>Christopher,
>I've heard of Beaver Creek but I'm not real familiar with them. IIRC they
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>to DCC and do you have any advice on the installation if you have? Thanks.
>Bruce
I haven't converted it.
Beaver Creek went out of business a few years ago due to bankrupcy -
the owner was living off downs paid for models. He had downs off me
for a 2-6-0 (Tahoe), a set of 4 passenger cars (the Brill and Oxford
cars) and the water cars.
But in spite of that their models were super-detailed museum quality.
I have their #26 and #27, and can recommend Heather Clark of Portland
OR as a custom painter (she also super-detailed my oil-fired Reno, you
wouldn't recognise it from the original model). She is a V&T
specialist who attends some of the West Coast shows (I met her at a
train show in San Raphael CA before I moved to New York) and also the
annual V&T symposium at Carson City. She does a terrific job, and I
only stopped sending her work because of financial difficulties and
job uncertainty.
The engine was state of the art for pre-DCC sound systems and has a
cam on one of the driving wheels with room for a sensor switch. So
there ought to be room for a decoder.
I bought mine more than 10 years ago, and they're probably fetching
more than I paid, these days.
I'm not into DCC myself, but the motor is a small low power
consumption can so you should be able to use a small decoder. Maybe
even an N-scale one. Or put it in the tender next to where you would
put the speaker (there is a grille for the speaker). I'f you're
installing sound then you will have wires to the tender anyway.
It might even be a coreless motor - it has many of the characteristics
(smoothness, sensitivity and low power consumption). So I'd be careful
which decoder you choose. That kind of motor doesn't like
time-division pulses - my throttle gives pure voltage regulated DC.
Good luck....Chris
>> >want to re-motor it so the motor does not hang out of the cab in such an
>> >unsightly way. The tender drive models would be ok with me if they run
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> the firebox. It's also got a lot more detail. Mine ran well straight
>> out of the box.
+GF+ - 29 Sep 2004 20:06 GMT
Excellent advice re Beaver Creek. If you can find one, jump on it....
Matter-of-fact excellent advice all together and endorsement of Heather.

Signature
+GF+
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Books may introduce unfamiliar or confusing
ideas. In the event of uncomfortable self-reflection, heat to 451°
Fahrenheit ( 232.78° Centigrade or 505.9 Kelvin ) and seek television
immediately.
www.internationalrailfair.com
www.ete.org
Christopher A. Lee - 29 Sep 2004 20:41 GMT
>Excellent advice re Beaver Creek. If you can find one, jump on it....
>
>Matter-of-fact excellent advice all together and endorsement of Heather.
They ain't cheap unfortunately. I did a quick web search and found a
Beaver Creek V&T 27 (26's sister; basically the same engine with a
shotgun stack) at Caboose Hobbies, and they're asking $749. Which is a
heck of a lot more than I paid for mine 10 years ago.
They've also got a PFM tender drive V&T 26 for $150, painted for a
private railroad. Must be in pretty awful condition at that price.
And a Westside tender drive V&T 26 for $325. Again for a private
railroad. The photo looks quite good. It's not superdetailed, and the
paint job looks good - pity it would have to be stripped and
repainted.
I have a Sunset V&T 25 as well, which is a nice, well-detailed model.
I bought it second hand, painted. I don't know who did it but they
made a nice job of it (and the Julie Bulette club car I bought at the
same time).
IMO this is a better looking engine than 26 or 27. It is smaller, with
a lower boiler and long smoke stack. And when it shows up at the
dealers, it tends to be cheaper than the Beaver Creek engines.
Bruce Favinger - 30 Sep 2004 00:51 GMT
$749 is a chunk of cash for a little loco. Must be a very desirable model. I
was planning on keeping the cost of the model along any new gears,
additional detail and a new motor to under $400. The beaver Creek model may
be out of range unless I get lucky or find a basket case. Bruce
>>Excellent advice re Beaver Creek. If you can find one, jump on it....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> a lower boiler and long smoke stack. And when it shows up at the
> dealers, it tends to be cheaper than the Beaver Creek engines.
Christopher A. Lee - 30 Sep 2004 01:52 GMT
>$749 is a chunk of cash for a little loco. Must be a very desirable model. I
>was planning on keeping the cost of the model along any new gears,
>additional detail and a new motor to under $400. The beaver Creek model may
>be out of range unless I get lucky or find a basket case. Bruce
I was surprised how much they wanted. I checked ebay as well but
didn't see anything.
Will you be painting it for the V&T, or a freelance railroad?
>>>Excellent advice re Beaver Creek. If you can find one, jump on it....
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> a lower boiler and long smoke stack. And when it shows up at the
>> dealers, it tends to be cheaper than the Beaver Creek engines.
Bruce Favinger - 30 Sep 2004 07:13 GMT
For the Texas Midland. The TM #108 was almost exactly the same as the V&T
#26. The layout is called the Trinity Midland and is freelanced but I'm
attempting to be as prototypical as possible to the Texas Midland with the
locomotives, rolling stock and key structures like the stations, freight
houses and water tanks. Everything else is pure fantasy except by chance the
track arrangements and structure location at one of the towns turned out to
be almost exactly the same. Bruce
> Will you be painting it for the V&T, or a freelance railroad?
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>> a lower boiler and long smoke stack. And when it shows up at the
>>> dealers, it tends to be cheaper than the Beaver Creek engines.