in a ruined house somewhere in Germany in March of
1945. Snow looked to be 3 feet deep. Pretty good life span for a tank
that was built to last just a couple of days.

                            Bill Shuey
Steve Faxon - 14 Jun 2004 04:43 GMT
Hi Bill, it sounds like the tank you are describing is the "Jumbo" Sherman.
They came along a little later than D-Day but without busting out the books I
don't know exactly when. Thanks for the reply though.
Bushy - 13 Jun 2004 11:16 GMT
Watched a two part special on TV recently on the National Geographic
channel. Even found a flail tank diorama I want to make after seeing the cd
cases on the books.....

"D Day, Machines of Invasion"

Had a great run of info and old footage of testing the funnies, and was
really good to see it all. Would be worth getting a copy on video or dvd if
available.

Just called up their website and finally found it (I'm on dialup, and have
three other things downloading as well.......) There are several links to
follow as well, a couple of them look good.....

http://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/microsites/D-day/

I'd assume that some of the tanks that were modified in the field were from
a range of different model tanks, the ones that were factory mods would have
been made from scratch to allow the drive to the props so would possibly be
same series tanks. Drive units on one of the linked sites shows they were
driven off the idler wheel rather than the engine so very little factory
modification was required. The blueprints that are mentioned in the show
would tend to make me think they were made up to suit the original tanks at
the time of construction.

Just in time before sending this is this quote from one of the linked sites:
"This system of floatation resulted therefore in enormous economy of
manufacturing speed as witnessed by the conversion of some2,000 tanks in
this country alone, and of some 300 in the U. S. in the course of a very
short period of time."
which tends to make you think that several models were probably adapted as
more were modified in Britain than back in the states. These tanks were not
expected to last all the way to Berlin!

Weathering the tanks could prove interesting, wonder how many fishing rods
to include?

Hope this helps,
Peter

> looking for info on DD's used at Omaha and Utah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> any help would be great.
Nigel - 13 Jun 2004 14:20 GMT
I saw a documentary a week ago about the DDs.  What I didn't realise was the
shocking fate of the DDs used initially at Omaha.

There were 27 used, and the recommendation was that they should be launched
not further than 1 mile out.  The trouble was that the guy in charge of the
landing crafts refused to take them any closer than 3 miles as he was not
prepared to put his craft in danger.  The water conditions of the English
Channel were very different to the Mississippi on which they were tested.
The crying shame is that all 27 DDs sank with the loss of most (if not all)
of the 135 crew.  Not only was this a dreadful waste of brave lives but it
left the poor infantry unsupported on the beach.

DDs for the English and Canadian landings were launched 1 mile out and
reached the beach successfully.  A german survivor recounted on the
documentary, his unit's shock when they saw tanks emerge from the sea,
seemingly out of nowhere.

Furthermore, the rocket ships which were supposed to pepper Omaha beach with
craters so that the troops would have cover fired their rockets 1/4 mile
short so that they fell harmlessly into the sea.

Cheers,

Nigel
Keeper - 13 Jun 2004 19:26 GMT
>  The trouble was that the guy in charge of the
>landing crafts refused to take them any closer than 3 miles as he was not
>prepared to put his craft in danger.

I think I saw the same program, very infuriating waste. Funny they couldn't
attach a name.
Cheers,

The Keeper (of too much crap)
tom hiett - 13 Jun 2004 15:50 GMT
noxaf@aol.com (Steve Faxon) wrote in message
> looking for info on DD's used at Omaha and Utah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> low bustle?

Did some searching a week or two on Google and came up with quite a
bit, like drawing for the extended periscopes and other bits. Don't
see where I have those bookmarked but there is some stuff here:

http://tanxheaven.com/dg/shermanDD/shermanDD.htm
http://www.d-daytanks.org.uk/stories/straussler.html
http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/UnitedStates/mediumtanks/M4/M4.html

Tom
AMPSOne - 13 Jun 2004 18:23 GMT
The basics of what you asked are:

BOTH M4 and M4A1 were used;

They were all "mid" production variants (late production M4A1 with "big
hatches" were apparently used in Operation DRAGOON, the southern landings in
France later on;

All were early hatches.

As for better details, most of the websites that some of the guys have listed
will give you a more complete picture of what happened.

Cookie Sewell
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.