Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

diesel engines

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Mccann - 19 Feb 2004 02:16 GMT
Was the CB&Q the first railroad to come  out with diesel in 1934?
Paul McCann  

God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.                                                                            
Christopher A. Lee - 19 Feb 2004 05:49 GMT
>God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.                                                                            

Is hthat the name of your dog? What the heck has that got to do with
railroads?
Gerard Pawlowski - 22 Feb 2004 07:20 GMT
> >God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.                                                                            
>
> Is hthat the name of your dog? What the heck has that got to do with
> railroads?

Dear sir,
    No, I never heard of a dog named 'Hthat'.  Most of the time you want a
name you can yell and be heard with.  Like 'Hey you'...that's a good one.
Of course then you have your dog chasing after anybody who says 'Hey you'.

    As far as God having anything to do with railroads, I presume the
invention of matter and existence would fall into that category, yes.
I mean, shoot, it would be pretty difficult to make a 28 D 81/8 diesel
engine without the atoms to make the iron from, don't your think?
                                                 Cordially yours,
                                                    Gerard P.
Geezer - 19 Feb 2004 09:06 GMT
It depends on what you mean.  If you are referring to the CB&Q #9900 as a
Diesel powered streamlined articulated train set, yes, it was the first in
the US.  But it was not the first internal combustion powered streamlined
articulated train set - the UP M-10000 was delivered 2 months earlier.  UP
M-10000 had a distillate burning, spark ignition engine so it was not truly
a "Diesel".  But CB&Q #9900 was not the first RR diesel locomotive.  The CNJ
#1000 of 1924 is generally called the first commercially successful
diesel-electric locomotive.  But it was not the first diesel locomotive
either.  There were various experimentals as early as 1918.  And these were
not the first internal combustion RR units - GE built a gas-electric
doodlebug as early as 1906.  GQ

> Was the CB&Q the first railroad to come  out with diesel in 1934?
> Paul McCann
Jim Bernier - 19 Feb 2004 16:13 GMT
Paul,

 IIRC, the first real diesel may have been an Ingersall-Rand boxcab for
the CNJ.  The CB&Q Pioneer Zephyr may have been the first 'diesel'
powered passenger train.  Most previous attempts were gas-electric
'doodlebug' cars that had  a gasoline engine in them.

Jim Bernier

> Was the CB&Q the first railroad to come  out with diesel in 1934?
> Paul McCann
>
> God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.
Beowulf - 20 Feb 2004 17:26 GMT
Salvé
> Paul,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.

This may be  true for the USA however the  first diesel loco was a shunter
(switcher) in Hull docks owned by the Royal Navy,  4 hp and  c 1880 I
believe, the first diesel electric was a swedish unit, 1902 I think but I'm
not sure.The RN loco was an oil engine  and rather earlier than herr Doktor
Diesel's invention, so it might not be strictly speaking a diesel, but then
Dr Diesels engines never worked anyway :) ( started by compressed air)so
modern disels may not be Diesels either :D
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 20 Feb 2004 18:41 GMT
> Salvé
> > Paul,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> modern disels may not be Diesels either :D
> Beowulf

The important design feature/concept of a Diesel engine is that it is totally
compression ignition in normal operation. The RN loco you are talking about
used a separate chamber maintained at a high temperature in conjunction with
compression to create fuel mixture ignition, a rather hit and miss system that
severely limited the rev range and hence the practiability of such motors.

Regards,
Greg.P.
Beowulf - 20 Feb 2004 23:56 GMT
> > Salvé
> > > Paul,
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Regards,
> Greg.P.

I stand happily corrected :) Wasnt it called a robinson oil engine or
something like that?   bit of a mouthful, diesel is so much easier :) though
not a tasty......
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 21 Feb 2004 01:58 GMT
> > > Salvé
> > > > Paul,
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> not a tasty......
> Beowulf

Robinson sounds familiar - I have a book from the period (well 1890s) with some
statistics of available British engines and diagrams/details of a Tangyes
engine. One has to turn a blowtorch on the bulb chamber attached to the
combustion chamber until it nears red hot to get the cylinder contents to
ignite. Because of the volume of the bulb chamber the compression ratio can
never be sufficient for the mixture to compression ignite but I think the theory
is that the small connecting aperture becomes close to invisible at normal
operating speed.
Beowulf - 21 Feb 2004 20:26 GMT
Salvé

> > I stand happily corrected :) Wasnt it called a robinson oil engine or
> > something like that?   bit of a mouthful, diesel is so much easier :) though
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> is that the small connecting aperture becomes close to invisible at normal
> operating speed.

