Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / October 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

DC vs AC power for model locos

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mikal Fisher - 23 Oct 2004 22:43 GMT
I know this is primarily an HO forum, but I hope you will respond to
this question anyway.

I've modeled On3 and Gn3 with DC, and now I have some traditional 3 rail
O operations with AC.

I see no real advantages to AC. Sure, you can have reverse loops without
special wiring, and control the whistle or bell directly, but at what
expense?  Early and modern "E" units, necessary to reverse direction,
are finicky and expensive to replace. I imagine they add to the cost of
production in the first place.

The 3 railers always jump me when I ask this question on their forums,
so I thought I would try this one. Thanks for any input. MFisher
Gregory Procter - 24 Oct 2004 02:32 GMT
> I know this is primarily an HO forum, but I hope you will respond to
> this question anyway.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I see no real advantages to AC. Sure, you can have reverse loops without
> special wiring,

That relates to the three rail system, not AC vs DC.

> and control the whistle or bell directly, but at what
> expense?  Early and modern "E" units, necessary to reverse direction,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The 3 railers always jump me when I ask this question on their forums,
> so I thought I would try this one. Thanks for any input. MFisher

AC was the common standard until WWII because permanent magnets weren't and
rectifers were more expensive and less reliable than electro-mechanical
reversers.
Maerklin of German and Lionel retained AC because they felt the break in
compatibility of the old and new would lose them their established customer
bases.

AC has returned in the last 20 years in the form of digital control because
electronics prices have fallen to an almost reasonable level.

Regards,
Greg.P.
RAILDATA - 24 Oct 2004 04:03 GMT
Another reason for the AC with pre WW2 Lionale and other O three rail was the
problem of getting DC current, unless it was from batteries. The perm mag
motors were around.

The only rectifiers available to the averabe guy didn't come until the late
30's and there were copper oxide and later selinum...both of which deteriorated
rapidly.

So the AC tradition goes way back and the three railers and toy trade loved it
through all the Lionel glory years.

Even American Flyer's HO line was AC.
Trainman - 24 Oct 2004 13:48 GMT
> Another reason for the AC with pre WW2 Lionale and other O three rail was the
> problem of getting DC current, unless it was from batteries. The perm mag
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Even American Flyer's HO line was AC.

There were two different American Flyer HO lines.  The original was indeed
AC, but Gilbert got back into HO for a short time in the late 1950's, early
1960's, and these were "standard" DC models.  Don't confuse the two.

Don

--
don.dellmann@prodigy.net
http://www.geocities.com/don_dellmann
moderator: WisModelersAid@yahoogroups.com
moderator: MRPics@yahoogroups.com
moderator: vintageHO@yahoogroups.com
co-moderator: SCENERY@Yahoogroups.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MRPics
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vintageHO
Daniel A. Mitchell - 25 Oct 2004 14:55 GMT
> I know this is primarily an HO forum, but I hope you will respond to
> this question anyway.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> The 3 railers always jump me when I ask this question on their forums,
> so I thought I would try this one. Thanks for any input. MFisher

You are confusing two very different things.

The e-unit reversing problems you mention are the result of using AC
power, since you cannot contol train direction with polarity, as you do
in conventional DC. This argument makes no sense when DCC is considered,
since that does NOT depend on track polarity to determine direction.

The simplified track wiring you mention is the reuslt of using 3-rail
instead of 2-rail, and had NOTHING whatever to do with AC vs. DC.

Dan Mitchell
============
Mikal Fisher - 30 Oct 2004 16:18 GMT
Dan, thanks to you and the others for your responses. E units seem to
fail a lot, and are a pain and expense to replace. Other then tradition,
It seems to me that DC in either 2 or 3 rails would be cheaper and more
reliable than AC
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.