Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[Q] Monogram Lunar Lander kit /148

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gray Ghost - 28 Jun 2004 05:09 GMT
First, I've read that the Mongram is better than the Revell becasue the
Revell is a prototype and the Mono is from after several missions.

However I have found there are at least three versions of the kit! One,
apparently later has the shadows molded into the base, you're supposed to
paint them black. Another earlier version I just saw on Ebay has a moon
surface base without the shadows. I'd get that one but it's started. Then I
also saw on ebay a SnapTite 1/48 LEM.

These are the kits I've found.
First Lunar Landing, Monogram #6872
First Lunar Landing, Monogram #5503 (1979), 10th Anniversary
First Lunar Landing, Monogram #6060, Heritage Edition
First Lunar Landing, Monogram #5901, Young Astronauts
First Lunar Landing, Monogram #5081 (1993), 25th Anniversary
Don't have the number for the SnapTite.

Any history, comments?
Gene DiGennaro - 28 Jun 2004 14:45 GMT
> First, I've read that the Mongram is better than the Revell becasue the
> Revell is a prototype and the Mono is from after several missions.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Any history, comments?

I'm not too familiar with the Snap tite LEM. However, the other models
are all of the same kit that was released during the 60's. They are
more accurate than the Revell kit as the Monogram LEM represents the
LEM after the super weight reduction program. There is a toy LEM
released a few years ago by IPI toys that is a rather accurate 1/48
model of the LEM and a nice CSM too. Check out Sven Knudsen's website
on space craft models:
http://www.theninfinger.org
also check out
http://www.realspacemodels.com

Hope this helps,
Gene DiGennaro
Baltimore, Md.
Gray Ghost - 29 Jun 2004 02:13 GMT
>> First, I've read that the Mongram is better than the Revell becasue
>> the Revell is a prototype and the Mono is from after several missions.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Gene DiGennaro
> Baltimore, Md.

Yup, been all over Ninfinger. Gives the kit # but nothing else. Found
another site but it only talks aboutthe one with the funky shadiws.

Signature

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who
approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but
downright force. Whenever you give up that force you are ruined ... The
great object is that every man be armed ... everyone who is able may have a
gun."
Patrick Henry at the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the
Constitution.

Gene DiGennaro - 29 Jun 2004 14:13 GMT
> Yup, been all over Ninfinger. Gives the kit # but nothing else. Found
> another site but it only talks aboutthe one with the funky shadiws.

Definitely join the spacemodeler's yahoo group. There's some very
knowledgeable people there who could answer your questions. There's a
link to the group on Sven's site.

Gene
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.