This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in production ,
albeit for fishing boats  they have a very distinctive sound you can hear
every piston stroke ! the factory that made this type of engine closed down
in the 40/50´s and stood as left, then in the 90´s it was reopened as a
living museum and produces spares (1 Employee........) for existing motors
of which unbelievably there are many, both world wide and in Scandinavia,
its a VERY reliable motor(no electrics) BMW also made them for their farm
tractors,  I must find out where this factory is :)
Beowulf
Steve Caple - 21 Feb 2004 23:00 GMT
> This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in production ,
> albeit for fishing boats  they have a very distinctive sound you can hear
> every piston stroke !

What the heck, my ex-father-in-law (now dead, and I miss him)
had a 1935 Seabird yawl (good sea-keeper  -  cramped cabin,
but a helluva keel -  a North Sea inspired boat) with a one
lunger gasoline engine that even at full bore just chugged
along, every detonation in it's long, long stroke separately
audible like an old tractor, or 1/6 of an Austin Healy 3000
motor. (What's the difference, you ask?  Nil.)

Signature

Steve Caple

Beowulf - 22 Feb 2004 18:23 GMT
Salvé
> > This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in production ,
> > albeit for fishing boats  they have a very distinctive sound you can hear
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Steve Caple

Dear Steve,
A bit like a Panther motorcycle then :) 600cc single cylinder........
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 22 Feb 2004 22:29 GMT
> Salvé
> > > This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> A bit like a Panther motorcycle then :) 600cc single cylinder........
> Beowulf

There was nothing like a Panther motorcycle motor!
Steve Caple - 23 Feb 2004 01:42 GMT
> A bit like a Panther motorcycle then :) 600cc single cylinder

Otherwise known as "the proctologists' friend"?

Signature

Steve Caple

wkaiser@mtholyoke.edu - 23 Feb 2004 13:03 GMT
What does SV: mean?

--  
Bill Kaiser
wkaiser@mtholyoke.edu

There are three ways to do a job: good, cheap, and quick.
You can have any two.
A good, cheap job won't be quick.
A good, quick job won't be cheap.
A cheap, quick job won't be good.
will@CreditValley.Railway - 23 Feb 2004 15:02 GMT
> What does SV: mean?

Sports Vehicle

Signature

Will
HO - Credit Valley Railway
www.muskokacomputes.com/CVR_Home.htm

Beowulf - 23 Feb 2004 17:23 GMT
Salvé

> What does SV: mean?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> A good, quick job won't be cheap.
> A cheap, quick job won't be good.

This is the swedish version of ms's  thingy  (I live in Sweden) and sv is
short fro SVAR which means answer, ie  swer in answer is the same word as
svar... :)
Beowulf
Steve Caple - 23 Feb 2004 19:02 GMT
Bill wrote:
> What does SV: mean?

Same as "Re:" appended to the subject when you reply to a
thread in a newsreader that uses English rather than Swedish.

Signature

Steve Caple

Gregory Procter - 22 Feb 2004 22:27 GMT
> > This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in production ,
> > albeit for fishing boats  they have a very distinctive sound you can hear
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> audible like an old tractor, or 1/6 of an Austin Healy 3000
> motor. (What's the difference, you ask?  Nil.)

The Austin Healey/Westminster motor was built more heavily!
Beowulf - 23 Feb 2004 17:25 GMT
Salvé

> > > This type of engine known in Sweden as a "Kulmotor" is still in production ,
> > > albeit for fishing boats  they have a very distinctive sound you can hear
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The Austin Healey/Westminster motor was built more heavily!

Rolls Royce built boxer steam motors :) ie Sentinel , used in locos and
lorries up to the 70´s I believ!

Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 23 Feb 2004 18:19 GMT
> Salvé
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Rolls Royce built boxer steam motors :) ie Sentinel , used in locos and
> lorries up to the 70´s I believ!

I didn't think they went beyond the 1950s, but the 1970s is possible. Those
motors were intended to be light weight whereas the Austin motor seems to have
been intended to stop large trucks from blowing away during hurricanes!
Gregory Procter - 22 Feb 2004 22:25 GMT
> Salvé
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> tractors,  I must find out where this factory is :)
> Beowulf

You may be thinking of the "Lanz Bulldog" built from 1934 to the 1960s.
There was one on a neighbouring farm when I was a teenager. It was started using
a cartridge like a shotgun shell.
The motor had to be extremely solidly constructed and has a huge flywheel to
convert the slow cylinder impulses into continuous motion. I think the only
thing that will destroy such motors is a flawed casting, although probably
sinking to the bottom of the north sea would slow them a little.
Jon Miller - 23 Feb 2004 01:47 GMT
>It was started using a cartridge like a shotgun shell.<
   That airplane engine in the movie "Flight of the Phoenix" used something
like that to start the engine.  Something I'd never heard of so dismissed it
as Hollywood!
Beowulf - 23 Feb 2004 17:28 GMT
Salvé
> >It was started using a cartridge like a shotgun shell.<
>     That airplane engine in the movie "Flight of the Phoenix" used something
> like that to start the engine.  Something I'd never heard of so dismissed it
> as Hollywood!

