> > Hi all,
> > has anyone out there got a stack of N scale Rapido (standard)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Unless of course you need them for purposes other than car coupling...
I have a sideline hobby of building British models in HO rather than the usual British scale of
OO (1:76.2) The goods wagons are very small and my usual NEM couplers looked terrible on them,
rather like a trolley for carrying two huge couplers, ;-)
Kadees don't look great either and their height clashes with the frame/buffer beam.
My final solution is to mount a Rapido coupler head on a phosphor bronze wire mounted near the
middle of the wagon so that the wire is gently sprung against the underside of the buffer beam
with the coupler head extending beyond the buffers. Uncoupling is by soft iron 3 link chain
hanging from the wire at the buffer beam. A between the rails magnet will pull one coupler
down.
The final bonus is that this mounting will directly couple with European NEM couplers as if I
had planned it that way.
I trim off the mounting end of the Rapido coupling and drill a suitable sized hole in the shank
for the p/b wire, so it really doesn't matter what that end is like. :-)
Regards,
Greg.P.
Peter W. - 23 Jun 2004 06:17 GMT
> I have a sideline hobby of building British models in HO rather than the usual British scale of
> OO (1:76.2) The goods wagons are very small and my usual NEM couplers looked terrible on them,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Regards,
> Greg.P.
Quite an interesting solution ! Simple and robust design ! I like it !
Let me dig through my stash and see what I can send you.
I'll contact you off-line.
Peteski
Gregory Procter - 23 Jun 2004 06:34 GMT
> > I have a sideline hobby of building British models in HO rather than the usual British scale of
> > OO (1:76.2) The goods wagons are very small and my usual NEM couplers looked terrible on them,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Quite an interesting solution ! Simple and robust design ! I like it !
I like simple and robust so long as it doesn't look offensive. :-)
> Let me dig through my stash and see what I can send you.
> I'll contact you off-line.
Great!
> Peteski
Beowulf - 23 Jun 2004 16:56 GMT
Salvé
> I have a sideline hobby of building British models in HO rather than the usual British scale of
> OO (1:76.2) The goods wagons are very small and my usual NEM couplers looked terrible on them,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Regards,
> Greg.P.
Dear Greg,
Why arent you using the alex jackson coupling which is all but invisible
and commercially available ? oh yes it magnetic too... :)
Beowulf
Gregory Procter - 23 Jun 2004 21:49 GMT
> Salvé
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Why arent you using the alex jackson coupling which is all but invisible
> and commercially available ? oh yes it magnetic too... :)
I did look at the Alex Jackson coupling first and it would have been my
preference except for a number of factors:
- I'm using tight radii on my layout in the hidden sidings. This would require
the couplings to be extended which introduces a lot of 'slop' between wagons.
- I'm using assorted wheel profiles on my layout so I can't tighten up the 1mm
of free movement between flanges and rails of NMRA RP25 wheels.
- there is no provision for buffing with the AJ coupling. With the tight radii
and sideways movement of my wheel/rail standards I certainly can't rely on the
wagon buffers.
- AJ won't couple with NEM couplers.
I could have modified the AJ to include buffing, but the increased side
movement would have required an extended hook, which automatically increases
the free play between wagons at a ratio of about 2:1. To add compatibility with
NEM couplers would have added yet another wire and the result was starting to
look like a rampant TV antenna!
Regards,
Greg.P.