Many piston engined aircraft used a cartridge system as well as a few jet
aircraft, the  Canberra bomber for one if I remember correctly. The USAF
used an american built version.
Beowulf
Beowulf - 23 Feb 2004 17:27 GMT
Salvé

> > Salvé
> >
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> thing that will destroy such motors is a flawed casting, although probably
> sinking to the bottom of the north sea would slow them a little.

No it was a Swedish built motor, and lying on the sea bottom would probably
not do them much damage.....they were (the BMW) also started by a blowlamp.
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 23 Feb 2004 18:26 GMT
> Salvé
> >
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> No it was a Swedish built motor, and lying on the sea bottom would probably
> not do them much damage.....they were (the BMW) also started by a blowlamp.

I don't have much experience with old BMWs as it's a long way from Eisenach and
Bavaria to New Zealand.
I know the Austin Seven motor of the Dixi, the Bristol 2 litre, the Issetta and
the horizontally opposed twins and have read of the post war V8.
Very few Swedish motors have made it to my door, a SAAB 3 cylinder and there's
some nutter with the entire NZ collection of Volvo Amazons only 5-6 kilometers
down the road.

Regards,
Greg.P.
Beowulf - 24 Feb 2004 19:12 GMT
Salvé
> > No it was a Swedish built motor, and lying on the sea bottom would probably
> > not do them much damage.....they were (the BMW) also started by a blowlamp.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Regards,
> Greg.P.

I rather like amazons :) but the Duette which they are based on is a nicer
sort of car. looks like a pregnant morris traveller....
:)

Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 24 Feb 2004 22:51 GMT
> Salvé
> > > No it was a Swedish built motor, and lying on the sea bottom would
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I rather like amazons :) but the Duette which they are based on is a nicer
> sort of car. looks like a pregnant morris traveller....

Is that one of the round back styles? I saw one here once.
Beowulf - 25 Feb 2004 12:17 GMT
Salvé

> > Salvé
> > > > No it was a Swedish built motor, and lying on the sea bottom would
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Is that one of the round back styles? I saw one here once.

Yes , but the estate car (Station wagon)  is really nice :) and the B18
engine is superb, mind you its  a simple matter to uprate it to a more
modern engine and gear box, though as they can cruise at 70mph thi wasnt big
on my list of things to do when I had a 1967  model.

Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 25 Feb 2004 19:02 GMT
> Salvé
> >
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> modern engine and gear box, though as they can cruise at 70mph thi wasnt big
> on my list of things to do when I had a 1967  model.

Well, until a few years ago the only Volvo cars we ever saw were private
imports. As there are no spare parts (here) one would have expected them to have
a very short life span but a few still trundle around!
Beowulf - 26 Feb 2004 17:33 GMT
Salvé

> > Salvé
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> imports. As there are no spare parts (here) one would have expected them to have
> a very short life span but a few still trundle around!

They are unbelievably well built and the B18 motor (1800cc) is virtually
bullet proof, there are even still a few of the extremely rare volvo vans
driving around in daily use, and thats not to mntion the amasing Volvo
command car with a 4 liter diesel motor.... I wants one..... :) especially
the radio command car with the bulkhead  filled with dials and other touchy
feely goodies!! oh yes unlike a jeep its also armoured I think!
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 27 Feb 2004 04:10 GMT
> Salvé
> >
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> feely goodies!! oh yes unlike a jeep its also armoured I think!
> Beowulf

If I find one I'll swap it for a KdF Commandeurwagen!

Regards,
Greg.P.
Beowulf - 28 Feb 2004 14:06 GMT
Salvé
> > > > Yes , but the estate car (Station wagon)  is really nice :) and the B18
> > > > engine is superb, mind you its  a simple matter to uprate it to a more
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Regards,
> Greg.P.

Well unlike the VW this is a huge car as well as having a functional 4wd and
built like a tank :) it would make a good shunting (switching) loco on a
museum  line, its an amasing  bit of kit :)
beowulf
Gregory Procter - 28 Feb 2004 18:06 GMT
> Salvé
> > > > > Yes , but the estate car (Station wagon)  is really nice :) and the
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> museum  line, its an amasing  bit of kit :)
> beowulf

So you'll be happy to swap! :-)
The KDF wagen was also produced as a rail vehicle (Type 82(?)) - I've always
wondered how they got over the variable track width created by the rear swinging
arms?

Regards,
Greg.P.
Steve Hoskins - 19 Feb 2004 21:36 GMT
>Was the CB&Q the first railroad to come  out with diesel in 1934?

No.  

>God bless you and have a good day with Him at your side.                                                                            

I thought LBJ's beagle died years ago.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.